IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4515-d1656637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Value Relationships of Stakeholders in Urban Land Redevelopment: A Study Based on Stakeholder Value Network and Adversarial Interpretive Structure Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Siling Yang

    (College of City Construction, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China
    School of Economics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Hao Chen

    (College of City Construction, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China)

  • Puwei Zhang

    (College of City Construction, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China)

  • Tengfei Zhao

    (College of City Construction, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China)

  • Yang Zhang

    (College of City Construction, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China)

Abstract

Urbanization in China has led to scarce urban land resources, rendering urban land redevelopment (ULR) crucial for achieving efficient and sustainable land allocation. ULR involves complex value exchanges among multiple stakeholders. Previous research has primarily concentrated on direct stakeholder linkages, with few studies employing network methodologies to comprehensively depict the value relationships among stakeholders. In this study, we utilize the Stakeholder Value Network (SVN) to construct a model consisting of 8 stakeholder categories and 92 value flows; furthermore, we integrate the Adversarial Interpretive Structure Modeling (AISM) to elucidate the hierarchical relationships among key value flows, thereby exploring the process of value co-creation in ULR. The results show: (1) Capital value flows dominate among the five types of value flow, while the potential contributions of the other value flows remain underexplored. (2) Developers are central to the value network, with government departments, original land users, and builders playing key roles, whereas other stakeholders show lower engagement. (3) Key value flows can be categorized into superficial, transitional, and essential layers, with essential value flows exerting a decisive impact on the network. Our findings enhance the understanding of stakeholder value needs and offer a novel perspective for formulating and implementing ULR strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Siling Yang & Hao Chen & Puwei Zhang & Tengfei Zhao & Yang Zhang, 2025. "Evaluating the Value Relationships of Stakeholders in Urban Land Redevelopment: A Study Based on Stakeholder Value Network and Adversarial Interpretive Structure Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4515-:d:1656637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4515/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4515/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wendong Wu & Fang He & Taozhi Zhuang & Yuan Yi, 2020. "Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in the Decision-Making of Industrial Land Redevelopment in China: The Case of Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Jiang, Yanpeng & Mohabir, Nalini & Ma, Renfeng & Wu, Lichao & Chen, Mingxing, 2020. "Whose village? Stakeholder interests in the urban renewal of Hubei old village in Shenzhen," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Zhang, Wei & Zhang, Xinxin & Wu, Guangdong, 2021. "The network governance of urban renewal: A comparative analysis of two cities in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    4. Thomas Schneider & Sybille Sachs, 2017. "The Impact of Stakeholder Identities on Value Creation in Issue-Based Stakeholder Networks," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 41-57, August.
    5. Yang, Yong & Li, Qiaoxing & Li, Chengjiang & Qin, Quande, 2024. "User requirements analysis of new energy vehicles based on improved Kano model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    6. Li, Yu & Zhu, Penglin & Mlecnik, Erwin & Qian, Queena K. & Visscher, Henk J., 2024. "Dissemination, manipulation or monopolization? Understanding the influence of stakeholder information sharing on resident participation in neighborhood rehabilitation of urban China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    7. Kim, Su-Ah & Park, Sohyun & Kwak, Minjung & Kang, Changmuk, 2025. "Examining product quality and competitiveness via online reviews: An integrated approach of importance performance competitor analysis and Kano model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    8. Yiming Wang & Pengcheng Xiang, 2019. "Investigate the Conduction Path of Stakeholder Conflict of Urban Regeneration Sustainability in China: the Application of Social-Based Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Lingyan Li & Jiaxin Zhu & Mimi Duan & Pingbo Li & Xiaotong Guo, 2022. "Overcoming the Collaboration Barriers among Stakeholders in Urban Renewal Based on a Two-Mode Social Network Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Duane Windsor, 2010. "The Role of Dynamics in Stakeholder Thinking," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 79-87, August.
    11. Pereira, Brenda Medeiros & Santos Senna, Luiz Afonso dos & Lindau, Luis Antonio, 2018. "Stakeholder Value Network: Modeling key relationships for advancing towards high quality bus transit systems," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 386-393.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lingyan Li & Jiaxin Zhu & Mimi Duan & Pingbo Li & Xiaotong Guo, 2022. "Overcoming the Collaboration Barriers among Stakeholders in Urban Renewal Based on a Two-Mode Social Network Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Silvana Signori & Yves Fassin, 2023. "Family Members’ Salience in Family Business: An Identity-Based Stakeholder Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(1), pages 191-211, February.
    3. Xiaoru Zheng & Chunling Sun & Jingjing Liu, 2024. "Exploring stakeholder engagement in urban village renovation projects through a mixed-method approach to social network analysis: a case study of Tianjin," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Shahzad Khurram & Sandra Charreire Petit, 2017. "Investigating the Dynamics of Stakeholder Salience: What Happens When the Institutional Change Process Unfolds?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 485-515, July.
    5. Jianglin Lu & Keqiang Wang & Hongmei Liu, 2022. "Residents’ Selection Behavior of Compensation Schemes for Construction Land Reduction: Empirical Evidence from Questionnaires in Shanghai, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, December.
    6. Ruben Burga & Davar Rezania, 2016. "Stakeholder theory in social entrepreneurship: a descriptive case study," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Hao Liu & Ying Chen & Lin Ma, 2023. "Is Urban Renewal with Campaign-Style Governance Characteristics Satisfying in China?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 170(2), pages 561-579, November.
    8. Jinkun Yang & Linchuan Yang & Haitao Ma, 2022. "Community Participation Strategy for Sustainable Urban Regeneration in Xiamen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Wafaa El GOUZ & Azzeddine ALLIOUI, 2024. "The Socioeconomic Value Creation in Morocco through the Organization of the 2030 World Cup: An Exploration of its Impact on the Financial Performance of Moroccan Businesses," RAIS Journal for Social Sciences, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 8(2), pages 12-22, November.
    10. Nathalie Gröfke & Valérie Duplat & Christopher Wickert & Brian Tjemkes, 2021. "A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Food Labelling for Environmental Sustainability: Attitudes, Perceived Barriers, and Solution Approaches towards the “Traffic Light Index”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    11. Shen, Liyin & Liu, Yan & Ren, Yitian & Wong, Siu Wai, 2024. "A methodological framework for analysing the justice phenomenon embedded in urban regeneration: A Chinese perspective based at the project level," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    12. Yanpeng Gao & Wenjun Chen, 2021. "Study on the coupling relationship between urban resilience and urbanization quality—A case study of 14 cities of Liaoning Province in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, January.
    13. Han, Ze & Deng, Xiangzheng & Li, Zhihui & Huang, Xiankai, 2024. "Mechanism and simulation of intensive use of urban inefficient land based on evolutionary game theory," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    14. Yijing Chu & Yingying Wang & Zucheng Zhang & Shengli Dai, 2022. "Decoupling of Economic Growth and Industrial Water Use in Hubei Province: From an Ecological–Economic Interaction Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    15. Cruz-Daraviña, Paola Andrea & Bocarejo Suescún, Juan Pablo, 2021. "Freight operations in city centers: A land use conflict in urban planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    16. Zhang, Wei & Li, Yuqing & Zheng, Caigui, 2023. "The distribution characteristics and driving mechanism of vacant land in Chengdu, China: A perspective of urban shrinkage and expansion," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    17. Won, Jisoo & Son, Jiyeong & Kwak, Minjung, 2025. "Review lifecycle analytics and importance–obsolescence analysis: A data-driven design approach to product circularity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    18. Nina Danilina & Anna Korobeinikova & Irina Teplova, 2024. "Decision-Making Approach for Land Use in Urban Industrial Area Redevelopment Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-33, November.
    19. Zhang, Jiayu & Yang, Xiaodong & Wang, Hao, 2021. "Age-friendly regeneration of urban settlements in China: Game and incentives of stakeholders in decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    20. de Andres, Pablo & Garcia-Rodriguez, Inigo & Romero-Merino, M. Elena & Santamaria-Mariscal, Marcos, 2022. "Stakeholder governance and private benefits: The case of politicians in Spanish cajas," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1272-1292.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4515-:d:1656637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.