IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5554-d1103799.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industry 5.0: Tracking Scientific Activity on the Most Influential Industries, Associated Topics, and Future Research Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Lorena Espina-Romero

    (Escuela de Postgrado, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15024, Peru)

  • Jesús Guerrero-Alcedo

    (Carrera de Psicología, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima 15067, Peru)

  • Niria Goñi Avila

    (Escuela de Postgrado, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15024, Peru)

  • José Gregorio Noroño Sánchez

    (Facultad de Derecho, Universidad del Sinú “Elías Bechara Zainúm”, Monteria 230001, Colombia)

  • Humberto Gutiérrez Hurtado

    (Escuela de Postgrado, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15024, Peru)

  • Aura Quiñones Li

    (Escuela de Posgrado, Universidad César Vallejo, Lima 15314, Peru)

Abstract

Industry 5.0 arrived and sounded the alarms, warning entrepreneurs to adopt it as quickly as possible; the advantage is that this industry is still in its preliminary stages. However, there is little research on this model in the literature. In this context, the objective of this study was to analyze the current state of industry 5.0 in 215 publications from the Scopus database during the period 2019–2022. The applied methodology was quantitative analysis, with a bibliometric approach supported by the VOSviewer and RStudio software, in addition to the Microsoft Excel application. The results showed: (1) an exponential growth of article and conference paper publications in 2022, all indexed in journals of subject areas such as engineering and computer science; (2) four more industries influenced by i5.0, where the electronics sector leads well above manufacturing, energy and public service; (3) seven research topics associated with i5.0 that deal with the transition from industry 4.0 to 5.0; and (4) six little-explored research topics that would help i5.0 move to a new stage and which are related to environmental sustainability, social sustainability, cobots, bioeconomy, smart cities, and sentiment analysis. This study found a gap in the industry 5.0 literature; therefore, this document serves as a guide for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorena Espina-Romero & Jesús Guerrero-Alcedo & Niria Goñi Avila & José Gregorio Noroño Sánchez & Humberto Gutiérrez Hurtado & Aura Quiñones Li, 2023. "Industry 5.0: Tracking Scientific Activity on the Most Influential Industries, Associated Topics, and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5554-:d:1103799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5554/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5554/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aria, Massimo & Cuccurullo, Corrado, 2017. "bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 959-975.
    2. Qian Zhang & Yuming Chen & Wanlong Lin & Yao Chen & Tingsong Wang, 2021. "Optimizing Medical Enterprise’s Operations Management considering Corporate Social Responsibility under Industry 5.0," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-13, November.
    3. Baohong Li & Peng Song & Shi Yin, 2022. "Driving Force Mechanism of the Core Green Technology Innovation of Equipment Manufacturing Enterprises towards Industry 5.0 in China," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-18, August.
    4. Lorena Espina-Romero & Jesús Guerrero-Alcedo, 2022. "Fields Touched by Digitalization: Analysis of Scientific Activity in Scopus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Sindhwani, Rahul & Afridi, Shayan & Kumar, Anil & Banaitis, Audrius & Luthra, Sunil & Singh, Punj Lata, 2022. "Can industry 5.0 revolutionize the wave of resilience and social value creation? A multi-criteria framework to analyze enablers," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Abdul Waheed & Majed Alharthi & Sher Zaman Khan & Muhammad Usman, 2022. "Role of Industry 5.0 in leveraging the Business Performance: Investigating Impact of Shared-Economy on Firms’ Performance with Intervening Role of i5.0 Technologies," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rame, Rame & Purwanto, Purwanto & Sudarno, Sudarno, 2024. "Industry 5.0 and sustainability: An overview of emerging trends and challenges for a green future," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(4).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & John G. Keogh & Edit Süle, 2025. "When Industry 5.0 Meets the Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 2621-2652, August.
    2. Piccarozzi, Michela & Silvestri, Luca & Silvestri, Cecilia & Ruggieri, Alessandro, 2024. "Roadmap to Industry 5.0: Enabling technologies, challenges, and opportunities towards a holistic definition in management studies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    3. Yuchi Zhang, 2024. "A path to sustainable development of agri‐industries: Analysis of agriculture 5.0 versus industry 5.0 using stakeholder theory with moderation of environmental policy," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 4829-4843, October.
    4. Lorena Espina-Romero & Jesús Guerrero-Alcedo & José Gregorio Noroño Sánchez & Angélica Ochoa-Díaz, 2022. "What Are the Topics That Business Ecosystems Navigate? Updating of Scientific Activity and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Haldun Çolak & Bilal Saraç & Celal Hakan Kağnicioğlu, 2025. "Enhancing Supply Chain Resilience via Digital Technologies in Knowledge Economy with an Emphasis on Human Capital: An Integrated Systematic Literature Review and SF-AHP Approach," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 11547-11582, September.
    6. Maria Ijaz Baig & Elaheh Yadegaridehkordi, 2024. "Industry 5.0 applications for sustainability: A systematic review and future research directions," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 662-681, February.
    7. Zeng, Ying & Liu, Xinyi & Zhang, Xinyuan & Li, Zhiyong, 2024. "Retrospective of interdisciplinary research on robot services (1954–2023): From parasitism to symbiosis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    8. Ada P. Smith & Sechindra Vallury & Elizabeth Covelli Metcalf, 2023. "Social dimensions of adaptation to climate change in rangelands: a systematic literature review," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(12), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Merve Anaç & Gulden Gumusburun Ayalp & Kamil Erdayandi, 2023. "Prefabricated Construction Risks: A Holistic Exploration through Advanced Bibliometric Tool and Content Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-31, August.
    10. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Huyen Thanh T. Nguyen & Thanh-Hang Pham & Manh-Toan Ho & Minh-Hoang Nguyen, 2021. "Assessing the ideological homogeneity in entrepreneurial finance research by highly cited publications," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Khayet, Mohamed & Aytaç, Ersin & Essalhi, Mohamed & Cipollina, Andrea & García-Fernández, Loreto & Contreras-Martínez, Jorge & García-Payo, Carmen & Ruiz-García, Alejandro & Figoli, Alberto, 2025. "Elucidating the dynamics of salinity gradient energy research," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    12. Shuangqing Sheng & Wei Song & Hua Lian & Lei Ning, 2022. "Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    13. Maksym Obrizan, 2018. "Economists in Ukraine: who are they and where do they publish?," Working Papers 3181, Research Consulting and Development.
    14. Hongxia Jin & Lu Lu & Haojun Fan, 2022. "Global Trends and Research Hotspots in Long COVID: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Charlie Karlsson & Björn Hammarfelt, 2025. "Correction: The growth and development of Nordic regional science research 1982–2022: bibliometric evidence from thirteen regional science journals," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 74(2), pages 1-1, June.
    16. Zoltán Lakner & Brigitta Plasek & Gyula Kasza & Anna Kiss & Sándor Soós & Ágoston Temesi, 2021. "Towards Understanding the Food Consumer Behavior–Food Safety–Sustainability Triangle: A Bibliometric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, November.
    17. Ying Liang & Wei Song, 2022. "Ecological and Environmental Effects of Land Use and Cover Changes on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: A Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, November.
    18. Lanzalonga Federico & Chmet Federico & Petrolo Basilio & Brescia Valerio, 2023. "Exploring Diversity Management to Avoid Social Washing and Pinkwashing: Using Bibliometric Analysis to Shape Future Research Directions," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 41-65, March.
    19. Md. Nazmus Sakib & Md. Akmol Uddin & Towhida Akter Kona & Kanta Sharmin & Md. Mizanur Rahman & Mohammad Sahabuddin, 2025. "A twenty-two-year journey of sustainable human resource management research: bibliometric analysis," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Jussi T. S. Heikkila, 2020. "Classifying economics for the common good: Connecting sustainable development goals to JEL codes," Papers 2004.04384, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5554-:d:1103799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.