IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5553-d1680557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Leading to the Digital Transformation Dead Zone in Shipping SMEs: A Dynamic Capability Theory Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Thanh-Nhat-Lai Nguyen

    (Faculty of Business Administration, Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam)

  • Son-Tung Le

    (Faculty of Economics, Vietnam Maritime University, Haiphong 180000, Vietnam)

Abstract

Digital transformation (DT) has become a crucial driver of competitiveness in the shipping industry. However, many small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) encounter barriers that result in digital transformation dead zones (DTDZs), where digital initiatives stagnate or fail to achieve the expected outcomes. This study investigates the key factors contributing to digital stagnation specifically within Vietnamese shipping SMEs, adopting the lens of the dynamic capabilities theory (DCT)—a framework that emphasizes firms’ abilities to sense opportunities, seize them, and reconfigure resources to maintain competitiveness in rapidly evolving environments. The DCT provides a dynamic and process-oriented perspective on how organizations adapt to technological change by building flexible and integrative capabilities. Based on quantitative data collected from 588 respondents across the Vietnamese shipping sector, the study employed structural equation modeling (SEM) to empirically assess the relationships among critical digital transformation variables. The findings reveal that inadequate sensing capabilities and a lack of data analytics are the most significant barriers, limiting firms’ ability to identify and act on digital opportunities. Additionally, limited ecosystem collaboration and supply chain fragmentation further exacerbate digital inertia. While poor reconfiguration capabilities and weak seizing capabilities also contribute to digital stagnation, their effects are comparatively weaker. The study offers theoretical contributions by extending the DCT, the resource-based view (RBV), and the ecosystem theory to the maritime sector, emphasizing the interplay between organizational, technological, and external barriers. Practical implications highlight the need for strategic investments in data analytics, ecosystem collaboration, and adaptive leadership to overcome digital stagnation.

Suggested Citation

  • Thanh-Nhat-Lai Nguyen & Son-Tung Le, 2025. "Factors Leading to the Digital Transformation Dead Zone in Shipping SMEs: A Dynamic Capability Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-32, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5553-:d:1680557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5553/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5553/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marija Jović & Edvard Tijan & Doroteja Vidmar & Andreja Pucihar, 2022. "Factors of Digital Transformation in the Maritime Transport Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    2. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    3. Asterios Stroumpoulis & Evangelia Kopanaki & Panos T. Chountalas, 2024. "Enhancing Sustainable Supply Chain Management through Digital Transformation: A Comparative Case Study Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-29, August.
    4. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    5. Plekhanov, Dmitry & Franke, Henrik & Netland, Torbjørn H., 2023. "Digital transformation: A review and research agenda," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 821-844.
    6. Guandalini, Ilaria, 2022. "Sustainability through digital transformation: A systematic literature review for research guidance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 456-471.
    7. Shahriar Akter & Saida Sultana & Angappa Gunasekaran & Ruwan J. Bandara & Shah J Miah, 2024. "Tackling the global challenges using data-driven innovations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 333(2), pages 517-532, February.
    8. Kolagar, Milad & Parida, Vinit & Sjödin, David, 2022. "Ecosystem transformation for digital servitization: A systematic review, integrative framework, and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 176-200.
    9. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    10. Wójcik, Piotr & Obłój, Krzysztof & Buono, Anthony F., 2022. "Addressing social concern through business-nonprofit collaboration: Microfoundations of a firm’s dynamic capability for social responsibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 119-139.
    11. Quanjun Zhang & Jian Chen & Xiangyu Zhang, 2024. "Enterprise digitization and marine economic performance: An empirical study of listed enterprises in China’s maritime economy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Tijan, Edvard & Jović, Marija & Aksentijević, Saša & Pucihar, Andreja, 2021. "Digital transformation in the maritime transport sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    13. Konstantinos Poulis & Gregorios C. Galanakis & Gregory T. Triantafillou & Efthimios Poulis, 2020. "Value migration: digitalization of shipping as a mechanism of industry dethronement," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Trung-Hieu Nguyen, 2024. "Investigating Driving Factors of Digital Transformation in the Vietnam Shipping Companies: Applied for TOE Framework," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chirumalla, Koteshwar & Leoni, Luna & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2023. "Moving from servitization to digital servitization: Identifying the required dynamic capabilities and related microfoundations to facilitate the transition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Valero-Gil, Jesús & Suárez-Perales, Inés & Garcés-Ayerbe, Concepción & Rivera-Torres, Pilar, 2024. "Navigating toward the promised land of digitalization and sustainability convergence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    3. Wang, Shaofeng & Zhang, Hao, 2025. "Enhancing SMEs sustainable innovation and performance through digital transformation: Insights from strategic technology, organizational dynamics, and environmental adaptation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Scherrer, Aline & Rogge, Karoline S., 2025. "When do incumbents adopt radical net-zero technologies? Analysing differences in strategy trajectories of European truck manufacturers towards alternative vehicle technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    5. FeCheng Ma & Farhan Khan & Kashif Ullah Khan & Si XiangYun, 2021. "Investigating the Impact of Information Technology, Absorptive Capacity, and Dynamic Capabilities on Firm Performance: An Empirical Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    6. Francisco Gustavo Bautista Carrillo & Daniel Arias-Aranda, 2025. "Technological Adoption Sequences and Sustainable Innovation Performance: A Longitudinal Analysis of Optimal Pathways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-24, June.
    7. Kim, Jongwook & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2008. "A Strategic Theory of the Firm as a Nexus of Incomplete Contracts: A Property Rights Approach," Working Papers 08-0108, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    8. Zhonghua Zhao & Fanchen Meng & Yin He & Zhouyang Gu, 2019. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Competitive Advantage with Multiple Mediations from Social Capital and Dynamic Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Hélène Laurell & Leona Achtenhagen & Svante Andersson, 2017. "The changing role of network ties and critical capabilities in an international new venture’s early development," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 113-140, March.
    10. Jim Andersén, 2023. "Green resource orchestration: A critical appraisal of the use of resource orchestration in environmental management research, and a research agenda for future study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5506-5520, December.
    11. Sjödin, David & Liljeborg, Alexander & Mutter, Sermed, 2024. "Conceptualizing ecosystem management capabilities: Managing the ecosystem-organization interface," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    12. Jantunen, Ari & Tarkiainen, Anssi & Chari, Simos & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2018. "Dynamic capabilities, operational changes, and performance outcomes in the media industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 251-257.
    13. Yi-Ju Lo & Tung Hung, 2015. "Structure offshoring and returns on offshoring," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 443-479, June.
    14. von den Driesch, Till & Eva Susanne da Costa, Maika & Christina Flatten, Tessa & Brettel, Malte, 2015. "How CEO experience, personality, and network affect firms' dynamic capabilities," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 245-256.
    15. Kazadi, Kande & Lievens, Annouk & Mahr, Dominik, 2016. "Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 525-540.
    16. Quan Anh Nguyen & Gillian Sullivan Mort, 0. "Conceptualising organisational-level and microfoundational capabilities: an integrated view of born-globals’ internationalisation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    17. Nadia Zahoor & Huda Khan & Zaheer Khan & Pervaiz Akhtar, 2024. "Responsible innovation in emerging markets’ SMEs: The role of alliance learning and absorptive capacity," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 1175-1209, September.
    18. Chang, Kuo-Hsiung & Gotcher, Donald F., 2020. "How and when does co-production facilitate eco-innovation in international buyer-supplier relationships? The role of environmental innovation ambidexterity and institutional pressures," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    19. C. Lakshman & Sangeetha Lakshman & Kubilay Gok, 2023. "Managers’ knowledge and customer-focused knowledge management as dynamic capabilities: implications for innovation performance," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 246-274, February.
    20. Amandine Maus & Sylvie Sammut, 2018. "Business model innovation in incubators: the role played by dynamic capabilities theory," Post-Print hal-02466175, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5553-:d:1680557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.