IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4432-d1654886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contrastive Learning-Based Cross-Modal Fusion for Product Form Imagery Recognition: A Case Study on New Energy Vehicle Front-End Design

Author

Listed:
  • Yutong Zhang

    (School of Arts and Design, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, China)

  • Jiantao Wu

    (School of Arts and Design, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, China)

  • Li Sun

    (School of Arts and Design, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, China
    Coastal Area Port Industry Development Collaborative Innovation Center, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, China)

  • Guoan Yang

    (School of Arts and Design, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, China)

Abstract

Fine-grained feature extraction and affective semantic mapping remain significant challenges in product form analysis. To address these issues, this study proposes a contrastive learning-based cross-modal fusion approach for product form imagery recognition, using the front-end design of new energy vehicles (NEVs) as a case study. The proposed method first employs the Biterm Topic Model (BTM) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to extract thematic patterns and compute weight distributions from consumer review texts, thereby identifying key imagery style labels. These labels are then leveraged for image annotation, facilitating the construction of a multimodal dataset. Next, ResNet-50 and Transformer architectures serve as the image and text encoders, respectively, to extract and represent multimodal features. To ensure effective alignment and deep fusion of textual and visual representations in a shared embedding space, a contrastive learning mechanism is introduced, optimizing cosine similarity between positive and negative sample pairs. Finally, a fully connected multilayer network is integrated at the output of the Transformer and ResNet with Contrastive Learning (TRCL) model to enhance classification accuracy and reliability. Comparative experiments against various deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) demonstrate that the TRCL model effectively integrates semantic and visual information, significantly improving the accuracy and robustness of complex product form imagery recognition. These findings suggest that the proposed method holds substantial potential for large-scale product appearance evaluation and affective cognition research. Moreover, this data-driven fusion underpins sustainable product form design by streamlining evaluation and optimizing resource use.

Suggested Citation

  • Yutong Zhang & Jiantao Wu & Li Sun & Guoan Yang, 2025. "Contrastive Learning-Based Cross-Modal Fusion for Product Form Imagery Recognition: A Case Study on New Energy Vehicle Front-End Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-28, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4432-:d:1654886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4432/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4432/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huan Lin & Xiaolei Deng & Jianping Yu & Xiaoliang Jiang & Dongsong Zhang, 2023. "A Study of Sustainable Product Design Evaluation Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Deep Residual Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Ghiassaleh, Arezou & Kocher, Bruno & Czellar, Sandor, 2024. "The effects of benefit-based (vs. attribute-based) product categorizations on mental imagery and purchase behavior," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 239-255.
    3. Vaidya, Omkarprasad S. & Kumar, Sushil, 2006. "Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 1-29, February.
    4. Yuanjian Du & Xiaoxue Liu & Mobing Cai & Kyungjin Park, 2024. "A Product’s Kansei Appearance Design Method Based on Conditional-Controlled AI Image Generation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-28, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jochen Wulf, 2020. "Development of an AHP hierarchy for managing omnichannel capabilities: a design science research approach," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 39-68, April.
    2. Nina Almasifar & Tülay Özdemir Canbolat & Milad Akhavan & Roberto Alonso González-Lezcano, 2021. "Proposing a New Methodology for Monument Conservation “SCOPE MANAGEMENT” by the Use of an Analytic Hierarchy Process Project Management Institute System and the ICOMOS Burra Charter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Jitendar Kumar Khatri & Bhimaraya Metri, 2016. "SWOT-AHP Approach for Sustainable Manufacturing Strategy Selection: A Case of Indian SME," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(5), pages 1211-1226, October.
    4. Sushil, 2019. "Efficient interpretive ranking process incorporating implicit and transitive dominance relationships," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1489-1516, December.
    5. Wang, Ying-Ming & Elhag, Taha M.S., 2007. "A goal programming method for obtaining interval weights from an interval comparison matrix," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 458-471, February.
    6. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    7. Lim, Chulmin & Rowsell, Joe & Kim, Seongcheol, 2023. "Exploring the killer domains to create new value: A Comparative case study of Canadian and Korean telcos," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 277998, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    8. Ho, William, 2008. "Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 211-228, April.
    9. Chao Liu & Qichen Liao & Wenyan Gao & Shuxian Li & Peng Jiang & Ding Li, 2024. "Intellectual Capital Evaluation Index Based on a Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Technique," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-29, April.
    10. Wenshuai Wu & Gang Kou, 2016. "A group consensus model for evaluating real estate investment alternatives," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Che, Siyu & Jin, Xiaotong & Sheng, Guanghua & Lin, Zhengnan, 2025. "Seeking effective fit: The impact of brand-influencer fit types on consumer brand attitude," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    12. Karasakal, Esra & Aker, Pınar, 2017. "A multicriteria sorting approach based on data envelopment analysis for R&D project selection problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 79-92.
    13. Lucie Lidinska & Josef Jablonsky, 2018. "AHP model for performance evaluation of employees in a Czech management consulting company," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(1), pages 239-258, March.
    14. Bashar Hassna & Sarah Namany & Mohammad Alherbawi & Adel Elomri & Tareq Al-Ansari, 2024. "Multi-Objective Optimization for Food Availability under Economic and Environmental Risk Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Rubio-Aliaga, Alvaro & García-Cascales, M. Socorro & Sánchez-Lozano, Juan Miguel & Molina-Garcia, Angel, 2021. "MCDM-based multidimensional approach for selection of optimal groundwater pumping systems: Design and case example," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 213-224.
    16. Saeed Nosratabadi & Gergo Pinter & Amir Mosavi & Sandor Semperger, 2020. "Sustainable Banking; Evaluation of the European Business Models," Papers 2003.13423, arXiv.org.
    17. Zhu, Bin & Xu, Zeshui, 2014. "Stochastic preference analysis in numerical preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 628-633.
    18. Wang, Ying-Ming & Luo, Ying & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2008. "On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 735-747, April.
    19. Jing Xu & Ren Zhang & Yangjun Wang & Hengqian Yan & Quanhong Liu & Yutong Guo & Yongcun Ren, 2022. "A New Framework for Assessment of Offshore Wind Farm Location," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    20. M Tavana & M A Sodenkamp, 2010. "A fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis model for advanced technology assessment at Kennedy Space Center," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(10), pages 1459-1470, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4432-:d:1654886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.