IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p4871-d1664600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Participation in the Development of Sustainable, Environmentally Conscious Villages in the Cirasea Sub-Watershed, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Nur Syamsiyah

    (Department of Socio Economic Agricultural, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Agriani Hermita Sadeli

    (Department of Socio Economic Agricultural, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Zumi Saidah

    (Department of Socio Economic Agricultural, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Trisna Insan Noor

    (Department of Socio Economic Agricultural, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Sri Widiyanesti

    (School of Economics and Business, Telkom University, Jl. Telekomunikasi No. 1 Ters. Buah Batu, Bandung 40257, Indonesia)

Abstract

The establishment of green villages has been a key initiative of the Citarum Harum program since 2015 in order to address pollution in the Citarum watershed, particularly in the Cirasea sub-watershed. This program’s success depends largely on community involvement in planning and implementation. Thie aim of this study was to identify the extent of community participation in developing environmentally conscious hamlets in Cirasea. Using a mixed-methods approach—quantitative surveys followed by qualitative interviews and observations—data were collected from 10 villages. The findings show varying participation levels, influenced by socioeconomic conditions, program characteristics, environmental issues, and institutional support. Community involvement was assessed across the planning, implementation, benefit-taking, and evaluation stages. Participation was very extensive in decision-making and implementation, as well as in evaluation, but it was less satisfactory in benefit-taking. This research underscores the critical role of inclusive community engagement in ensuring the success and sustainability of environmental development programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Nur Syamsiyah & Agriani Hermita Sadeli & Zumi Saidah & Trisna Insan Noor & Sri Widiyanesti, 2025. "Community Participation in the Development of Sustainable, Environmentally Conscious Villages in the Cirasea Sub-Watershed, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-25, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4871-:d:1664600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4871/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4871/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghazala Mansuri & Vijayendra Rao, 2013. "Localizing Development : Does Participation Work?," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 11859, April.
    2. Michael Gusenbauer, 2019. "Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(1), pages 177-214, January.
    3. Nur Syamsiyah & Lies Sulistyowati & Trisna Insan Noor & Iwan Setiawan, 2023. "The Sustainability Level of an EcoVillage in the Upper Citarum Watershed of West Java Province, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-25, November.
    4. Pretty, Jules N., 1995. "Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(8), pages 1247-1263, August.
    5. Thomas Tufte & Paolo Mefalopulos, 2009. "Participatory Communication : A Practical Guide," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 5940, April.
    6. Nur Syamsiyah & Sara Ratna Qanti & Dini Rochdiani, 2024. "Risk Mitigation in Environmental Conservation for Potato Production in Cisangkuy Sub-Watershed, Bandung Regency, West Java, Indonesia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Cohen, John M. & Uphoff, Norman T., 1980. "Participation's place in rural development: Seeking clarity through specificity," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 213-235, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Handberg, Øyvind Nystad, 2018. "No sense of ownership in weak participation: a forest conservation experiment in Tanzania," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(4), pages 434-451, August.
    2. Mbeche, Robert & Ateka, Josiah & Herrmann, Raoul & Grote, Ulrike, 2021. "Understanding forest users' participation in participatory forest management (PFM): Insights from Mt. Elgon forest ecosystem, Kenya," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    3. Cornwall, Andrea, 2003. "Whose Voices? Whose Choices? Reflections on Gender and Participatory Development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1325-1342, August.
    4. Jalaluddin Abdul Malek & Seng Boon Lim & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Social Inclusion Indicators for Building Citizen-Centric Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, January.
    5. Elena Pagliarino & Secondo Rolfo, 2021. "Examining Researchers’ Attitudes, Barriers, and Opportunities for Participatory Research: The Case of the Riso-Biosystems Project on Organic Rice," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Allan Kasapa & Charles Gyan, 2023. "Community Participation in Planning Social Infrastructure Delivery in Ghana’s Local Government: A Case Study of Shai Osudoku District," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 8(2), pages 264-285, July.
    7. Malin Hasselskog, 2020. "What happens to local participation when national ownership gets stronger? Initiating an exploration in Rwanda and Cambodia," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(S1), pages 91-111, May.
    8. Ho, Serene & Choudhury, Pranab R. & Joshi, Richa, 2023. "Community participation for inclusive land administration: A case study of the Odisha urban slum formalization project," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    9. Michener, Victoria J., 1998. "The participatory approach: Contradiction and co-option in Burkina Faso," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 26(12), pages 2105-2118, December.
    10. Vijayakumar, Gowri, 2018. "Collective demands and secret codes: The multiple uses of “community” in “community mobilization”," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 173-182.
    11. Sonja Kaufmann & Nikolaus Hruschka & Christian R. Vogl, 2020. "Bridging the Literature Gap: A Framework for Assessing Actor Participation in Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-26, October.
    12. Pilar Useche, 2016. "Who Contributes to the Provision of Public Goods at the Community Level? The Case of Potable Water in Ghana," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 34(6), pages 869-888, November.
    13. World Bank Group, 2015. "Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan School Autonomy and Accountability," World Bank Publications - Reports 26536, The World Bank Group.
    14. Corrine Cash, 2021. "Creating the Conditions for Climate Resilience: A Community-Based Approach in Canumay East, Philippines," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 298-308.
    15. Katherine Casey & Rachel Glennerster & Edward Miguel & Maarten Voors, 2023. "Skill Versus Voice in Local Development," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 105(2), pages 311-326, March.
    16. Konstantinos Matakos & Dimitrios Minos & Ari Perdana & Elizabeth Radin, 2022. "“Dragon boating” alone? Community ties and systemic income shocks," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 55-81, January.
    17. Kazadi, Kande & Lievens, Annouk & Mahr, Dominik, 2016. "Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 525-540.
    18. Fazekas,Mihály & Blum,Jurgen Rene, 2021. "Improving Public Procurement Outcomes : Review of Tools and the State of the Evidence Base," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9690, The World Bank.
    19. Bet Caeyers, 2014. "Peer effects in development programme awareness of vulnerable groups in rural Tanzania," CSAE Working Paper Series 2014-11, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
    20. Martin, Will, 2021. "Tools for measuring the full impacts of agricultural interventions," IFPRI-MCC technical papers 2, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4871-:d:1664600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.