IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4432-d1654886.html

Contrastive Learning-Based Cross-Modal Fusion for Product Form Imagery Recognition: A Case Study on New Energy Vehicle Front-End Design

Author

Listed:
  • Yutong Zhang

    (School of Arts and Design, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, China)

  • Jiantao Wu

    (School of Arts and Design, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, China)

  • Li Sun

    (School of Arts and Design, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, China
    Coastal Area Port Industry Development Collaborative Innovation Center, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, China)

  • Guoan Yang

    (School of Arts and Design, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, China)

Abstract

Fine-grained feature extraction and affective semantic mapping remain significant challenges in product form analysis. To address these issues, this study proposes a contrastive learning-based cross-modal fusion approach for product form imagery recognition, using the front-end design of new energy vehicles (NEVs) as a case study. The proposed method first employs the Biterm Topic Model (BTM) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to extract thematic patterns and compute weight distributions from consumer review texts, thereby identifying key imagery style labels. These labels are then leveraged for image annotation, facilitating the construction of a multimodal dataset. Next, ResNet-50 and Transformer architectures serve as the image and text encoders, respectively, to extract and represent multimodal features. To ensure effective alignment and deep fusion of textual and visual representations in a shared embedding space, a contrastive learning mechanism is introduced, optimizing cosine similarity between positive and negative sample pairs. Finally, a fully connected multilayer network is integrated at the output of the Transformer and ResNet with Contrastive Learning (TRCL) model to enhance classification accuracy and reliability. Comparative experiments against various deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) demonstrate that the TRCL model effectively integrates semantic and visual information, significantly improving the accuracy and robustness of complex product form imagery recognition. These findings suggest that the proposed method holds substantial potential for large-scale product appearance evaluation and affective cognition research. Moreover, this data-driven fusion underpins sustainable product form design by streamlining evaluation and optimizing resource use.

Suggested Citation

  • Yutong Zhang & Jiantao Wu & Li Sun & Guoan Yang, 2025. "Contrastive Learning-Based Cross-Modal Fusion for Product Form Imagery Recognition: A Case Study on New Energy Vehicle Front-End Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-28, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4432-:d:1654886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4432/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4432/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vaidya, Omkarprasad S. & Kumar, Sushil, 2006. "Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 1-29, February.
    2. Huan Lin & Xiaolei Deng & Jianping Yu & Xiaoliang Jiang & Dongsong Zhang, 2023. "A Study of Sustainable Product Design Evaluation Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Deep Residual Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Ghiassaleh, Arezou & Kocher, Bruno & Czellar, Sandor, 2024. "The effects of benefit-based (vs. attribute-based) product categorizations on mental imagery and purchase behavior," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 239-255.
    4. Yuanjian Du & Xiaoxue Liu & Mobing Cai & Kyungjin Park, 2024. "A Product’s Kansei Appearance Design Method Based on Conditional-Controlled AI Image Generation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-28, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nina Almasifar & Tülay Özdemir Canbolat & Milad Akhavan & Roberto Alonso González-Lezcano, 2021. "Proposing a New Methodology for Monument Conservation “SCOPE MANAGEMENT” by the Use of an Analytic Hierarchy Process Project Management Institute System and the ICOMOS Burra Charter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Sushil, 2019. "Efficient interpretive ranking process incorporating implicit and transitive dominance relationships," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1489-1516, December.
    3. Wang, Ying-Ming & Elhag, Taha M.S., 2007. "A goal programming method for obtaining interval weights from an interval comparison matrix," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 458-471, February.
    4. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    5. Betul Hande Gursoy Haksevenler & Aydin Akpinar & Zeynep Sengul & Berfin Senik & Nur Hanife Orak & Engin Sorhun, 2025. "Integrating Sustainable Development Into Urban Management: A Strategic Green City Index for Cities," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 8132-8150, December.
    6. Lim, Chulmin & Rowsell, Joe & Kim, Seongcheol, 2023. "Exploring the killer domains to create new value: A Comparative case study of Canadian and Korean telcos," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 277998, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    7. Wenshuai Wu & Gang Kou, 2016. "A group consensus model for evaluating real estate investment alternatives," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Rubio-Aliaga, Alvaro & García-Cascales, M. Socorro & Sánchez-Lozano, Juan Miguel & Molina-Garcia, Angel, 2021. "MCDM-based multidimensional approach for selection of optimal groundwater pumping systems: Design and case example," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 213-224.
    9. Zhu, Bin & Xu, Zeshui, 2014. "Stochastic preference analysis in numerical preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 628-633.
    10. Wang, Ying-Ming & Luo, Ying & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2008. "On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 735-747, April.
    11. Jing Xu & Ren Zhang & Yangjun Wang & Hengqian Yan & Quanhong Liu & Yutong Guo & Yongcun Ren, 2022. "A New Framework for Assessment of Offshore Wind Farm Location," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    12. M Tavana & M A Sodenkamp, 2010. "A fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis model for advanced technology assessment at Kennedy Space Center," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(10), pages 1459-1470, October.
    13. Shiyao Zhu & Dezhi Li & Haibo Feng & Tiantian Gu & Jiawei Zhu, 2019. "AHP-TOPSIS-Based Evaluation of the Relative Performance of Multiple Neighborhood Renewal Projects: A Case Study in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-17, August.
    14. Chen Cao & Miaomiao Ying, 2025. "Assessing Water Resource Vulnerability in an Agricultural Basin for Climate Change Adaptation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 39(1), pages 179-205, January.
    15. Jingya Qiao & Mo Wang & Dongqing Zhang & Chenyang Ding & Jingjing Wang & Dawei Xu, 2017. "Synergetic Development Assessment of Urban River System Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, November.
    16. Baffoe, Gideon, 2019. "Exploring the utility of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in ranking livelihood activities for effective and sustainable rural development interventions in developing countries," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 197-204.
    17. Lucas, Rochelle Irene & Promentilla, Michael Angelo & Ubando, Aristotle & Tan, Raymond Girard & Aviso, Kathleen & Yu, Krista Danielle, 2017. "An AHP-based evaluation method for teacher training workshop on information and communication technology," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 93-100.
    18. Reed, Brinton & Chan-Halbrendt, Catherine & Tamang, B.B. & Chaudhary, Narendra, 2014. "Analysis of conservation agriculture preferences for researchers, extension agents, and tribal farmers in Nepal using Analytic Hierarchy Process," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 90-96.
    19. Yao Wen & Hailiu Shi, 2025. "Two-Side Merger and Acquisition Matching: A Perspective Based on Mutual Performance Evaluation Considering the Herd Behavior," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-26, October.
    20. Meiqi Zhou & Huasong Luo & Juhua Hong & Dashuai Gao & Yukun Shen & Maolin Liang, 2023. "Establishment of a value evaluation system for health and wellness tourism resources: Reflections on China’s official tourism resource evaluation criteria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-16, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4432-:d:1654886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.