IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5826-d1686627.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Airline Performance: An Integrated Balanced Scorecard-Based MEREC-CoCoSo Model

Author

Listed:
  • Melik Ertuğrul

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Galatasaray University, Çırağan Cad. No:36, Istanbul 34349, Türkiye)

  • Eylül Özdarak

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Galatasaray University, Çırağan Cad. No:36, Istanbul 34349, Türkiye)

Abstract

The assessment of company performance requires a holistic approach, encompassing both financial and non-financial metrics. Accordingly, we develop a comprehensive airline performance evaluation model utilizing the Balanced Scorecard (BSC)-based multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework. Based on contingency theory, we use 30 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) derived from the literature and develop a novel performance model by combining the BSC framework with the Method based on the Removal Effects of Criteria (MEREC) for KPI weighting and the Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) for ranking. The focus on Turkish Airlines, serving as a comparative benchmark, over the period 2020–2023 reveals that while financial KPIs hold the greatest weight, non-financial KPIs have the most significant impact on performance. The lowest performance is recorded in 2020, most probably attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic, followed by a remarkable recovery in 2021. We offer a methodological contribution for managers, decision-makers, and scholars—an objective, data-driven tool to assess airline performance. Furthermore, we furnish policymakers with tangible data for more effective industrial incentives and convenient regulatory strategies. In contrast to most of the literature emphasizing financial indicators and subjective weighting approaches that might yield biased rankings, we suggest a novel integrated performance evaluation model tailored for the airline industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Melik Ertuğrul & Eylül Özdarak, 2025. "Measuring Airline Performance: An Integrated Balanced Scorecard-Based MEREC-CoCoSo Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-25, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5826-:d:1686627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5826/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5826/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Bouwens & Ties de Kok & Arnt Verriest, 2019. "The Prevalence and Validity of EBITDA as a Performance Measure," ACCRA, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 25(1), pages 55-105.
    2. Heidi Sundin & Markus Granlund & David Brown, 2010. "Balancing Multiple Competing Objectives with a Balanced Scorecard," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 203-246.
    3. Morteza Yazdani & Pascale Zaraté & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Zenonas Turskis, 2019. "A Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems," Post-Print hal-02879091, HAL.
    4. Eilat, Harel & Golany, Boaz & Shtub, Avraham, 2008. "R&D project evaluation: An integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 895-912, October.
    5. Mohamad Shahiir Saidin & Lai Soon Lee & Siti Mahani Marjugi & Muhammad Zaini Ahmad & Hsin-Vonn Seow, 2023. "Fuzzy Method Based on the Removal Effects of Criteria (MEREC) for Determining Objective Weights in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Nazli Ersoy, 2023. "Applying an integrated data-driven weighting system – CoCoSo approach for financial performance evaluation of Fortune 500 companies," E&M Economics and Management, Technical University of Liberec, Faculty of Economics, vol. 26(3), pages 92-108, September.
    7. Ferah Yildiz & Faruk Dayi & Mustafa Yucel & Ali Cilesiz, 2024. "The Impact of ESG Criteria on Firm Value: A Strategic Analysis of the Airline Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-23, September.
    8. de Camargo Fiorini, Paula & Roman Pais Seles, Bruno Michel & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Barberio Mariano, Enzo & de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes, 2018. "Management theory and big data literature: From a review to a research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 112-129.
    9. Jan Bouwens & Ties de Kok & Arnt Verriest, 2019. "The Prevalence and Validity of EBITDA as a Performance Measure," Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 25(1), pages 55-105.
    10. Stepanyan Armen, 2013. "Performance Assessment Of Major U.S. Airlines Via Cash Flow Ratios," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 398-408, December.
    11. Hofer, Christian & Dresner, Martin E. & Windle, Robert J., 2009. "The impact of airline financial distress on US air fares: A contingency approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 238-249, January.
    12. Babatunde A. OKUNEYE & Oluwatosin O. OGUNYOMI-OLUYOMI, 2022. "The Role of Digitalization in the Airline Industry Performance AMID COVID-19: Evidence from Emirate Airline Balanced Scorecard Performence," Business & Management Compass, University of Economics Varna, issue 1-2, pages 365-379.
    13. Phang, Sock-Yong, 2016. "A general framework for price regulation of airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 39-45.
    14. Lu, Ming-Tsang & Hsu, Chao-Che & Liou, James J.H. & Lo, Huai-Wei, 2018. "A hybrid MCDM and sustainability-balanced scorecard model to establish sustainable performance evaluation for international airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 9-19.
    15. Hoque, Zahirul, 2014. "20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 33-59.
    16. Capobianco, Heloisa Márcia Pires & Fernandes, Elton, 2004. "Capital structure in the world airline industry," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 421-434, July.
    17. Abdel-Kader, Magdy & Luther, Robert, 2008. "The impact of firm characteristics on management accounting practices: A UK-based empirical analysis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 2-27.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos Suárez‐Gargallo & Patrocinio Zaragoza‐Sáez, 2023. "Port Authority of Cartagena: Evidence of a Sustainability Balanced Scorecard," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 3761-3785, October.
    2. Ryan J. Casey & George W. Ruch, 2024. "Are earnings better than cash flows at predicting future cash flows? Evidence from apples-to-apples comparisons," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 3218-3257, December.
    3. Claudia Arena & Simona Catuogno & Nicola Moscariello, 2021. "The unusual debate on non-GAAP reporting in the current standard practice. The lens of corporate governance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(3), pages 655-684, September.
    4. Xiaohang Ren & Wenqi Li & Xu Cheng & Xinwei Zheng, 2024. "Economic freedom and corporate carbon emissions: International evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8388-8412, December.
    5. Mattia Iotti & Elisa Manghi & Giuseppe Bonazzi, 2024. "Debt Sustainability Assessment in the Biogas Sector: Application of Interest Coverage Ratios in a Sample of Agricultural Firms in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-34, March.
    6. Joanna Toborek-Mazur & Magdalena Wójcik-Jurkiewicz, 2022. "Multi-Energy Concern as an Example of the Implementation of Agenda 2030: Poland as a Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Jitender Kumar & Neha Prince & H. Kent Baker, 2022. "Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Issues," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 11(2), pages 147-161, June.
    8. Lihki Rubio & Alejandro J. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez & Manuel G. Forero, 2021. "EBITDA Index Prediction Using Exponential Smoothing and ARIMA Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Corinne Bessieux-Ollier & Grégoire Davrinche & Guillaume Dumas, 2022. "L'adaptation de la communication financière face à la crise COVID : le cas des résultats non-GAAP," Post-Print hal-03948560, HAL.
    10. Bang, You-Young & Lee, Dae Sung & Lim, Seong-Rin, 2019. "Analysis of corporate CO2 and energy cost efficiency: The role of performance indicators and effective environmental reporting," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    11. Pavol Durana & Katarina Valaskova & Roman Blazek & Jozef Palo, 2022. "Metamorphoses of Earnings in the Transport Sector of the V4 Region," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, April.
    12. Tomáš Zahradníček, 2024. "Non-IFRS Earnings Measures in Annual Reports of European Companies," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2024(2), pages 21-43.
    13. Corinne Bessieux-Ollier & Grégoire Davrinche & Guillaume Dumas, 2022. "L'adaptation de la communication financière face à la crise COVID : le cas des résultats non-GAAP," Post-Print hal-03948567, HAL.
    14. Ralph Kober & Deryl Northcott, 2021. "Testing cause‐and‐effect relationships within a balanced scorecard," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 1815-1849, April.
    15. Rudy Setyopurnomo & Sudarso Kaderi Wiryono & Yuliani Dwi Lestari & Subiakto Sukarno, 2025. "Incorporating earned value management into income statements to improve project management profitability and elevate application in the business and management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-30, January.
    16. Richard Yeaw Chong Seow, 2023. "Comparative Financial Performance and Firm Valuation Analysis: A Malaysian Logistics Service Provider Case Study," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(7), pages 594-613, July.
    17. Khezrimotlagh, Dariush & Kaffash, Sepideh & Zhu, Joe, 2022. "U.S. airline mergers’ performance and productivity change," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    18. Li, Yan-Lai & Tang, Jia-Fu & Chin, Kwai-Sang & Jiang, Yu-Shi & Han, Yi & Pu, Yun, 2011. "Estimating the final priority ratings of engineering characteristics in mature-period product improvement by MDBA and AHP," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 575-586, June.
    19. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2018. "Sustainability Balanced Scorecards and their Architectures: Irrelevant or Misunderstood?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 937-952, July.
    20. Luis Jesús Córdova-Aguirre & Juan Manuel Ramón-Jerónimo, 2024. "Designing a Sustainability Assessment Framework for Peruvian Manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises Applying the Stakeholder Theory Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5826-:d:1686627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.