IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p5021-d1668275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Influencing Factors of Wetland Parks on the Sustainable Development of Urban Economy: A Case in Southern China

Author

Listed:
  • Shaoping Guan

    (School of Design, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)

  • Hang Huang

    (School of Design, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)

  • Zhen Liu

    (School of Design, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)

  • Chongxian Chen

    (College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

Abstract

Currently, studies in green infrastructure have developed different wetland park value evaluation systems, and various criteria to measure urban economic development have been proposed. However, these criteria are not widely adopted, and there is a lack of investigation on the relationship between wetland parks and urban economic development. The existing literature indicates that the specific impact factors of wetland parks on urban economic development have not been further explored. Therefore, this study builds on previous theoretical research to develop a conceptual model with 12 hypotheses, followed by a questionnaire survey method to obtain data. The questions have been developed for each of five variables in the conceptual model to validate the research hypotheses that have been contextually modified according to the uniqueness of different wetland parks based on previous classic scales, namely, ecological value, recreational value, resource attraction, a diversified industrial structure, and economic expectation. This study aims to investigate how wetland parks promote urban economic health through ecological value and recreational value, particularly their indirect role in fostering diversified industrial structure, resource attraction, and economic expectations. Structural equation modeling with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 26.0 and the Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS) 24.0 has been used for validating the hypotheses. The findings in this paper highlight that recreational value has the most significant impact on a diversified industrial structure that, in turn, has a highly significant positive impact on both resource attraction and economic expectations. In addition, the influence of ecological value on urban economic outcomes largely depends on recreational value as a mediator. Two significant impact pathways have been further identified: (1) from ecological value, recreational value, and a diversified industrial structure to resource attraction; and (2) from ecological value, recreational value, and a diversified industrial structure to economic expectations. Further, the managers and developers of wetland parks need to fully preserve the ecological value of the parks and optimize their recreational value before embarking on new development projects. The theoretical contribution of this paper lies in uncovering the direct and indirect effects of ecological value and recreational value on diversified industrial structure and resource attraction, emphasizing the crucial role of recreational value in driving economic diversification. The practical implications are reflected in providing concrete pathways and strategies for urban planners and policymakers to optimize the ecological and recreational value of wetland parks, thereby promoting urban economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaoping Guan & Hang Huang & Zhen Liu & Chongxian Chen, 2025. "Exploring the Influencing Factors of Wetland Parks on the Sustainable Development of Urban Economy: A Case in Southern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5021-:d:1668275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5021/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5021/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evan Mills, 2007. "Synergisms between climate change mitigation and adaptation: an insurance perspective," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 12(5), pages 809-842, June.
    2. Yaqi Du & Rong Zhao, 2022. "Research on the Development of Urban Parks Based on the Perception of Tourists: A Case Study of Taihu Park in Beijing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Aiping Wang & Weifen Lin & Bei Liu & Hui Wang & Hong Xu, 2021. "Does Smart City Construction Improve the Green Utilization Efficiency of Urban Land?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Jianwen Luo & Kaikai Zhu, 2023. "The Influential Factors on the Attraction of Outstanding Scientific and Technological Talents in Developed Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-10, April.
    5. Cynthia Rosenzweig & William Solecki & Stephen A. Hammer & Shagun Mehrotra, 2010. "Cities lead the way in climate–change action," Nature, Nature, vol. 467(7318), pages 909-911, October.
    6. Yan, Zheming & Sun, Zao & Shi, Rui & Zhao, Minjuan, 2023. "Smart city and green development: Empirical evidence from the perspective of green technological innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Merve Ersoy Mirici, 2022. "The Ecosystem Services and Green Infrastructure: A Systematic Review and the Gap of Economic Valuation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Parks P. J. & Kramer R. A., 1995. "A Policy Simulation of the Wetlands Reserve Program," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 223-240, March.
    9. Wei Li & Yingying Wang, 2024. "Producer services agglomeration and green growth: evidence from China," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1-35, June.
    10. Kevin Loughran, 2020. "Urban parks and urban problems: An historical perspective on green space development as a cultural fix," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(11), pages 2321-2338, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert N. Stavins, 1998. "A Methodological Investigation of the Costs of Carbon Sequestration," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 231-277, November.
    2. Anthony Goerzen & Christian Geisler Asmussen & Bo Bernhard Nielsen, 2024. "Global cities, the liability of foreignness, and theory on place and space in international business," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(1), pages 10-27, February.
    3. Ribaudo, Marc O. & Heimlich, Ralph & Claassen, Roger & Peters, Mark, 2001. "Least-cost management of nonpoint source pollution: source reduction versus interception strategies for controlling nitrogen loss in the Mississippi Basin," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 183-197, May.
    4. Mehryar, Sara & Sasson, Idan & Surminski, Swenja, 2022. "Supporting urban adaptation to climate change: what role can resilience measurement tools play?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113367, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Jeroen van der Heijden, 2021. "When opportunity backfires: exploring the implementation of urban climate governance alternatives in three major US cities [Are LEED-Certified Buildings Energy-Efficient in Practice?]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(1), pages 116-135.
    6. Jia, Junsheng & He, Xiaoyu & Zhu, Taiyu & Zhang, Eryu, 2023. "Does green finance reform promote corporate green innovation? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Laura Lakanen & Heli Kumpulainen & Olli Helppi & Kaisa Grönman & Risto Soukka, 2022. "Carbon Handprint Approach for Cities and Regions: A Framework to Reveal and Assess the Potential of Cities in Climate Change Mitigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Arthur Charpentier & Molly James & Hani Ali, 2021. "Predicting Drought and Subsidence Risks in France," Papers 2107.07668, arXiv.org.
    9. Shao Sun & Zunya Wang & Chuanye Hu & Ge Gao, 2021. "Understanding Climate Hazard Patterns and Urban Adaptation Measures in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Chunyu Chen & Linglan Bi & Kuanfan Zhu, 2021. "Study on Spatial-Temporal Change of Urban Green Space in Yangtze River Economic Belt and Its Driving Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Chen, Jinrui & Zhang, Yichang, 2025. "Substantive change or strategic response? Digital industrial convergence policy and urban green innovation," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(1).
    12. Bin Duan & Xuanming Ji, 2021. "Can Carbon Finance Optimize Land Use Efficiency? The Example of China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Policy," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Guglielmo Pristeri & Viviana di Martino & Silvia Ronchi & Stefano Salata & Francesca Mazza & Andrea Benedini & Andrea Arcidiacono, 2023. "An Operational Model to Downscale Regional Green Infrastructures in Supra-Local Plans: A Case Study in an Italian Alpine Sub-Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-25, July.
    14. Elena G. Irwin & Andrew M. Isserman & Maureen Kilkenny & Mark D. Partridge, 2010. "A Century of Research on Rural Development and Regional Issues," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 92(2), pages 522-553.
    15. Jinhua Liu & Xiaozhou Huang, 2024. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Drivers of High-Quality Utilization of Urban Land in Chinese Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, July.
    16. Tengfei Zhao & Jianlin Zhu & Zhiyu Jian & Xian Zhou & Puwei Zhang, 2024. "Effects of the “Urban Double Repairs” Policy on Urban Land-Use Carbon Emission Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-24, November.
    17. Guoqing Cui & Wenlong Zheng & Siliang Chen & Yue Dong & Tingyu Huang, 2022. "Study on the Spatial Pattern Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Inefficient Urban Land Use in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    18. Michaela Korená Hillayová & Klára Báliková & Blanka Giertliová & Josef Drábek & Ján Holécy, 2021. "Possibilities of forest property insurance against the risk of fire in Slovakia," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(5), pages 204-211.
    19. Hao Su & Shuo Yang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Urban Land Green Use Efficiency under Carbon Emission Constraints in the Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-28, October.
    20. Daniel G. Costa & João Carlos N. Bittencourt & Franklin Oliveira & João Paulo Just Peixoto & Thiago C. Jesus, 2024. "Achieving Sustainable Smart Cities through Geospatial Data-Driven Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-30, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5021-:d:1668275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.