IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7472-d1138137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Core Competence—As a Key Factor for a Sustainable, Innovative and Resilient Development Model Based on Industry 5.0

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Christina Suciu

    (Economics I Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania
    Interdisciplinary Research Group, Romanian Academy, Calea Victoriei 129, 010071 Bucharest, Romania
    Complexity Research Center, National Institute of Economic Research, 13 Septembrie 13, 050711 Bucharest, Romania
    Romanian Academy of Scientists, Ilfov 3, 050094 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Doru Alexandru Plesea

    (Business Administration Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Adrian Petre

    (Business Administration Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Adrian Simion

    (Economics I Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mircea Ovidiu Mituca

    (Economics I Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Decebal Dumitrescu

    (Economics I Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ana Maria Bocaneala

    (Economics I Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ramona Madalina Moroianu

    (Economics I Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Diana Florentina Nasulea

    (Economics I Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to highlight the importance of core competences as an important catalyst to enable a sustainable transition of business models to Industry 5.0. According to our research based on a scientific methodology, we illustrated that Industry 4.0 might greatly affect the labor market by introducing ITC, AI, IR and AR that will change many jobs in most areas of activity. One alternative solution to diminish these negative effects is to accommodate and prepare the shift to a more human-centric approach. In order to better implement this alternative solution and to generate mid- to long-run positive effects (from an economic, social and environmental perspective), we consider it is imperative that human resources be prepared to understand and to use new technologies. We have focused our research context on European countries. We found that only a part of the European Union Member Countries benefit from the use of human resources with advanced digital skills. Under these circumstances, we consider that only some countries will be able to face the challenges generated by the transition to Industry 5.0, while others, the emergent countries, such as Romania, will have to intensify the complex process of designing competitive and coherent strategies and implement a more efficient and effective mix of policies. This will help to better capitalize the potential sustainable competitive advantage of industries 4.0 and 5.0.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Christina Suciu & Doru Alexandru Plesea & Adrian Petre & Adrian Simion & Mircea Ovidiu Mituca & Decebal Dumitrescu & Ana Maria Bocaneala & Ramona Madalina Moroianu & Diana Florentina Nasulea, 2023. "Core Competence—As a Key Factor for a Sustainable, Innovative and Resilient Development Model Based on Industry 5.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7472-:d:1138137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7472/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7472/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marta Gotz & Barbara Jankowska, 2020. "Systemic Change: Adoption of Industry 4.0 Technologies and Company Competitiveness: Case Studies from a Post-Transition Economy," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(4), pages 61-78.
    2. Li Zhang & Yongping Xie & Yang Zheng & Wei Xue & Xianrong Zheng & Xiaobo Xu, 2020. "The challenges and countermeasures of blockchain in finance and economics," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 691-698, July.
    3. J. M. Keynes, 1937. "The General Theory of Employment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 51(2), pages 209-223.
    4. Sindhwani, Rahul & Afridi, Shayan & Kumar, Anil & Banaitis, Audrius & Luthra, Sunil & Singh, Punj Lata, 2022. "Can industry 5.0 revolutionize the wave of resilience and social value creation? A multi-criteria framework to analyze enablers," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mario Di Nardo & Maryam Gallab & Teresa Murino & Jing Wu & Shatrudhan Pandey, 2025. "Integrating Sustainability and Industry 4.0: A Framework for Sustainable Logistics 4.0," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 2157-2195, June.
    2. Mohammed Alquraish, 2025. "Digital Transformation, Supply Chain Resilience, and Sustainability: A Comprehensive Review with Implications for Saudi Arabian Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-33, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roos, Michael W. M., 2015. "The macroeconomics of radical uncertainty," Ruhr Economic Papers 592, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    2. Laura Alfaro & Anusha Chari & Andrew N. Greenland & Peter K. Schott, 2020. "Aggregate and Firm-Level Stock Returns During Pandemics, in Real Time," NBER Working Papers 26950, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Charles J. Whalen, 2012. "Post-Keynesian Institutionalism after the Great Recession," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_724, Levy Economics Institute.
    4. Lawrence A. Boland, 2016. "Econometrics and equilibrium models," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 438-447, July.
    5. Martha Campbell, 1997. "Marx and Keynes on Money," International Journal of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 65-91, September.
    6. Himounet, Nicolas, 2022. "Searching the nature of uncertainty: Macroeconomic and financial risks VS geopolitical and pandemic risks," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1-31.
    7. Saad, Mohsen & Samet, Anis, 2020. "Collectivism and commonality in liquidity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 137-162.
    8. Giuseppe Garofalo, 2014. "Irreducible complexities: from Gödel and Turing to the paradigm of Imperfect Knowledge Economics," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3463-3474, November.
    9. Georgios Petropoulos & David Pichler & Francesco Chiacchio, 2018. "The impact of industrial robots on EU employment and wages- A local labour market approach," Bruegel Working Papers 25186, Bruegel.
    10. Urban Sušnik, 2016. "Janus Ante Portas," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 48(3), pages 417-437, September.
    11. repec:osf:osfxxx:jm7h4_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Ravi Kashyap, 2016. "Solving the Equity Risk Premium Puzzle and Inching Towards a Theory of Everything," Papers 1604.04872, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.
    13. Yuan, Na & Gao, Yihong, 2022. "Does green credit policy impact corporate cash holdings?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    14. Benjamin Patrick Evans & Mikhail Prokopenko, 2021. "Bounded rationality for relaxing best response and mutual consistency: The Quantal Hierarchy model of decision-making," Papers 2106.15844, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    15. Lucio Gobbi & Ronny Mazzocchi & Roberto Tamborini, 2022. "Monetary policy, rational confidence, and Neo‐Fisherian depressions," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(4), pages 1179-1199, November.
    16. Phil Armstrong, 2020. "Can Heterodox Economics Make a Difference?," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 19964, March.
    17. Falkinger, Josef, 2016. "The order of knowledge and robust action: How to deal with economic uncertainty?," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 10, pages 1-30.
    18. Roger E.A. Farmer & Giovanni Nicolò, 2021. "Some International Evidence for Keynesian Economics Without the Phillips Curve," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 89(S1), pages 1-22, September.
    19. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & John G. Keogh & Edit Süle, 2025. "When Industry 5.0 Meets the Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 2621-2652, August.
    20. Alain Chateauneuf & Luciano De Castro, 2011. "Ambiguity Aversion and Absence of Trade," Discussion Papers 1535, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    21. F. Cavalli & A. Naimzada & N. Pecora & M. Pireddu, 2021. "Market sentiment and heterogeneous agents in an evolutive financial model," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1189-1219, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7472-:d:1138137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.