IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p6127-d1694437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operationalization of the Creative City Concept in Japan: A Comparative Review with a Special Focus on Kanazawa and Environmental Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Baptiste Gueniffey

    (Department of Architecture and Building Engineering, School of Environment and Society, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan)

  • Kei Sakamura

    (Department of Architecture and Building Engineering, School of Environment and Society, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan)

Abstract

The creative city concept has gained global recognition, notably through the UNESCO Creative Cities Network (UCCN). In Japan, facing declining birth rates and economic stagnation, this framework was seen as a revitalization tool to increase the urban quality. Yet, while the creative city concept clearly appears on the theoretical level, its operationalization usually remains unclear. Additionally, previous research considers sustainability questions through economic, social, and cultural lenses but more rarely through environmental aspects. Thus, this paper aims to explore the implementation of the creative city in Japan, unveil the specific elements composing the policies of UNESCO Creative Cities, and question how environmental sustainability is addressed in these policies. The research method includes a qualitative analysis of the membership monitoring reports (MMRs) submitted by cities to UNESCO. Conducting a field survey in a creative facility and a hearing survey with the city government, the research also focuses on Kanazawa as a case study to explore in greater depth the interaction between creative city strategies and environmental sustainability. Among the research findings, economic perspectives—through support for creative industries and the promotion of tourism—and systematic actions targeting children dominate the MMRs, while socio-environmental aspects receive less attention. Most ambitious initiatives toward environmental sustainability were implemented in rural cities. In Kanazawa, it appears the creative city policy is independent of the local environmental policies, although some opportunities exist to connect them. The field survey indeed reveals that some spontaneous initiatives toward environmental sustainability might emanate from a creative facility. Therefore, the paper provides significance in unveiling the specific content of creative city policies in Japan and in re-examining the notion of creativity to integrate environmental sustainability into the creative city agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Baptiste Gueniffey & Kei Sakamura, 2025. "Operationalization of the Creative City Concept in Japan: A Comparative Review with a Special Focus on Kanazawa and Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-30, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6127-:d:1694437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6127/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6127/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isabelle Joumard & Claude Giorno, 2005. "Getting the Most Out of Public Sector Decentralisation in Spain," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 436, OECD Publishing.
    2. Tomas Kačerauskas & Dalia Streimikiene & Rasa Bartkute, 2021. "Environmental Sustainability of Creative Economy: Evidence from a Lithuanian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Pratt, Andy C., 2008. "Creative cities: the cultural industries and the creative class," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 20704, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Han Han & You Wu & Zhan Su & Francesco Zurlo, 2024. "Design-Driven Innovation in Urban Context—Exploring the Sustainable Development of City Design Weeks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-30, February.
    5. Isabelle Joumard & Tadashi Yokoyama, 2005. "Getting the Most Out of Public Sector Decentralisation in Japan," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 416, OECD Publishing.
    6. Randall S. Jones & Tadashi Yokoyama, 2005. "Getting the Most Out of Public-Sector Decentralisation in Korea," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 468, OECD Publishing.
    7. Tetsuo Kidokoro & Ryo Fukuda & Kojiro Sho, 2022. "GENTRIFICATION IN TOKYO: Formation of the Tokyo West Creative Industry Cluster," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(6), pages 1055-1077, November.
    8. Vishal Kumar & Aude Vuilliomenet, 2021. "Urban Nature: Does Green Infrastructure Relate to the Cultural and Creative Vitality of European Cities?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-12, July.
    9. Isabelle Joumard, 2005. "Getting the Most Out of Public Sector Decentralisation in Mexico," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 453, OECD Publishing.
    10. Alina Betlej & Tomas Kačerauskas, 2021. "Urban Creative Sustainability: The Case of Lublin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Jamie Peck, 2005. "Struggling with the Creative Class," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 740-770, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brieuc Monfort, 2015. "Can Increased Public Expenditure Efficiency Contribute to the Consolidation of Public Finances in Japan?," Working Papers halshs-01548620, HAL.
    2. Luca Gandullia, 2012. "The role of direct taxes in fiscal decentralization," DEP - series of economic working papers 6/2012, University of Genoa, Research Doctorate in Public Economics.
    3. Thomas Borén & Patrycja Grzyś & Craig Young, 2021. "Spatializing authoritarian neoliberalism by way of cultural politics: City, nation and the European Union in Gdańsk’s politics of cultural policy formation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(6), pages 1211-1230, September.
    4. Kendall D. Funk & Erica Owen, 2020. "Consequences of an Anti‐Corruption Experiment for Local Government Performance in Brazil," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 444-468, March.
    5. Roman Martin, 2012. "Measuring Knowledge Bases in Swedish Regions," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(9), pages 1569-1582, September.
    6. Batabyal, Amitrajeet A. & Nijkamp, Peter, 2016. "Creative capital in production, inefficiency, and inequality: A theoretical analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 553-558.
    7. Kamila Borseková & Anna Vaňová & Janka Šúrová & Pavol Kráľ & Kamila Turečková & Jan Nevima & Stanislav Martinát, 2021. "The Nexus between Creative Actors and Regional Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Gregory James J. & Rogerson Christian M., 2018. "Suburban creativity: The geography of creative industriesin Johannesburg," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 39(39), pages 31-52, March.
    9. Sylwia Dudek-Mańkowska & Miroslaw Grochowski, 2019. "From creative industries to the creative place brand: some reflections on city branding in Poland," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(4), pages 274-287, December.
    10. Jenny Mbaye & ANDY C. PRATT, 2020. "Cities, Creativities and Urban Creative Economies: Re‐descriptions and Make+Shifts from Sub‐Saharan Africa," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 781-792, September.
    11. Jane Zheng, 2021. "STRUCTURING ARTISTIC CREATIVITY FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A ‘CREATIVE CITY’: Urban Sculpture Planning in Shanghai," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 795-813, September.
    12. Ichiro Aoki, 2008. "Decentralization and Intergovernmental Finance in Japan," Finance Working Papers 23074, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    13. Linda McDowell, 2015. "Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography—The Lives of Others: Body Work, the Production of Difference, and Labor Geographies," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 91(1), pages 1-23, January.
    14. Andy C. Pratt, 2009. "Urban Regeneration: From the Arts `Feel Good' Factor to the Cultural Economy: A Case Study of Hoxton, London," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(5-6), pages 1041-1061, May.
    15. Fikri Zul Fahmi & Philip McCann & Sierdjan Koster, 2017. "Creative economy policy in developing countries: The case of Indonesia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(6), pages 1367-1384, May.
    16. Tasos Kitsos & Max Nathan & Diana Gutiérrez-Posada, 2025. "Don’t Shoot the Pianist: Creative Firms, Workers, and Neighborhood Gentrification," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 101(1), pages 60-85, January.
    17. Hatcher, William & Oyer, Matt & Gallardo, Roberto, 2011. "The Creative Class and Economic Development as Practiced in the Rural U.S. South: An Exploratory Survey of Economic Development Professionals," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 41(2,3), pages 139-159, Fall, Win.
    18. James J Gregory, 2016. "Creative industries and urban regeneration – The Maboneng precinct, Johannesburg," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 31(1-2), pages 158-171, February.
    19. Diane Charlton & J. Edward Taylor, 2020. "Rural school access and the agricultural transformation," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(5), pages 641-654, September.
    20. Kai Zhao & Yuesheng Zhang & Jinkai Zhao, 2020. "Exploring the Complexity of Location Choices of the Creative Class in Europe: Evidence from the EU Labor Force Survey 1995–2010," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6127-:d:1694437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.