IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i5p2205-d1352373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the Industry 5.0-Readiness Level of SMEs Using Industry 1.0–5.0 Practices: The Case of the Seafood Processing Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Meena Madhavan

    (College of Maritime Studies and Management, Chiang Mai University, Samut Sakhon 74000, Thailand)

  • Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin

    (College of Maritime Studies and Management, Chiang Mai University, Samut Sakhon 74000, Thailand)

  • Sutee Wangtueai

    (College of Maritime Studies and Management, Chiang Mai University, Samut Sakhon 74000, Thailand)

Abstract

SMEs across the globe have witnessed increasing internal and external pressure to adopt the recent industrial revolution (4.0 & 5.0). There has been pressure for SMEs to adopt Industry 4.0 technologies, but this did not transpire in traditional industries such as agricultural and seafood processing. Also, there is no published evidence of Industry 4.0 technologies’ support for food processing industries to achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDGs). Hence, Industry 5.0 is conceptualized to be (a) human-centric, (b) sustainable, and (c) resilient. However, most of the earlier studies conducted to assess the “Industry 4.0 adoption level” failed to address the respondents’ current level of industrial practices. Therefore, to overcome the research gap, this research aims to measure the current level of industrial practices and I5.0 readiness level of seafood processing SMEs in Thailand. Thus, this research developed a seven-factor framework including “production line”; “major energy source”; “seafood processing”; “packaging”; “labelling”; “anti-bacterial testing methods sensory, texture analyzing and quality control”; and “business process, documentation, and communication”, with forty-two questions related to Industry 1.0–5.0 practices in the context of seafood processing SMEs. The findings reveal that the SMEs are still in I1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 practices. There is minimal adoption of I4.0. However, there is a comparatively higher level of Industry 5.0 readiness among SMEs in terms of business processes, documentation, and communication. Thus, SMEs can adopt Industry 5.0 partially, and escalate step-by-step from Industry 1.0–Industry 4.0 according to changing trends and demand.

Suggested Citation

  • Meena Madhavan & Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Sutee Wangtueai, 2024. "Measuring the Industry 5.0-Readiness Level of SMEs Using Industry 1.0–5.0 Practices: The Case of the Seafood Processing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:2205-:d:1352373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/2205/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/2205/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sindhwani, Rahul & Afridi, Shayan & Kumar, Anil & Banaitis, Audrius & Luthra, Sunil & Singh, Punj Lata, 2022. "Can industry 5.0 revolutionize the wave of resilience and social value creation? A multi-criteria framework to analyze enablers," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Krzysztof Nowacki, 2021. "Accident Risk in the Production Sector of EU Countries—Cohort Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-14, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Morteza Ghobakhloo & Mohammad Iranmanesh & Manuel E. Morales & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Azlan Amran, 2023. "Actions and approaches for enabling Industry 5.0‐driven sustainable industrial transformation: A strategy roadmap," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1473-1494, May.
    2. Lorena Espina-Romero & Jesús Guerrero-Alcedo & Niria Goñi Avila & José Gregorio Noroño Sánchez & Humberto Gutiérrez Hurtado & Aura Quiñones Li, 2023. "Industry 5.0: Tracking Scientific Activity on the Most Influential Industries, Associated Topics, and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Marta Christina Suciu & Doru Alexandru Plesea & Adrian Petre & Adrian Simion & Mircea Ovidiu Mituca & Decebal Dumitrescu & Ana Maria Bocaneala & Ramona Madalina Moroianu & Diana Florentina Nasulea, 2023. "Core Competence—As a Key Factor for a Sustainable, Innovative and Resilient Development Model Based on Industry 5.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Joana Costa & Inês Amorim & João Reis & Nuno Melão, 2023. "User communities: from nice-to-have to must-have," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-35, December.
    5. Lavinia Dovleac & Ioana Bianca Chițu & Eliza Nichifor & Gabriel Brătucu, 2023. "Shaping the Inclusivity in the New Society by Enhancing the Digitainability of Sustainable Development Goals with Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Niloofar Jefroy & Mathew Azarian & Hao Yu, 2022. "Moving from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: What Are the Implications for Smart Logistics?," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1, April.
    7. Mukherjee, Abheek Anjan & Raj, Alok & Aggarwal, Shikha, 2023. "Identification of barriers and their mitigation strategies for industry 5.0 implementation in emerging economies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    8. Gabriela Ioana ENACHE, 2023. "The Impact of Society 5.0 on Supply Chain Management: Opportunities and Challenges," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(2), pages 280-292, May.
    9. Saraji, Mahyar Kamali & Streimikiene, Dalia, 2022. "Evaluating the circular supply chain adoption in manufacturing sectors: A picture fuzzy approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    10. Barbara Iannone & Giulia Caruso, 2023. "“Sustainab-lization”: Sustainability and Digitalization as a Strategy for Resilience in the Coffee Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-32, March.
    11. Miroslav Kelemen & Beata Gavurova & Volodymyr Polishchuk, 2022. "A Complex Hybrid Model for Evaluating Projects to Improve the Sustainability and Health of Regions and Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-26, July.
    12. Sindhwani, Rahul & Singh, Punj Lata & Behl, Abhishek & Afridi, Mohd. Shayan & Sammanit, Debaroti & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar, 2022. "Modeling the critical success factors of implementing net zero emission (NZE) and promoting resilience and social value creation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    13. Gupta, Himanshu & Yadav, Avinash Kumar & Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Khan, Sharfuddin Ahmed & Sharma, Shashi Chandra, 2022. "Strategies to overcome barriers to innovative digitalisation technologies for supply chain logistics resilience during pandemic," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    14. Kolade, Oluwaseun & Owoseni, Adebowale, 2022. "Employment 5.0: The work of the future and the future of work," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    15. Borchardt Miriam & Pereira Giancarlo M. & Milan Gabriel S. & Nogueira Edithe O. & Scavarda Annibal R. & Poltosi Leonel C., 2022. "Industry 5.0 Beyond Technology: An Analysis Through the Lens of Business and Operations Management Literature," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 55(4), pages 305-321, November.
    16. Behl, Abhishek & Singh, Ramandeep & Pereira, Vijay & Laker, Benjamin, 2023. "Analysis of Industry 4.0 and circular economy enablers: A step towards resilient sustainable operations management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:2205-:d:1352373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.