IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5394-d1676757.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Circular Economy Development in the Shipping Sector in Finland

Author

Listed:
  • Roope Husgafvel

    (Independent Researcher, 04310 Tuusula, Finland)

Abstract

The world is facing unprecedented sustainability challenges, and the circular economy (CE) can provide some solutions to promote more sustainable practices among companies. This study aimed at exploring, discovering, analyzing and synthetizing approaches related to the 10R principles, the CE principles and CE business models in the shipping sector in Finland. The research approach was based on qualitative research that aimed at identifying approaches related to the selected three main elements: (1) the 10R principles; (2) the CE principles; and (3) CE business models. The findings of this study suggest that most approaches that were identified were related to the following 10R principles: (1) replacement of products or making of products redundant (R0); (2) rethinking of products (R1); and (3) reduction in the use of resources in the manufacturing and use of products (R2). Only a few approaches could be identified that were related to the reuse of products (R3), the recycling of materials (R8) and recovery of materials (R9). There were typically no or only a few approaches identified that were related to the repair of products (R4), refurbishment of products (R5), remanufacturing of products (R6) and repurposing of products and their parts (R7). For many companies, there were no identified approaches related to the R3–R7 principles. Regarding the CE principles, the findings of this study suggest that quite a number of approaches were identified that were related to the circulation of products and materials and that many approaches were identified that were related to the elimination of waste and pollution. Typically only a few approaches were identified for the regeneration of nature. Regarding the CE business models, the findings suggest that quite a number of approaches were identified that were related to the circular supply models, supply chains and inputs, and there were many approaches for resource recovery. Only a few approaches were identified that were related to product use/life extension, sharing and sharing platforms, and product-as-a-service and product-service systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Roope Husgafvel, 2025. "Circular Economy Development in the Shipping Sector in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-48, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5394-:d:1676757
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5394/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5394/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marta Mańkowska & Izabela Kotowska & Michał Pluciński, 2020. "Seaports as Nodal Points of Circular Supply Chains: Opportunities and Challenges for Secondary Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Massimiliano Borrello & Stefano Pascucci & Luigi Cembalo, 2020. "Three Propositions to Unify Circular Economy Research: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Elvira Haezendonck & Karel Van den Berghe, 2020. "Patterns of Circular Transition: What Is the Circular Economy Maturity of Belgian Ports?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Roope Husgafvel, 2021. "Exploring Social Sustainability Handprint—Part 2: Sustainable Development and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-35, October.
    5. Hermann, Roberto Rivas & Pansera, Mario & Nogueira, Leticia Antunes & Monteiro, Marko, 2022. "Socio-technical imaginaries of a circular economy in governmental discourse and among science, technology, and innovation actors: A Norwegian case study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    6. Tzay-An Shiau & Chia-Chin Chuang, 2015. "Social construction of port sustainability indicators: a case study of Keelung Port," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 26-42, January.
    7. Manuel Herrador & Tran Tho Dat & Dinh Duc Truong & Le Thu Hoa & Katarzyna Å obacz, 2023. "The Unique Case Study of Circular Economy in Vietnam Remarking Recycling Craft Villages," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    8. Assunta Di Vaio & Luisa Varriale & Maria Lekakou & Evangelia Stefanidaki, 2021. "Cruise and container shipping companies: a comparative analysis of sustainable development goals through environmental sustainability disclosure," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 184-212, February.
    9. Toby Roberts & Ian Williams & John Preston & Nick Clarke & Melinda Odum & Stefanie O'Gorman, 2021. "A Virtuous Circle? Increasing Local Benefits from Ports by Adopting Circular Economy Principles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    10. Rebeka Kovačič Lukman & Kristijan Brglez & Damjan Krajnc, 2022. "A Conceptual Model for Measuring a Circular Economy of Seaports: A Case Study on Antwerp and Koper Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Tomas Santa‐Maria & Walter J. V. Vermeulen & Rupert J. Baumgartner, 2022. "How do incumbent firms innovate their business models for the circular economy? Identifying micro‐foundations of dynamic capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1308-1333, May.
    12. Kamanamaikalani Beamer & Axel Tuma & Andrea Thorenz & Sandra Boldoczki & Keliʻiahonui Kotubetey & Kanekoa Kukea-Shultz & Kawena Elkington, 2021. "Reflections on Sustainability Concepts: Aloha ʻĀina and the Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    13. John Devlin & Keri Hopeward & James Hopeward & Christopher Saint, 2023. "Leading the Circular Future: South Australia’s Potential Influence on Circular Economy Development in Asia-Pacific Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-13, September.
    14. Chin-Shan Lu & Kuo-Chung Shang & Chi-Chang Lin, 2016. "Examining sustainability performance at ports: port managers’ perspectives on developing sustainable supply chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 909-927, November.
    15. Mansouri, S. Afshin & Lee, Habin & Aluko, Oluwakayode, 2015. "Multi-objective decision support to enhance environmental sustainability in maritime shipping: A review and future directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 3-18.
    16. Antonia Gravagnuolo & Mariarosaria Angrisano & Luigi Fusco Girard, 2019. "Circular Economy Strategies in Eight Historic Port Cities: Criteria and Indicators Towards a Circular City Assessment Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-24, June.
    17. Roope Husgafvel, 2021. "Exploring Social Sustainability Handprint—Part 1: Handprint and Life Cycle Thinking and Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-36, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Damoon Razmjooei & Moslem Alimohammadlou & Habib-Allah Ranaei Kordshouli & Kazem Askarifar, 2024. "A bibliometric analysis of the literature on circular economy and sustainability in maritime studies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 5509-5536, March.
    2. Rebeka Kovačič Lukman & Kristijan Brglez & Damjan Krajnc, 2022. "A Conceptual Model for Measuring a Circular Economy of Seaports: A Case Study on Antwerp and Koper Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Toby Roberts & Ian Williams & John Preston & Nick Clarke & Melinda Odum & Stefanie O'Gorman, 2021. "A Virtuous Circle? Increasing Local Benefits from Ports by Adopting Circular Economy Principles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    4. Raja Oloan Saut Gurning & Daniel Imanuel Tangkau, 2022. "The Analysis of the Conceptual Framework of Green Port Implementation in Indonesia Using Circular Economy: The Case Study of Benoa Public and Fishing Terminals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    5. X. I. Loizidou & M. I. Loizides & D. L. Orthodoxou & D. Petsa, 2024. "Optimizing waste management for green shipping: industry commitment through participatory processes in Cyprus," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Ying Zheng & Jingzhu Zhao & Guofan Shao, 2020. "Port City Sustainability: A Review of Its Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Kong, Yudan & Tian, Xinyu & Sun, Jinghui & Zhou, Huan, 2025. "Charting sustainable vistas: Analysis of internal and external sustainability performance of Chinese ports," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 31-43.
    8. Marcella De Martino, 2021. "Value Creation for Sustainability in Port: Perspectives of Analysis and Future Research Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    9. J. Barona & F. Ballini & M. Canepa, 2023. "Circular developments of maritime industrial ports in Europe: a semi-systematic review of the current situation," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-35, December.
    10. Sung-Ho Shin & Oh Kyoung Kwon & Xiao Ruan & Prem Chhetri & Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Shahrooz Shahparvari, 2018. "Analyzing Sustainability Literature in Maritime Studies with Text Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Bruno Moeremans & Michaël Dooms & Elvira Haezendonck, 2023. "Long-term analysis of traffic flows in European inland ports: implications for the port–city interface," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(2), pages 272-300, June.
    12. Anni Orola & Anna Härri & Jarkko Levänen & Ville Uusitalo & Stig Irving Olsen, 2022. "Assessing WELBY Social Life Cycle Assessment Approach through Cobalt Mining Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.
    13. Yan Li & Xiaohan Zhang & Kaiyue Lin & Qingbo Huang, 2019. "The Analysis of a Simulation of a Port–City Green Cooperative Development, Based on System Dynamics: A Case Study of Shanghai Port, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Ronaldo, Reza & Suryanto, Tulus, 2022. "Green finance and sustainability development goals in Indonesian Fund Village," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    15. Laima Gerlitz & Christopher Meyer, 2021. "Small and Medium-Sized Ports in the TEN-T Network and Nexus of Europe’s Twin Transition: The Way towards Sustainable and Digital Port Service Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, April.
    16. Nadia Pintossi & Deniz Ikiz Kaya & Ana Pereira Roders, 2021. "Assessing Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse Practices: Multi-Scale Challenges and Solutions in Rijeka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    17. Aleksandra Bartosiewicz & Adam Kucharski, 2024. "Indicators of port sustainability: The example of Baltic Sea container ports," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2371-2384, June.
    18. V. Sruthy & P. K. Preetha, 2024. "Implementation and operational feasibility of an offshore floating charging station for sustainable marine transportation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 20931-20962, August.
    19. Alda-Vidal, Cecilia & Khalid, Rihab & Foulds, Chris & Royston, Sarah & Greene, Mary, 2023. "Gender imaginaries in energy transitions: How professionals construct and envision gender equity in energy access in the Global South," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    20. Di Vaio, Assunta & Varriale, Luisa & Alvino, Federico, 2018. "Key performance indicators for developing environmentally sustainable and energy efficient ports: Evidence from Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 229-240.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5394-:d:1676757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.