IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9730-d625387.html

Environmental Sustainability of Creative Economy: Evidence from a Lithuanian Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Tomas Kačerauskas

    (Department of Philosophy and Cultural Studies, Faculty of Creative Industries, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Traku 1, LT-01132 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Dalia Streimikiene

    (Institute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University, Sporto Str. 6, LT-44221 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Rasa Bartkute

    (Kaunas Faculty, Vilnius University, Muitines 8, LT-44280 Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

The objective of the undertaken study is to investigate the sustainability of creative economy and present a case study providing the main findings on the linkages between creative economy and sustainable development. The in-depth literature review of the creative economy and sustainable development offered the main insights in the development of the case study hypotheses. A case study on the biggest music festival that was organised in Lithuania is provided. The findings confirm that creative economy can be environmentally sustainable, and the customers identified their clear preferences for sustainability criteria in music festivals; however, not all these preferences are properly addressed by the organisers of cultural events, as it was revealed by this case study. The results of a quantitative study show that the festival participants are increasingly expressing the need for sustainable music festivals, but organisers have not yet taken the necessary actions to address this need. It is likely that, in the near future, the festival organisers in Lithuania will have to start applying various sustainability criteria during the festivals in order to attract more visitors and generate more income from such events as well to ensure environmental safety. The practical implications of conducted study are equally important for all stakeholders, such as the community, policymakers, companies, and regulatory agencies that are concerned with the implementation of sustainable development practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomas Kačerauskas & Dalia Streimikiene & Rasa Bartkute, 2021. "Environmental Sustainability of Creative Economy: Evidence from a Lithuanian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9730-:d:625387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9730/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9730/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Throsby, 2015. "Development Strategies for Pacific Island Economies: Is There a Role for the Cultural Industries?," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(2), pages 370-382, May.
    2. Dalia Streimikiene & Asta Mikalauskiene & Ilona Kiausiene, 2019. "The Impact of Value Created by Culture on Approaching the Sustainable Development Goals: Case of the Baltic States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-25, November.
    3. Lauren Andres & Caroline Chapain, 2013. "The Integration of Cultural and Creative Industries into Local and Regional Development Strategies in Birmingham and Marseille: Towards an Inclusive and Collaborative Governance?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 161-182, February.
    4. Francesca Nocca, 2017. "The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Indicators as Decision-Making Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-28, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Panagiotis E. Petrakis & Anna-Maria Kanzola, 2022. "On the Micro-Foundations of Creative Economy: Life Satisfaction and Social Identity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Baptiste Gueniffey & Kei Sakamura, 2025. "Operationalization of the Creative City Concept in Japan: A Comparative Review with a Special Focus on Kanazawa and Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-30, July.
    3. Francisco J. Ferreiro-Seoane & Alicia Llorca-Ponce & Gregorio Rius-Sorolla, 2022. "Measuring the Sustainability of the Orange Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dalia Štreimikienė & Tomas Kačerauskas, 2020. "The creative economy and sustainable development: The Baltic States," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1632-1641, November.
    2. Christopher Meyer & Laima Gerlitz & Monika Klein, 2022. "Creativity as a Key Constituent for Smart Specialization Strategies (S3), What Is in It for Peripheral Regions? Co-creating Sustainable and Resilient Tourism with Cultural and Creative Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-31, March.
    3. Alina Betlej & Tomas Kačerauskas, 2021. "Urban Creative Sustainability: The Case of Lublin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Alessio D’Auria & Pasquale De Toro & Nicola Fierro & Elisa Montone, 2018. "Integration between GIS and Multi-Criteria Analysis for Ecosystem Services Assessment: A Methodological Proposal for the National Park of Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Hala Sirror, 2024. "Innovative Approaches to Windcatcher Design: A Review on Balancing Tradition Sustainability and Modern Technologies for Enhanced Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-27, November.
    6. Xiaozhen Guo & Meena Bhatia & Bhumika Gupta & Enrico Battisti, 2026. "Green project investments and corporate responsibilities: enablers, challenges, and strategies for mitigating risks," Post-Print hal-05280243, HAL.
    7. Nathalie Schieb-Bienfait & Anne-Laure Saives & Brigitte Charles-Pauvers & Sandrine Emin & Hélène Morteau, 2018. "Grouping and/or grounding : a closer look at cultural quarters and creative cluster management in Nantes (France)," Post-Print hal-02502524, HAL.
    8. Elena Gorbenkova & Elena Shcherbina, 2020. "Historical-Genetic Features in Rural Settlement System: A Case Study from Mogilev District (Mogilev Oblast, Belarus)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Laura James & David Guile, 2014. "Evaluating the transition from Regional Development Agencies to Local Economic Partnerships: The views of SMEs in the British West Midlands," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 29(3), pages 181-194, May.
    10. Yunxiang Ge & Cheng Lu & Han Gao, 2023. "Constructing an Indicator System for Cultural Sustainability in Chinese Cities under the Objective of Urban Renewal and Capability Measurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.
    11. Yurii Kharazishvili & Aleksy Kwilinski & Serhii Ivaniuta & Oleksandr Sukhodolia & Pawel Czart, 2025. "System of Indicators for the Environmental Component of Sustainable Development in the Security Dimension," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(S1), pages 146-160, November.
    12. Francesca Di Turo & Laura Medeghini, 2021. "How Green Possibilities Can Help in a Future Sustainable Conservation of Cultural Heritage in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, March.
    13. Daniel H. Mutibwa, 2022. "The (Un)Changing Political Economy of Arts, Cultural and Community Engagement, the Creative Economy and Place-Based Development during Austere Times," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, September.
    14. Carlos J. Pardo Abad, 2020. "Valuation of Industrial Heritage in Terms of Sustainability: Some Cases of Tourist Reference in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, November.
    15. Luigi Petti & Claudia Trillo & Busisiwe Ncube Makore, 2020. "Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development Targets: A Possible Harmonisation? Insights from the European Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    16. Saja Kosanović & Branislav Folić & Stefan Kovačević & Ivana Nikolić & Ljubiša Folić, 2019. "A Study on the Sustainability of the Traditional Sirinić Houses in the Šar Mountain Region, the South-Western Balkans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Mustafa Özgeriş & Neslihan Demircan & Ayşe Karahan & Oğuz Gökçe & Faris Karahan & Işık Sezen & Elif Akpınar Külekçi, 2024. "Cultural Heritage Management in the Context of Sustainable Tourism: The Case of Öşkvank Monastery (Uzundere, Erzurum)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    18. Gül Aktürk & Ahmadreza Shirvani Dastgerdi, 2021. "Cultural Landscapes under the Threat of Climate Change: A Systematic Study of Barriers to Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Hamza Alqudah & Mohammad Al-Qudah & Yazan Abu Huson & Abdalwali Lutfi & Mahmaod Alrawad & Mohammed Amin Almaiah, 2024. "A Decade of Green Economic Literature: An Analysis-Based Bibliometric," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 497-511, May.
    20. Eduardo Ordonez‐Ponce, 2023. "The role of local cultural factors in the achievement of the sustainable development goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 1122-1134, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9730-:d:625387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.