IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p4855-d1664256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Impact of Board Size on ESG Controversies: New Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Jian Yin

    (School of Economics and Management, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China)

  • Jian Xu

    (School of Economics and Management, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China)

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the impact of board size on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) controversies using data from Chinese-listed companies during 2007–2022. In addition, we explore the moderating effects of female participation on corporate boards, board age, financing constraints, and internal control. ESG controversies are measured by an ESG controversies score from the LSEG Workspace, and fixed effects models are used to perform the analysis. The results show that larger boards can lead to more ESG controversies in China. This impact is greater in non-manufacturing, heavily polluted, and non-high-tech industries, in state-owned enterprises, eastern regions, and non-foreign-funded companies. Additionally, women on boards and internal control weaken the impact of board size on ESG controversies, while financing constraints strengthen this impact. The moderating effect of board age is not significant. The findings can help Chinese-listed companies improve their ESG performance and achieve sustainable development through strengthening corporate governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Jian Yin & Jian Xu, 2025. "Exploring the Impact of Board Size on ESG Controversies: New Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4855-:d:1664256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4855/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4855/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4855-:d:1664256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.