IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i19p5271-d270614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigate the Conduction Path of Stakeholder Conflict of Urban Regeneration Sustainability in China: the Application of Social-Based Solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Yiming Wang

    (School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Pengcheng Xiang

    (School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
    International Research Center for Sustainable Built Environment, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

Abstract

Urban regeneration, as an important way to enhance urban sustainable development capacity, is advancing at a high speed in China. However, urban regeneration involves various stakeholders, and there are frequent conflicts between these stakeholders due to the vast differences in their interests. When conflicts among stakeholders are not effectively controlled, they can have serious negative social and economic impacts, such as increased pressure on the government to maintain stability, increased costs to developers and reduced willingness of property owners to participate. These are all critical factor affecting the sustainability of urban regeneration. Therefore, this paper explored the mechanism underlying stakeholder conflict conduction in urban regeneration. Next, a literature review and case study were conducted to identify key conflict factors. Then, the factors of stakeholder conflict were assessed using questionnaire survey. Finally, the structural equation model (SEM) was used to analyze the pathways of stakeholder conflict conduction in urban regeneration; and 35 conflict conduction paths were found. Based on Pareto’s Law, 7 of the 35 stakeholder conflict paths were identified as critical paths with coefficients between 0.245–0.364. Empirical results revealed that different types of conflict factors have different impacts on stakeholder conflict conduction, among which interest distribution and stakeholder coordination were the critical factors to be considered. The findings provide alternatives Social-Based Solutions (SBS) for resolving stakeholder conflicts and provide practical guidance for integrating stakeholders, which is important to ensuring the sustainability of urban regeneration.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiming Wang & Pengcheng Xiang, 2019. "Investigate the Conduction Path of Stakeholder Conflict of Urban Regeneration Sustainability in China: the Application of Social-Based Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5271-:d:270614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5271/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5271/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corina M. Rădulescu & Ovidiu Ştefan & Gheorghe M.T. Rădulescu & Adrian T.G.M. Rădulescu & Mihai V.G.M. Rădulescu, 2016. "Management of Stakeholders in Urban Regeneration Projects. Case Study: Baia-Mare, Transylvania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Peter Campbell & Tamsin Cox & Dave O’Brien, 2017. "The social life of measurement: how methods have shaped the idea of culture in urban regeneration," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 49-62, January.
    3. Liu, Yilun & Zhu, A-Xing & Wang, Jingli & Li, Wenkai & Hu, Guohua & Hu, Yueming, 2019. "Land-use decision support in brownfield redevelopment for urban renewal based on crowdsourced data and a presence-and-background learning (PBL) method," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    4. Elena Tavella & Isabella Lami, 2019. "Negotiating perspectives and values through soft OR in the context of urban renewal," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(1), pages 136-161, January.
    5. Kexi Xu & Geoffrey Qiping Shen & Guiwen Liu & Igor Martek, 2019. "Demolition of Existing Buildings in Urban Renewal Projects: A Decision Support System in the China Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, January.
    6. Simon Guy & John Henneberry & Steven Rowley, 2002. "Development Cultures and Urban Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(7), pages 1181-1196, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francesco Tajani & Pierluigi Morano & Felicia Di Liddo & Ivana La Spina, 2025. "An evaluation methodological approach to support the definition of effective urban projects: A case study in the city of Rome (Italy)," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 771-793, February.
    2. Chahardowli, Mehrdad & Sajadzadeh, Hassan, 2022. "A strategic development model for regeneration of urban historical cores: A case study of the historical fabric of Hamedan City," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    3. Zhang, Jiayu & Yang, Xiaodong & Wang, Hao, 2021. "Age-friendly regeneration of urban settlements in China: Game and incentives of stakeholders in decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    4. Shen, Tiyan & Yao, Xinyi & Wen, Fenghua, 2021. "The Urban Regeneration Engine Model: An analytical framework and case study of the renewal of old communities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    5. Benedetto Manganelli & Sabina Tataranna & Marco Vona & Francesco Paolo Del Giudice, 2022. "An Innovative Approach for the Enhancement of Public Real Estate Assets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Yuqi Zhang & Sungik Kang & Ja-Hoon Koo, 2021. "Perception Difference and Conflicts of Stakeholders in the Urban Regeneration Project: A Case Study of Nanluoguxiang," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Manganelli, Benedetto & Tataranna, Sabina & Pontrandolfi, Piergiuseppe, 2020. "A model to support the decision-making in urban regeneration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Siling Yang & Hao Chen & Puwei Zhang & Tengfei Zhao & Yang Zhang, 2025. "Evaluating the Value Relationships of Stakeholders in Urban Land Redevelopment: A Study Based on Stakeholder Value Network and Adversarial Interpretive Structure Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Li Wang & Pan Ren & Yongwei Shan & Guanqiao Zhang, 2025. "Subsidy Ceilings and Sequential Synergy: Steering Sustainable Outcomes Through Dynamic Thresholds in China’s Urban Renewal Tripartite Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-32, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minh Van Nguyen & Tu Thanh Nguyen & Chien Thanh Phan & Khanh Duy Ha, 2024. "Sustainable redevelopment of urban areas: Assessment of key barriers for the reconstruction of old residential buildings," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2282-2297, June.
    2. Shiyao Zhu & Dezhi Li & Haibo Feng & Tiantian Gu & Jiawei Zhu, 2019. "AHP-TOPSIS-Based Evaluation of the Relative Performance of Multiple Neighborhood Renewal Projects: A Case Study in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-17, August.
    3. John Henneberry & Claire Roberts, 2008. "Calculated Inequality? Portfolio Benchmarking and Regional Office Property Investment in the UK," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(5-6), pages 1217-1241, May.
    4. Thierry Theurillat & Jose Corpataux & Olivier Crevoisier, 2008. "Property Sector Financialization: The Case of Swiss Pension Funds (1992--2005)," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 189-212, December.
    5. Nici Zimmermann & Katherine Curran, 2023. "Dynamics of interdisciplinarity: a microlevel analysis of communication and facilitation in a group model‐building workshop," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 39(4), pages 336-370, October.
    6. Yi-De Liu, 2019. "Event and Sustainable Culture-Led Regeneration: Lessons from the 2008 European Capital of Culture, Liverpool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Zhang, Jiayu & Yang, Xiaodong & Wang, Hao, 2021. "Age-friendly regeneration of urban settlements in China: Game and incentives of stakeholders in decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    8. Rafał Blazy & Rita Łabuz, 2022. "Spatial Distribution and Land Development Parameters of Shopping Centers Based on GIS Analysis: A Case Study on Kraków, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, June.
    9. Siân Butcher, 2020. "Appropriating rent from greenfield affordable housing: developer practices in Johannesburg," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(2), pages 337-361, March.
    10. Lei Qi & Yong Adilah Shamsul Harumain & Melasutra Md Dali, 2025. "Enhancing Sustainability: A Systematic Review of the Livable Neighborhood Life Circle and Its Prospects in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-25, October.
    11. Isabella M. Lami & Beatrice Mecca, 2020. "Assessing Social Sustainability for Achieving Sustainable Architecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Yan Yu & Qiqi Yan & Yu Guo & Chenhe Zhang & Zhixiang Huang & Liangze Lin, 2025. "AI-Based Identification and Redevelopment Prioritization of Inefficient Industrial Land Using Street View Imagery and Multi-Criteria Modeling," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Chahardowli, Mehrdad & Sajadzadeh, Hassan, 2022. "A strategic development model for regeneration of urban historical cores: A case study of the historical fabric of Hamedan City," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    14. Junpai Chen & Yue Chen & Yitong Zhu & Mingyan Xiao & Hongfei Yang & Huaming Huang & Linli Li, 2023. "Assessing the Sustainability of Urban Community Renewal Projects in Southern China Based on a Hybrid MADM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-33, February.
    15. Thierry Theurillat, 2011. "La ville négociée : entre financiarisation et durabilité," Géographie, économie, société, Lavoisier, vol. 13(3), pages 225-254.
    16. Marija Burinskienė & Vytautas Bielinskas & Askoldas Podviezko & Virginija Gurskienė & Vida Maliene, 2017. "Evaluating the Significance of Criteria Contributing to Decision-Making on Brownfield Land Redevelopment Strategies in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Tao Zhou & Yulin Zhou & Guiwen Liu, 2017. "Key Variables for Decision-Making on Urban Renewal in China: A Case Study of Chongqing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Thierry Theurillat & Olivier Crevoisier, 2013. "The Sustainability of a Financialized Urban Megaproject: The Case of Sihlcity in Zurich," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 2052-2073, November.
    19. Kim, Daehwan & Seo, Ducksu & Kwon, Youngsang, 2021. "Novel trends in SNS customers in food and beverage patronage: An empirical study of metropolitan cities in South Korea," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    20. Guiwen Liu & Zhiyong Yi & Xiaoling Zhang & Asheem Shrestha & Igor Martek & Lizhen Wei, 2017. "An Evaluation of Urban Renewal Policies of Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5271-:d:270614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.