IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p15951-d1280426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Sustainability Level of an EcoVillage in the Upper Citarum Watershed of West Java Province, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Nur Syamsiyah

    (Department of Social Economic Agricultural, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Lies Sulistyowati

    (Department of Social Economic Agricultural, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Trisna Insan Noor

    (Department of Social Economic Agricultural, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Iwan Setiawan

    (Department of Social Economic Agricultural, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

Abstract

The Citarum watershed is the longest in West Java Province. It is used as a source of raw water for drinking water, irrigation water for hundreds of thousands of hectares of rice fields, fisheries, industrial raw water, and hydroelectric power plants. The high population and industry growth at the outskirts of the Citarum watershed, which is not accompanied by good waste management, also results in high pollution in the Citarum watershed. Various efforts to handle the issue have been carried out since 1989 until the present; however, this problem still needs to be solved. One of the approaches to overcome environmental pollution that has been conducted is to develop an environmentally-cultured village. This study aims to determine the sustainability level of environmentally-cultured villages in the Upper Citarum watershed viewed from ecological, economic, social, and cultural dimensions using a multidimensional scaling (MDS) approach with the Rapid Appraisal Technique for Ecovillage (RAPVIL) software (version 1.0). The result shows that the multidimensional sustainability of ecovillage development in the Upper Citarum watershed, West Java Province is “fairly sustainable” for the cultural dimension and “poorly sustainable” for the ecological, social, and economic dimensions. This result shows that ecovillage development still requires support from various stakeholders to improve its sustainability status. The cultural dimension has the highest value due to the local cultural values, including a value system, traditions, languages, norms, and customs that have grown in the community. Meanwhile, the social dimension has the lowest sustainability value, influenced by the low level of community participation in ecovillage development.

Suggested Citation

  • Nur Syamsiyah & Lies Sulistyowati & Trisna Insan Noor & Iwan Setiawan, 2023. "The Sustainability Level of an EcoVillage in the Upper Citarum Watershed of West Java Province, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15951-:d:1280426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15951/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15951/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mulder, Kenneth & Costanza, Robert & Erickson, Jon, 2006. "The contribution of built, human, social and natural capital to quality of life in intentional and unintentional communities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 13-23, August.
    2. Michael Gusenbauer, 2019. "Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(1), pages 177-214, January.
    3. Lenore Newman & Denver Nixon, 2014. "Farming in an Agriburban Ecovillage Development," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, December.
    4. Louise Meijering & Paulus Huigen & Bettina Van Hoven, 2007. "Intentional Communities In Rural Spaces," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 98(1), pages 42-52, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Osman Zeybek & Elmas Erdoğan, 2025. "Transforming Traditional Villages into Sustainable Communities: Evaluating Ecovillage Potential in Bursa, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Nur Syamsiyah & Agriani Hermita Sadeli & Zumi Saidah & Trisna Insan Noor & Sri Widiyanesti, 2025. "Community Participation in the Development of Sustainable, Environmentally Conscious Villages in the Cirasea Sub-Watershed, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-25, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Norma Salgado-Orellana & Emilio Berrocal de-Luna & Calixto Gutiérrez-Braojos, 2021. "A scientometric study of doctoral theses on the Roma in the Iberian Peninsula during the 1977–2018 period," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 437-458, January.
    2. Kofi A. A-O. Agyei-Henaku & Charlotte Badu-Prah & Francis Srofenyoh & Ferguson K. Gidiglo & Akua Agyeiwaa-Afrane & Justice G. Djokoto, 2024. "Citations of Publications on Foreign Direct Investments into Agribusiness: Nature, Variability and Drivers," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, February.
    3. Simone Belli & Carlos Gonzalo-Penela, 2020. "Science, research, and innovation infospheres in Google results of the Ibero-American countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(2), pages 635-653, May.
    4. Ibrahim Ahmed Ghashim & Muhammad Arshad, 2023. "Internet of Things (IoT)-Based Teaching and Learning: Modern Trends and Open Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Katia A. Figueroa-Rodríguez & Francisco Hernández-Rosas & Benjamín Figueroa-Sandoval & Joel Velasco-Velasco & Noé Aguilar Rivera, 2019. "What Has Been the Focus of Sugarcane Research? A Bibliometric Overview," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Hanna Obracht-Prondzyńska & Ewa Duda & Helena Anacka & Jolanta Kowal, 2022. "Greencoin as an AI-Based Solution Shaping Climate Awareness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-25, September.
    7. Lim, Weng Marc & Rasul, Tareq, 2022. "Customer engagement and social media: Revisiting the past to inform the future," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 325-342.
    8. Merrill Baker-Médard & Katherine Concannon & Courtney Gantt & Sierra Moen & Easton R. White, 2024. "Socialscape Ecology: Integrating Social Features and Processes into Spatially Explicit Marine Conservation Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Isaac Akomea-Frimpong & Amma Kyewaa Agyekum & Alexander Baah Amoakwa & Prosper Babon-Ayeng & Fatemeh Pariafsai, 2024. "Toward the attainment of climate-smart PPP infrastructure projects: a critical review and recommendations," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 19195-19229, August.
    10. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Pereira, Vijay & Islam, Nazrul & Giudice, Manlio Del & Choudrie, Jyoti, 2022. "Gamification and e-learning for young learners: A systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    11. Jussi T. S. Heikkila, 2022. "Journal of Economic Literature codes classification system (JEL)," Papers 2207.06076, arXiv.org.
    12. Daniel Thompson & Gianluca Pescaroli, 2024. "Financing electricity resilience in local communities: a review of the literature," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 740-762, September.
    13. Danias, Nikolaos & Koukopoulos, Anastasios, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence and Regulation: Total Quality Management for Mental Health Services," MPRA Paper 123475, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2025.
    14. Sulistyodewi Nur Wiyono & Yosini Deliana & Eliana Wulandari & Nitty Hirawaty Kamarulzaman, 2022. "The Embodiment of Muslim Intention Elements in Buying Halal Food Products: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    15. Lenore Newman & Denver Nixon, 2014. "Farming in an Agriburban Ecovillage Development," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, December.
    16. Edson Tandoc & Bruno Takahashi, 2013. "The Complex Road to Happiness: The Influence of Human Development, a Healthy Environment and a Free Press," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(1), pages 537-550, August.
    17. Aman Kumar & Binil Starly, 2022. "“FabNER”: information extraction from manufacturing process science domain literature using named entity recognition," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(8), pages 2393-2407, December.
    18. Vivek Kumar Singh & Satya Swarup Srichandan & Hiran H. Lathabai, 2022. "ResearchGate and Google Scholar: how much do they differ in publications, citations and different metrics and why?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(3), pages 1515-1542, March.
    19. Marian R. Chertow & Koichi S. Kanaoka & Jooyoung Park, 2021. "Tracking the diffusion of industrial symbiosis scholarship using bibliometrics: Comparing across Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(4), pages 913-931, August.
    20. Ruben Tessmann & Ralf Elbert, 2022. "Multi-sided platforms in competitive B2B networks with varying governmental influence – a taxonomy of Port and Cargo Community System business models," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 829-872, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15951-:d:1280426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.