IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5518-d1679652.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transforming Agriculture for a Sustainable Future: Economic, Ethical, and Environmental Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Delia-Mioara Popescu

    (Doctoral School of Economics and Humanities, Valahia University of Targoviste, 13 Sinaia Alley, 130004 Targoviste, Romania)

  • Mircea-Constantin Duica

    (Faculty of Economics, Valahia University of Targoviste, 13 Sinaia Alley, 130004 Targoviste, Romania)

  • Nicoleta-Mihaela Duta (Ghita)

    (Doctoral School of Economics and Humanities, Valahia University of Targoviste, 13 Sinaia Alley, 130004 Targoviste, Romania)

  • Anisoara Duica

    (Doctoral School of Economics and Humanities, Valahia University of Targoviste, 13 Sinaia Alley, 130004 Targoviste, Romania)

  • Cristina-Maria Voinea

    (Faculty of Economics, Valahia University of Targoviste, 13 Sinaia Alley, 130004 Targoviste, Romania)

  • George Stanescu

    (Doctoral School of Economics and Humanities, Valahia University of Targoviste, 13 Sinaia Alley, 130004 Targoviste, Romania)

Abstract

The agricultural sector stands at the intersection of economic, ethical, and environmental concerns, presenting complex challenges for sustainable development. This study investigates how ethical attitudes, conceptualized at political (e.g., perceptions of transparency, anti-corruption, and policy fairness) and social levels (e.g., community engagement, labor standards, and social equity), influence ethical behavior within Romanian agricultural organizations. Additionally, it explores the impact of sector-specific and organizational ethics on the adoption of social responsibility (SR) practices. Using a quantitative research approach, the study employed a structured questionnaire covering four key dimensions: political and social ethics, corporate responsibility, environmental sustainability, and ethical management in agriculture. The findings suggested that Romanian agricultural companies could improve their long-term competitiveness by incorporating ethical governance, sustainable business practices, and stakeholder engagement into their strategic frameworks. These findings suggest that Romanian agricultural companies can enhance their long-term competitiveness by embedding ethical governance, sustainable business models, and active stakeholder engagement into their strategic frameworks. This research contributes to the theoretical discourse by demonstrating how contextual ethical attitudes influence SR, providing a nuanced understanding of the interplay between economic performance, social equity, and environmental responsibility in an emerging economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Delia-Mioara Popescu & Mircea-Constantin Duica & Nicoleta-Mihaela Duta (Ghita) & Anisoara Duica & Cristina-Maria Voinea & George Stanescu, 2025. "Transforming Agriculture for a Sustainable Future: Economic, Ethical, and Environmental Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5518-:d:1679652
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5518/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5518/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weilun Huang & Xucheng Wang, 2024. "The Impact of Technological Innovations on Agricultural Productivity and Environmental Sustainability in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-37, September.
    2. Puiu-Lucian Georgescu & Nicoleta Barbuta-Misu & Monica Laura Zlati & Costinela Fortea & Valentin Marian Antohi, 2025. "Quantifying the Performance of European Agriculture Through the New European Sustainability Model," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-29, January.
    3. Kenneth M. Amaeshi & Onyeka K. Osuji & Paul Nnodim, 2008. "Corporate Social Responsibility in Supply Chains of Global Brands: A Boundaryless Responsibility? Clarifications, Exceptions and Implications," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 223-234, August.
    4. Marco Lerro & Maria Raimondo & Marcello Stanco & Concetta Nazzaro & Giuseppe Marotta, 2019. "Cause Related Marketing among Millennial Consumers: The Role of Trust and Loyalty in the Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Angélique Catharina Elford & Claus-Heinrich Daub, 2019. "Solutions for SMEs Challenged by CSR: A Multiple Cases Approach in the Food Industry within the DACH-Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-31, August.
    6. Wen-Shin Huang & Tzung-You Tsai & Kung-Ling Lai & Han-Shen Chen, 2024. "Analyzing Consumer Motivations and Behaviors Towards Upcycled Food from an Environmental Sustainability Perspective," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Pucci, Tommaso & Casprini, Elena & Galati, Antonino & Zanni, Lorenzo, 2020. "The virtuous cycle of stakeholder engagement in developing a sustainability culture: Salcheto winery," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 364-376.
    8. Hamid El Bilali & Carola Strassner & Tarek Ben Hassen, 2021. "Sustainable Agri-Food Systems: Environment, Economy, Society, and Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-67, June.
    9. Metzger, Michael & Dalton, Dan R. & Hill, John W., 1993. "The Organization of Ethics and the Ethics of Organizations: The Case for Expanded Organizational Ethics Audits," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(01), pages 27-44, January.
    10. Selma Kadic-Maglajlic & Milena Micevski & Nick Lee & Nathaniel Boso & Irena Vida, 2019. "Three Levels of Ethical Influences on Selling Behavior and Performance: Synergies and Tensions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 377-397, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Concetta Nazzaro & Marcello Stanco & Giuseppe Marotta, 2020. "The Life Cycle of Corporate Social Responsibility in Agri-Food: Value Creation Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Stephen Chen, 2009. "Corporate Responsibilities in Internet-Enabled Social Networks," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(4), pages 523-536, December.
    3. Bonoua Faye & Hélène Véronique Marie Thérèse Faye & Guoming Du & Yongfang Ma & Jeanne Colette Diéne & Edmée Mbaye & Liane Marie Thérèse Judith Faye & Yao Dinard Kouadio & Yuheng Li & Henri Marcel Seck, 2025. "Rural Development and Dynamics of Enhancing Agricultural Productivity in Senegal: Challenges, Opportunities, and Policy Implications," World, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Prema-chandra Athukorala & Raveen Ekanayake, 2014. "Repositioning in the Global Apparel Value Chain in the Post-MFA Era: Strategic Issues and Evidence from Sri Lanka," Departmental Working Papers 2014-17, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    5. Pepe, Cosetta & Musso, Fabio & Risso, Mario, 2009. "Retailers and SME suppliers social responsibility in international supply chains," MPRA Paper 31112, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Muel Kaptein, 2015. "The Effectiveness of Ethics Programs: The Role of Scope, Composition, and Sequence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 415-431, December.
    7. Xia Zhao & Ning Li & Liang Song, 2019. "Coordination of a Socially Responsible Two-Stage Supply Chain Under Random Demand," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(05), pages 1-27, October.
    8. Hsueh, Che-Fu, 2014. "Improving corporate social responsibility in a supply chain through a new revenue sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 214-222.
    9. Mark Groza & Mya Pronschinske & Matthew Walker, 2011. "Perceived Organizational Motives and Consumer Responses to Proactive and Reactive CSR," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(4), pages 639-652, September.
    10. Lingling Xu & Danai Tanamee & Suppanunta Romprasert, 2025. "Does Digital Village Construction Promote Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity? An Empirical Study Based on China’s Provincial Panel Data," Economies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-27, March.
    11. Fu Jia & Yan Jiang, 2018. "Sustainable Global Sourcing: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, February.
    12. Elena Casprini & Rocco Palumbo & Jacopo Cammeo & Lorenzo Zanni, 2025. "A ‘Grey’ Side of Family Business Ethics? Looking into the Interplay of Internal and External Ethical Orientations: Empirical Insights from the Wine Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(4), pages 749-770, May.
    13. Kumar, Patanjal & Baraiya, Rajendra & Das, Debashree & Jakhar, Suresh Kumar & Xu, Lei & Mangla, Sachin Kumar, 2021. "Social responsibility and cost-learning in dyadic supply chain coordination," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    14. Mubariz Mammadli, 2022. "Environmentally Responsible Business Approaches in Azerbaijan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, May.
    15. Fei Lv, 2023. "Pricing and corporate social responsibility investment strategies for a manufacturer under information asymmetry," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(6), pages 3215-3232, September.
    16. Yong Liu & Bing-ting Quan & Jiao Li & Jeffrey Yi-Lin Forrest, 2018. "A Supply Chain Coordination Mechanism with Cost Sharing of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-25, April.
    17. Shuchen Ni & Chun Feng & Handan Gou, 2023. "Nash-Bargaining Fairness Concerns under Push and Pull Supply Chains," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-20, November.
    18. Marcello Stanco & Concetta Nazzaro & Marco Lerro & Giuseppe Marotta, 2020. "Sustainable Collective Innovation in the Agri-Food Value Chain: The Case of the “Aureo” Wheat Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    19. Marco Lerro & Giuseppe Marotta & Concetta Nazzaro, 2020. "Measuring consumers’ preferences for craft beer attributes through Best-Worst Scaling," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Chi-Shiun Lai & Chih-Jen Chiu & Chin-Fang Yang & Da-Chang Pai, 2010. "The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Brand Performance: The Mediating Effect of Industrial Brand Equity and Corporate Reputation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 457-469, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5518-:d:1679652. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.