IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i22p6437-d287576.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Value Created by Culture on Approaching the Sustainable Development Goals: Case of the Baltic States

Author

Listed:
  • Dalia Streimikiene

    (Vilnius University Kaunas Faculty, Muitines 8, LT 44280 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Asta Mikalauskiene

    (Vilnius University Kaunas Faculty, Muitines 8, LT 44280 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Ilona Kiausiene

    (Vilnius University Kaunas Faculty, Muitines 8, LT 44280 Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

Culture plays an important role in implementing sustainability principles and approaching sustainable development goals across different countries. This paper aims to analyse the relationship between the value created by culture and the implementation of sustainable development goals of countries. The majority of attention in this research is devoted to composing and calculating the integrated cultural value index, which provides clear linkages between value created by culture and sustainable development goals. An expert survey was conducted, during which experts had to assess indicators by ranking them according to importance. There have been 14 indicators included in total to calculate the integrated cultural value index. The values created by culture in the selected Baltic States have been determined by calculating the weight coefficient of each indicator and providing a composite cultural value index. Statistical data analysis unquestionably confirms that cultural input when implementing sustainable development goals is significant, because there exists a very strong positive relationship between the cultural value index and achieved sustainable development goals in all three case studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Dalia Streimikiene & Asta Mikalauskiene & Ilona Kiausiene, 2019. "The Impact of Value Created by Culture on Approaching the Sustainable Development Goals: Case of the Baltic States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6437-:d:287576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6437/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6437/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pei-Hsuan Tsai & Chin-Tsai Lin, 2018. "How Should National Museums Create Competitive Advantage Following Changes in the Global Economic Environment?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Łukasz Wróblewski & Katarzyna Bilińska-Reformat & Mateusz Grzesiak, 2018. "Sustainable Activity of Cultural Service Consumers of Social Media Users—Influence on the Brand Capital of Cultural Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Mina Fanea-Ivanovici, 2018. "Culture as a Prerequisite for Sustainable Development. An Investigation into the Process of Cultural Content Digitisation in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Maria Rosario Perello-Marín & Gabriela Ribes-Giner & Odette Pantoja Díaz, 2018. "Enhancing Education for Sustainable Development in Environmental University Programmes: A Co-Creation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Sala, Serenella & Ciuffo, Biagio & Nijkamp, Peter, 2015. "A systemic framework for sustainability assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 314-325.
    6. Katriina Soini & Joost Dessein, 2016. "Culture-Sustainability Relation: Towards a Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-12, February.
    7. Swanson, Kristen K. & DeVereaux, Constance, 2017. "A theoretical framework for sustaining culture: Culturally sustainable entrepreneurship," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 78-88.
    8. Annie Tubadji & Frank Pelzel, 2015. "Culture based development: measuring an invisible resource using the PLS-PM method," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 42(12), pages 1050-1070, December.
    9. Susie Ruqun Wu & Peilei Fan & Jiquan Chen, 2016. "Incorporating Culture Into Sustainable Development: A Cultural Sustainability Index Framework for Green Buildings," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(1), pages 64-76, January.
    10. Francesca Nocca, 2017. "The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Indicators as Decision-Making Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-28, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aleksandra Bartosiewicz & Adam Kucharski, 2024. "Indicators of port sustainability: The example of Baltic Sea container ports," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2371-2384, June.
    2. Dalia Štreimikienė & Tomas Kačerauskas, 2020. "The creative economy and sustainable development: The Baltic States," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1632-1641, November.
    3. Matteo Trane & Luisa Marelli & Alice Siragusa & Riccardo Pollo & Patrizia Lombardi, 2023. "Progress by Research to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals in the EU: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-37, April.
    4. Tomas Kačerauskas & Dalia Streimikiene & Rasa Bartkute, 2021. "Environmental Sustainability of Creative Economy: Evidence from a Lithuanian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Christopher Meyer & Laima Gerlitz & Monika Klein, 2022. "Creativity as a Key Constituent for Smart Specialization Strategies (S3), What Is in It for Peripheral Regions? Co-creating Sustainable and Resilient Tourism with Cultural and Creative Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-31, March.
    6. Eduardo Ordonez‐Ponce, 2023. "The role of local cultural factors in the achievement of the sustainable development goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 1122-1134, April.
    7. Yunxiang Ge & Cheng Lu & Han Gao, 2023. "Constructing an Indicator System for Cultural Sustainability in Chinese Cities under the Objective of Urban Renewal and Capability Measurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.
    8. José Molina & Nguyen Viet Hai & Ping-Han Cheng & Chun-Yen Chang, 2021. "SDG’s Quality Education Approach: Comparative Analysis of Natural Sciences Curriculum Guidelines between Taiwan and Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Izabela Luiza Pop & Anca Borza & Anuța Buiga & Diana Ighian & Rita Toader, 2019. "Achieving Cultural Sustainability in Museums: A Step Toward Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Małgorzata Ćwikła & Anna Góral & Ewa Bogacz-Wojtanowska & Magdalena Dudkiewicz, 2020. "Project-Based Work and Sustainable Development—A Comparative Case Study of Cultural Animation Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Dalia Štreimikienė & Tomas Kačerauskas, 2020. "The creative economy and sustainable development: The Baltic States," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1632-1641, November.
    4. Lukman Yunus & Marsuki Iswandi & La Baco & Munirwan Zani & Muhammad Aswar Limi & Sujono Sujono, 2023. "How Does Sustainable Energy System, Creativity, and Green Finance affect Environment Efficiency and Sustainable Economic Growth: Evidence from Highest Emitting Economies," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(1), pages 261-270, January.
    5. Yulin Chen, 2019. "The Sustainable Development of Social Media Contents: An Analysis of Concrete and Abstract Information on Cultural and Creative Institutions with “Artist” and “Ordinary People” Positioning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Carmen Hidalgo-Giralt & Antonio Palacios-García & Diego Barrado-Timón & José Antonio Rodríguez-Esteban, 2021. "Urban Industrial Tourism: Cultural Sustainability as a Tool for Confronting Overtourism—Cases of Madrid, Brussels, and Copenhagen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, April.
    7. Luisa Errichiello & Roberto Micera, 2018. "Leveraging Smart Open Innovation for Achieving Cultural Sustainability: Learning from a New City Museum Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Alessio D’Auria & Pasquale De Toro & Nicola Fierro & Elisa Montone, 2018. "Integration between GIS and Multi-Criteria Analysis for Ecosystem Services Assessment: A Methodological Proposal for the National Park of Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, September.
    9. Małgorzata Wiścicka-Fernando & Sandra Misiak-Kwit & Kelaniyage Shihan Dilruk Fernando, 2019. "Co-Creation as an Innovative Way to Develop an Enterprise—Cross-Country Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-13, November.
    10. Hala Sirror, 2024. "Innovative Approaches to Windcatcher Design: A Review on Balancing Tradition Sustainability and Modern Technologies for Enhanced Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-27, November.
    11. Abdallah Alaoui & Moritz Hallama & Roger Bär & Ioanna Panagea & Felicitas Bachmann & Carola Pekrun & Luuk Fleskens & Ellen Kandeler & Rudi Hessel, 2022. "A New Framework to Assess Sustainability of Soil Improving Cropping Systems in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, May.
    12. Oriana Gava & Fabio Bartolini & Francesca Venturi & Gianluca Brunori & Angela Zinnai & Alberto Pardossi, 2018. "A Reflection of the Use of the Life Cycle Assessment Tool for Agri-Food Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Wende Wang & Mozhuang Fu & Qingwu Hu, 2020. "The Behavioral Pattern of Chinese Public Cultural Participation in Museums," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, April.
    14. David Tremblay & François Fortier & Jean‐François Boucher & Olivier Riffon & Claude Villeneuve, 2020. "Sustainable development goal interactions: An analysis based on the five pillars of the 2030 agenda," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1584-1596, November.
    15. Victoria Vicario-Modroño & Rosa Gallardo-Cobos & Pedro Sánchez-Zamora, 2023. "Sustainability evaluation of olive oil mills in Andalusia (Spain): a study based on composite indicators," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6363-6392, July.
    16. Annie Tubadji & Brian Osoba & Peter Nijkamp, 2015. "Culture-based development in the USA: culture as a factor for economic welfare and social well-being at a county level," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 39(3), pages 277-303, August.
    17. Çağla Beyaz & Çilen Erçin, 2023. "Evaluation of Modern Architecture Criteria in the Context of Sustainability and Architectural Approach; Modern Period in North Nicosia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-48, June.
    18. Elena Gorbenkova & Elena Shcherbina, 2020. "Historical-Genetic Features in Rural Settlement System: A Case Study from Mogilev District (Mogilev Oblast, Belarus)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    19. Rui Meng & Lirong Zhang & Hongkuan Zang & Shichao Jin, 2021. "Evaluation of Environmental and Economic Integrated Benefits of Photovoltaic Poverty Alleviation Technology in the Sanjiangyuan Region of Qinghai Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.
    20. Tsai, Pei-Hsuan & Lin, Guan-Yi & Zheng, Yu-Lin & Chen, Yi-Chong & Chen, Pao-Zhen & Su, Zheng-Cheng, 2020. "Exploring the effect of Starbucks' green marketing on consumers' purchase decisions from consumers’ perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6437-:d:287576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.