IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5373-d1676359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Values, Individual Judgments and Acceptance: The Case of High-Level Radioactive Waste in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Cord Drögemüller

    (Research Division, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany
    Institute of Radioecology and Radiation Protection, Leibniz University Hannover, 30419 Hannover, Germany)

  • Roman Seidl

    (Institute of Radioecology and Radiation Protection, Leibniz University Hannover, 30419 Hannover, Germany)

  • Clemens Walther

    (Institute of Radioecology and Radiation Protection, Leibniz University Hannover, 30419 Hannover, Germany)

Abstract

The sustainable final disposal of high-level radioactive waste (HLW) remains an unresolved and highly controversially discussed issue, partly because of ecological, economic, and societal challenges and partly because of the risks the public associates with such disposal. Clearly, there will be little public acceptance of the project if citizens lack trust in responsible decision-makers and the site selection procedure. This endeavor will only be accepted if trust in the ongoing procedure is strengthened. We evaluated over 1800 comments from a German study (conducted in 2020) on the issue of final HLW disposal to answer the questions of how risk perceptions, trust, and acceptance are interrelated and what role other aspects, such as social values, play. By categorizing the comments, we obtained a different picture of opinions and identified the following needs circulating among the German population: the acceptance of a HLW repository or the site selection procedure depends particularly on the extent to which individual participants perceive the values of safety and fairness as fulfilled. When do they consider a repository safe, and when do they consider the procedure fair enough? The answers to these questions seem to depend strongly on the extent to which one’s own values are considered violated. The repository’s safety and the procedure’s fairness are essential. Moreover, instead on risks, respondents commented on safety. These concerns should be taken into account in the course of the site selection procedure to enable sustainable management and disposal of HLW.

Suggested Citation

  • Cord Drögemüller & Roman Seidl & Clemens Walther, 2025. "Social Values, Individual Judgments and Acceptance: The Case of High-Level Radioactive Waste in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5373-:d:1676359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5373/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5373/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5373-:d:1676359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.