IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i5p2009-d1348444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Poverty Concentrated in Shanghai? Spatial Patterns in Social Housing and Their Implications for Social Equality in Chinese Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan Li

    (Shanghai Academy of Fine Arts, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Xin Feng

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China)

Abstract

It is of general concern how poverty concentrates in cities, due to its close association with social equality issues. This research explores this topic at a citywide level. Spatial data of social housing regarding 2008 to 2020 in Shanghai are utilized to examine how the concentration patterns for low-to-moderate-income groups have changed. Multiple methods including spatial autocorrelation analysis, location quotient (LQ), and Mann–Whitney U test were employed to assess the spatial distribution of, and concentration patterns in, social housing, as well as investigating whether the spatial distribution of urban resources was equitable for residents in social housing. We found that the low-to-moderate-income groups were previously concentrated at the boundary of central city and then gradually deconcentrated into a relatively even pattern. However, it is important to note that this process has not effectively facilitated social equality due to the unequitable distribution of urban resources. Consequently, we recommend that policy makers in developing countries pay particular attention to site selection for social housing and the distribution of urban amenities in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan Li & Xin Feng, 2024. "Is Poverty Concentrated in Shanghai? Spatial Patterns in Social Housing and Their Implications for Social Equality in Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:2009-:d:1348444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/2009/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/2009/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fang, Cheng & Zhang, Xiaobo & Fan, Shenggen, 2002. "Emergence of urban poverty and inequality in China: evidence from household survey," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 430-443, December.
    2. Matthew Freedman & Tamara McGavock, 2015. "Low‐Income Housing Development, Poverty Concentration, and Neighborhood Inequality," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 805-834, September.
    3. Gong, Jinquan & Wang, Gewei & Wang, Yafeng & Zhao, Yaohui, 2022. "Consumption and poverty of older Chinese: 2011–2020," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 23(C).
    4. Douglas Massey, 1996. "The age of extremes: Concentrated affluence and poverty in the twenty-first century," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 33(4), pages 395-412, November.
    5. Kirk McClure & Alex F. Schwartz & Lydia B. Taghavi, 2015. "Housing Choice Voucher Location Patterns a Decade Later," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 215-233, April.
    6. Claudio O. Delang & Ho Cheuk Lung, 2010. "Public Housing and Poverty Concentration in Urban Neighbourhoods: The Case of Hong Kong in the 1990s," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(7), pages 1391-1413, June.
    7. Glaeser, Edward L. & Kahn, Matthew E. & Rappaport, Jordan, 2008. "Why do the poor live in cities The role of public transportation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 1-24, January.
    8. Fulong Wu, 2009. "The State and Marginality: Reflections on Urban Outcasts from China's Urban Transition," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 841-847, September.
    9. Pathak, Rahul & Wyczalkowski, Christopher K. & Huang, Xi, 2017. "Public transit access and the changing spatial distribution of poverty," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 198-212.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trajkovski, Samantha & Zabel, Jeffrey & Schwartz, Amy Ellen, 2021. "Do school buses make school choice work?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    2. Fei Li & Christopher Kajetan Wyczalkowski, 2023. "How buses alleviate unemployment and poverty: Lessons from a natural experiment in Clayton County, GA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(13), pages 2632-2650, October.
    3. Pasha, Obed & Wyczalkowski, Chris & Sohrabian, Dro & Lendel, Iryna, 2020. "Transit effects on poverty, employment, and rent in Cuyahoga County, Ohio," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 33-41.
    4. Rémi Louf & Marc Barthelemy, 2016. "Patterns of Residential Segregation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Tara Watson, 2009. "Inequality And The Measurement Of Residential Segregation By Income In American Neighborhoods," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 55(3), pages 820-844, September.
    6. Heilmann, Kilian, 2018. "Transit access and neighborhood segregation. Evidence from the Dallas light rail system," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 237-250.
    7. Berrebi, Simon J. & Watkins, Kari E., 2020. "Who’s ditching the bus?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 21-34.
    8. Liu, Chengliang & Duan, Dezhong, 2020. "Spatial inequality of bus transit dependence on urban streets and its relationships with socioeconomic intensities: A tale of two megacities in China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    9. Kim, Junghwan & Lee, Bumsoo, 2019. "More than travel time: New accessibility index capturing the connectivity of transit services," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 8-18.
    10. Evelyn Blumenberg & Fariba Siddiq, 2023. "Commute distance and jobs-housing fit," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 869-891, June.
    11. Simon J. Berrebi & Kari E. Watkins, 2020. "Whos Ditching the Bus?," Papers 2001.02200, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2020.
    12. Liu, Chang & Bardaka, Eleni, 2021. "The suburbanization of poverty and changes in access to public transportation in the Triangle Region, NC," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    13. Andrew Schouten, 2022. "Residential relocations and changes in vehicle ownership," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 89-113, February.
    14. Cuberes, David & Roberts, Jennifer & Sechel, Cristina, 2019. "Household location in English cities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 120-135.
    15. Lu Liu & Yu Tian, 2022. "Does the Compact City Paradigm Help Reduce Poverty? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-19, May.
    16. Pathak, Rahul & Wyczalkowski, Christopher K. & Huang, Xi, 2017. "Public transit access and the changing spatial distribution of poverty," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 198-212.
    17. Zan Yang & Songtao Wang, 2011. "The impact of privatization of public housing on housing affordability in Beijing: An assessment using household survey data," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 26(5), pages 384-400, August.
    18. Deepak Saraswat, 2022. "Labor Market Impacts of Exposure to Affordable Housing Supply: Evidence from the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program," Working papers 2022-09, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    19. Kim, Dongsoo & Liu, Feng & Yezer, Anthony, 2009. "Do inter-city differences in intra-city wage differentials have any interesting implications?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 203-209, November.
    20. Matthew J. Holian & Matthew E. Kahn, 2014. "Household Demand for Low Carbon Public Policies: Evidence from California," NBER Working Papers 19965, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:2009-:d:1348444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.