IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5877-d1687948.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Framework for Enhancing Social Interaction Through Improved Access to Recreational Parks in Residential Neighborhoods in the Saudi Context: Case Study of the Dammam Metropolitan Area

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulrahman Alnaim

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, College of Architecture and Planning, Imam Abdulrahman BinFaisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia)

  • Umar Lawal Dano

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, College of Architecture and Planning, Imam Abdulrahman BinFaisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ali M. Alqahtany

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, College of Architecture and Planning, Imam Abdulrahman BinFaisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Several studies in the literature have emphasized that public open spaces, such as recreational parks in residential neighborhoods, play a crucial role in enhancing social interaction among residents. As such, access to these parks is a key factor that may influence their use and, in turn, affect the quality of social engagement within the community. Traditional approaches to park accessibility, which focus solely on physical distance, have notable limitations, as proximity alone does not reliably predict park usage. Therefore, physical accessibility should be complemented by assessments of perceived or psychological accessibility. This study is designed to propose a framework for enhancing social interaction through improved access to recreational parks in the residential neighborhoods of the Dammam Metropolitan Area (DMA). It employs a mixed-methods approach comprising two primary methodologies: (1) observational behavioral mapping to identify key influencing factors based on user activities within the selected case study areas, and (2) an end-user questionnaire survey analyzed through inferential statistics, specifically Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), to assess residents’ perceptions of park accessibility and social interaction. The results indicate that adequate park maintenance significantly improves physical accessibility, while elements such as safety are essential for fostering psychological comfort. The ANOVA results yielded an F-value of 4.72 and a p -value of 0.00, confirming a statistically significant effect of the park’s physical features on facilitating social contact among local residents. The study presents a framework that integrates key demographic and social factors influencing park usage, advocating for infrastructure improvements aligned with user perceptions to foster greater community engagement. It highlights that addressing psychological barriers is just as important as making physical enhancements to achieve effective park accessibility. By combining physical design, demographic insights, and user experiences, the framework serves as a practical guide for planning inclusive and socially responsive public spaces. This research contributes to the fields of urban planning, social sustainability, and environmental psychology by offering localized insights and practical tools for implementation. Future research is recommended to further refine urban strategies that promote equitable access to recreational parks, particularly by addressing demographic-specific needs and psychological barriers that influence social interaction in open spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulrahman Alnaim & Umar Lawal Dano & Ali M. Alqahtany, 2025. "Framework for Enhancing Social Interaction Through Improved Access to Recreational Parks in Residential Neighborhoods in the Saudi Context: Case Study of the Dammam Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-37, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5877-:d:1687948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5877/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5877/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Reza Shirazi & Ramin Keivani, 2019. "The triad of social sustainability: Defining and measuring social sustainability of urban neighbourhoods," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 448-471, October.
    2. Seema Dave, 2011. "Neighbourhood density and social sustainability in cities of developing countries," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(3), pages 189-205, May/June.
    3. Assefa, G. & Frostell, B., 2007. "Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 63-78.
    4. Abdullatif Mohammed Alobaidallah & Ali Alqahtany & Khandoker M. Maniruzzaman, 2025. "Assessment of the Saher System in Enhancing Traffic Control and Road Safety: Insights from Experts for Dammam, Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Weibull, Jorgen W., 1976. "An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 357-379, December.
    6. Abdulrahman Alnaim & Umar Lawal Dano & Ali M. Alqahtany, 2025. "Factors Influencing Social Interaction in Recreational Parks in Residential Neighborhoods: A Case Study of the Dammam Metropolitan Area, Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-23, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sultana Razia & Siti Hajar Abu Bakar Ah, 2024. "The hidden story of megacities: revealing social sustainability status through residents’ satisfaction in Dhaka city, Bangladesh," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 24381-24413, September.
    2. Fredriksson, Anders & Macchione Saes, Maria Sylvia, 2025. "Quantifying political effects in the spatial allocation of public services," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Wilson, Christopher & van der Velden, Maja, 2022. "Sustainable AI: An integrated model to guide public sector decision-making," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Antoine Boche & Clément Foucher & Luiz Fernando Lavado Villa, 2022. "Understanding Microgrid Sustainability: A Systemic and Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, April.
    5. Naqavi, Fatemeh & Sundberg, Marcus & Västberg, Oskar Blom & Karlström, Anders & Hugosson, Muriel Beser, 2023. "Mobility constraints and accessibility to work: Application to Stockholm," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Joanna Borowczyk, 2018. "Sustainable Urban Development: Spatial Analyses as Novel Tools for Planning a Universally Designed City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Mohíno, Inmaculada & Ureña, José M. & Solís, Eloy, 2016. "Transport infrastructure and territorial cohesion in rural metro-adjacent regions: A multimodal accessibility approach. The case of Castilla-La Mancha in the context of Madrid (Spain)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 115-133.
    8. Fredriksson, Anders, 2017. "Location-allocation of public services – Citizen access, transparency and measurement. A method and evidence from Brazil and Sweden," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-12.
    9. Iqbal Hamiduddin & Daniel Fitzpatrick & Rebekah Plueckhahn & Uurtsaikh Sangi & Enkhjin Batjargal & Erdenetsogt Sumiyasuren, 2021. "Social Sustainability and Ulaanbaatar’s ‘Ger Districts’: Access and Mobility Issues and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Kanuganti, Shalini & Sarkar, Ashoke Kumar & Singh, Ajit Pratap, 2016. "Evaluation of access to health care in rural areas using enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) method," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 45-52.
    11. Ana Beatriz Hernández-Lara & Juan Pablo Gonzales-Bustos & Amado Alarcón-Alarcón, 2021. "Social Sustainability on Corporate Boards: The Effects of Female Family Members on R&D," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    12. Ponce, Pedro & Polasko, Kenneth & Molina, Arturo, 2016. "End user perceptions toward smart grid technology: Acceptance, adoption, risks, and trust," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 587-598.
    13. Hege Hofstad & Christel Dahl & Kjersti Følling & Kostas Mouratidis & Bent Olav Olsen & Stine Busborg Sagen & Hilde Hatleskog Zeiner, 2025. "Community Social Sustainability: Unpacking the Concept for Urban Governance and Planning," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 3970-3984, June.
    14. Christopher F Baum & Hans Lööf & Pardis Nabavi, 2019. "Innovation strategies, external knowledge and productivity growth," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 348-367, March.
    15. Sara Johansson, 2014. "The influence of knowledge on firms’ export decisions," Chapters, in: Charlie Karlsson & Börje Johansson & Kiyoshi Kobayashi & Roger R. Stough (ed.), Knowledge, Innovation and Space, chapter 5, pages 103-138, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Olof Ejermo & Katrin Hussinger & Basheer Kalash & Torben Schubert, 2022. "Innovation in Malmö after the Öresund Bridge," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 5-20, January.
    17. Víctor Muñoz Sanz & Sara Romero Muñoz & Teresa Sánchez Chaparro & Lorena Bello Gómez & Tanja Herdt, 2022. "Making Green Work: Implementation Strategies in a New Generation of Urban Forests," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 202-213.
    18. Mikelis Grivins & Talis Tisenkopfs & Zaklina Stojanovic & Bojan Ristic, 2016. "A Comparative Analysis of the Social Performance of Global and Local Berry Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Recker, W. W. & Chen, C. & McNally, M. G., 2000. "Measuring the impact of efficient household travel decisions on potential travel time savings and accessibility gains," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1qq2t12b, University of California Transportation Center.
    20. Gråsjö, Urban, 2004. "The Importance of Accessibility to R&D on Patent Production in Swedish Municipalities," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 19, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5877-:d:1687948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.