IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i5p1946-d1346880.html

Enhancing Digital Innovation Ecosystem Resilience through the Interplay of Organizational, Technological, and Environmental Factors: A Study of 31 Provinces in China Using NCA and fsQCA

Author

Listed:
  • Ming Zhang

    (College of Economics & Management, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

  • Ruoran Cheng

    (College of Economics & Management, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

  • Jiabao Fei

    (College of Economics & Management, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

  • Ribesh Khanal

    (College of Economics & Management, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

Abstract

Digital innovation ecosystems are currently experiencing a period of growth and are navigating uncertain environments. Improving resilience is an important prerequisite for ensuring sustainable developments. This study, based on the technology, organization, and environment (TOE) framework, examines the impact of multilevel antecedent conditions on digital innovation ecosystem resilience using data from 31 Chinese provinces. By applying a necessary condition analysis (NCA) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), this study reveals complex causal relationships between five antecedents at the “technology–organization–environment” levels and digital innovation ecosystem resilience, along with the improvement paths of digital innovation ecosystem resilience. The results show the following: Firstly, individual antecedent conditions alone do not constitute necessary conditions for high or non-high digital innovation ecosystem resilience. Secondly, there are five configuration paths leading to high digital innovation ecosystem resilience, namely, a digital technology-enabled organization–environment-driven type (H1a), an organization–environment dual-wheel-driven type (H1b), a digital technology-led environment-driven type (H2), a technology–organization–environment trilateral type (H3), and a pressure–organization-driven type (H4). Thirdly, three configuration paths result in non-high digital innovation ecosystem resilience, exhibiting an asymmetric relationship with paths associated with the configuration paths of high digital innovation ecosystem resilience. Finally, potential substitution relationships exist among antecedent conditions at the technological, organizational, and environmental levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Ming Zhang & Ruoran Cheng & Jiabao Fei & Ribesh Khanal, 2024. "Enhancing Digital Innovation Ecosystem Resilience through the Interplay of Organizational, Technological, and Environmental Factors: A Study of 31 Provinces in China Using NCA and fsQCA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1946-:d:1346880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1946/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1946/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mingqiu Li & Heng Chen & Jinqiu Li & Xiaolei Liu, 2023. "How to Improve the Synergetic Development Capabilities of the Innovation Ecosystems of High-Tech Industries in China: An fsQCA Analysis Based on the TOE Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-32, August.
    2. Barbara Vis & Jan Dul, 2018. "Analyzing Relationships of Necessity Not Just in Kind But Also in Degree," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 47(4), pages 872-899, November.
    3. Ragin, Charles C., 2006. "Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 291-310, July.
    4. Hongmei Chen & Songlin Cai, 2023. "Research on Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Regional Digital Innovation Ecosystem Resilience—Empirical Research Based on Panel Data of 30 Provinces and Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guiju Zhu & Yuxing Peng & Changfa Shi & Sha Liu & Haiyun Liu, 2024. "Research on the Driving Paths and Evolution of Digital Innovation in Intelligent Connected Vehicle Enterprises—A Configurational Analysis Based on Dynamic fsQCA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Cai Li & Agyemang Kwasi Sampene & Adnan Khan & John Wiredu, 2025. "Environmental orientations to Innovation Ecosystem: the role of green transition, perceived environmental uncertainty and green transformational leadership," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 48-71, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giuseppe Calignano & Elisabeth Winsents, 2024. "Relations between academic reputation and innovation networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(2), pages 889-908, February.
    2. Kumbure, Mahinda Mailagaha & Tarkiainen, Anssi & Luukka, Pasi & Stoklasa, Jan & Jantunen, Ari, 2020. "Relation between managerial cognition and industrial performance: An assessment with strategic cognitive maps using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 160-172.
    3. Guiju Zhu & Yuxing Peng & Changfa Shi & Sha Liu & Haiyun Liu, 2024. "Research on the Driving Paths and Evolution of Digital Innovation in Intelligent Connected Vehicle Enterprises—A Configurational Analysis Based on Dynamic fsQCA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Sukhov, Alexandre & Friman, Margareta & Olsson, Lars E., 2023. "Unlocking potential: An integrated approach using PLS-SEM, NCA, and fsQCA for informed decision making," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    5. Puxuan Wang & Shuangjin Wang & Maggie Foley & Fangming Lin, 2026. "Configurations for High‐Quality Environmental Disclosure in China's Dual Carbon Era," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(1), pages 49-62, January.
    6. Markus Mayer & Markus Voeth, 2022. "Improving negotiation success in B2B sales organizations: is structured negotiation management a success factor?," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(2), pages 163-196, February.
    7. Zhang, Kai & Cheng, Xiaoting, 2025. "Determinants of consumers’ intentions to use smart home devices from the perspective of perceived value: A mixed SEM, NCA, and fsQCA study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    8. Agnès Helme-Guizon & Fanny Magnoni, 2019. "Consumer brand engagement and its social side on brand-hosted social media: how do they contribute to brand loyalty?," Post-Print hal-03591683, HAL.
    9. Prentice, Catherine & Tianchai, Maneerat & Zeidan, Susan & Wang, Xuequn, 2025. "An asymmetrical pilot resilience model – fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 171-179.
    10. Prosman, Ernst Johannes & Cagliano, Raffaella, 2022. "A contingency perspective on manufacturing configurations for the circular economy: Insights from successful start-ups," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    11. Grohs, Reinhard & Raies, Karine & Koll, Oliver & Mühlbacher, Hans, 2016. "One pie, many recipes: Alternative paths to high brand strength," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2244-2251.
    12. Barry Cooper & Judith Glaesser, 2016. "Analysing necessity and sufficiency with Qualitative Comparative Analysis: how do results vary as case weights change?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 327-346, January.
    13. Yong Shi & Junjie Liu, 2025. "How Climate Risk Affects Enterprise Liquidity: Configuration Effects Based on NCA and fsQCA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-18, February.
    14. Yu-Li Lin & Hsiu-Wen Liu & Fengzeng Xu & Hao Wang, 2016. "Environmental Conditions, Entrepreneur Alertness and Social Capital on Performance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(8), pages 1-13, August.
    15. Zheng, Yunjian & Lin, Chen & Yan, Jiale & Guo, Yani, 2025. "How to enhance the innovation capacity of technology-based enterprises: A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    16. Richter, Nicole Franziska & Hauff, Sven, 2022. "Necessary conditions in international business research–Advancing the field with a new perspective on causality and data analysis," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    17. Wang, Huanming & Ran, Bing, 2022. "How business-related governance strategies impact paths towards the formation of global cities? An institutional embeddedness perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    18. Dogra, Nikhil & Adil, Mohd & Sadiq, Mohd & Dash, Ganesh & Paul, Justin, 2023. "Unraveling customer repurchase intention in OFDL context: An investigation using a hybrid technique of SEM and fsQCA," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    19. Acquah, Innocent Senyo Kwasi & Naude, Micheline Juliana & Oguji, Nnamdi, 2025. "Harnessing the dimensions of supply chain collaboration to promote innovation and flexibility in buyer-supplier relationships: Insights from fsQCA and NCA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    20. Mohammad Soltani Delgosha & Tahereh Saheb & Nastaran Hajiheydari, 0. "Modelling the Asymmetrical Relationships between Digitalisation and Sustainable Competitiveness: A Cross-Country Configurational Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1946-:d:1346880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.