IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1611-d1339119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Travel Plan Sharing and Regulation for Managing Traffic Bottleneck Based on Blockchain Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Senlai Zhu

    (School of Transportation and Civil Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China)

  • Hantao Yu

    (School of Transportation and Civil Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China)

  • Congjun Fan

    (Nantong Port Group Construction Investment Co., Ltd., Nantong 226000, China)

Abstract

To alleviate traffic congestion, it is necessary to effectively manage traffic bottlenecks. In existing research, travel demand prediction for traffic bottlenecks is based on travel behavior assumptions, and prediction accuracy is low in practice. Thus, the effect of traffic bottleneck management strategies cannot be guaranteed. Management strategies are often mandatory, leading to problems such as unfairness and low social acceptance. To address such issues, this paper proposes managing traffic bottlenecks based on shared travel plans. To solve the information security and privacy problems caused by travel plan sharing and achieve information transparency, travel plans are shared and regulated by blockchain technology. To optimize the operation level of traffic bottlenecks, travel plan regulation models under scenarios where all/some travelers share travel plans are proposed and formulated as linear programming models, and these models are integrated into the blockchain with smart contract technology. Furthermore, travel plan regulation models are tested and verified using traffic flow data from the Su-Tong Yangtze River Highway Bridge, China. The results indicate that the proposed travel plan regulation models are effective for alleviating traffic congestion. The vehicle transfer rate and total delay rate increase as the degree of total demand increases; the vehicle transfer rate increases as the length of the time interval decreases; and the vehicle transfer rate and total delay rate increase as the number of vehicles not sharing their travel plans increases. By using the model and method proposed in this paper, the sustainability of urban economy, society, and environment can be promoted. However, there are many practical situations that have not been considered in this paper, such as multiple entry and exit bottlenecks, multiple travel modes, and other control strategies. In addition, this paper considers only one bottleneck rather than road networks because of the throughput limitations of blockchain technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Senlai Zhu & Hantao Yu & Congjun Fan, 2024. "Travel Plan Sharing and Regulation for Managing Traffic Bottleneck Based on Blockchain Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1611-:d:1339119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1611/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1611/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bao, Yue & Verhoef, Erik T. & Koster, Paul, 2019. "Regulating dynamic congestion externalities with tradable credit schemes: Does a unique equilibrium exist?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 225-236.
    2. Liu, Yang & Li, Yuanyuan & Hu, Lu, 2018. "Departure time and route choices in bottleneck equilibrium under risk and ambiguity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 774-793.
    3. Li, Zhi-Chun & Huang, Hai-Jun & Yang, Hai, 2020. "Fifty years of the bottleneck model: A bibliometric review and future research directions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 311-342.
    4. Guo, Ren-Yong & Yang, Hai & Huang, Hai-Jun & Li, Xinwei, 2018. "Day-to-day departure time choice under bounded rationality in the bottleneck model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 832-849.
    5. Zhao, Yan & Guo, Xiaolei & Liu, Henry X., 2021. "The impact of autonomous vehicles on commute ridesharing with uncertain work end time," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 221-248.
    6. Frascaria, Dario & Olver, Neil & Verhoef, Erik, 2020. "Emergent hypercongestion in Vickrey bottleneck networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 523-538.
    7. Li, Zhi-Chun & Lam, William H.K. & Wong, S.C., 2014. "Bottleneck model revisited: An activity-based perspective," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 262-287.
    8. Yu, Xiaojuan & van den Berg, Vincent A.C. & Verhoef, Erik T., 2019. "Carpooling with heterogeneous users in the bottleneck model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 178-200.
    9. Chen, Zhi & Wu, Wen-Xiang & Huang, Hai-Jun & Shang, Hua-Yan, 2022. "Modeling traffic dynamics in periphery-downtown urban networks combining Vickrey's theory with Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram: user equilibrium, system optimum, and cordon pricing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 278-303.
    10. Ma, Rui & Zhang, H.M., 2017. "The morning commute problem with ridesharing and dynamic parking charges," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 345-374.
    11. Lu, Gongyuan & Nie, Yu(Marco) & Liu, Xiaobo & Li, Denghui, 2019. "Trajectory-based traffic management inside an autonomous vehicle zone," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 76-98.
    12. Xiao, Feng & Shen, Wei & Michael Zhang, H., 2012. "The morning commute under flat toll and tactical waiting," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1346-1359.
    13. Zhong, Lin & Zhang, Kenan & (Marco) Nie, Yu & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Dynamic carpool in morning commute: Role of high-occupancy-vehicle (HOV) and high-occupancy-toll (HOT) lanes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 98-119.
    14. Liu, Wei & Zhang, Fangni & Yang, Hai, 2017. "Modeling and managing morning commute with both household and individual travels," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 227-247.
    15. Wang, Junjin & Liu, Jiaguo & Wang, Fan & Yue, Xiaohang, 2021. "Blockchain technology for port logistics capability: Exclusive or sharing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 347-392.
    16. Wang, Jing-Peng & Ban, Xuegang (Jeff) & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2019. "Dynamic ridesharing with variable-ratio charging-compensation scheme for morning commute," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 390-415.
    17. Chen, Jin-Yong & Jiang, Rui & Li, Xin-Gang & Hu, Mao-Bin & Jia, Bin & Gao, Zi-You, 2019. "Morning commute problem with queue-length-dependent bottleneck capacity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 184-215.
    18. Xiao, Ling-Ling & Liu, Tian-Liang & Huang, Hai-Jun & Liu, Ronghui, 2021. "Temporal-spatial allocation of bottleneck capacity for managing morning commute with carpool," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 177-200.
    19. Sun, Jian & Wu, Jiyan & Xiao, Feng & Tian, Ye & Xu, Xiangdong, 2020. "Managing bottleneck congestion with incentives," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 143-166.
    20. Xu, Da & Guo, Xiaolei & Zhang, Guoqing, 2019. "Constrained optimization for bottleneck coarse tolling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 1-22.
    21. Xiao, Ling-Ling & Liu, Tian-Liang & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2016. "On the morning commute problem with carpooling behavior under parking space constraint," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 383-407.
    22. Liu, Yang & Nie, Yu (Marco) & Hall, Jonathan, 2015. "A semi-analytical approach for solving the bottleneck model with general user heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 56-70.
    23. Fan, Wenbo & Xiao, Feng & Nie, Yu (Macro), 2022. "Managing bottleneck congestion with tradable credits under asymmetric transaction cost," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    24. Li, Chuan-Yao & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2018. "User equilibrium of a single-entry traffic corridor with continuous scheduling preference," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 21-38.
    25. Akamatsu, Takashi & Wada, Kentaro & Iryo, Takamasa & Hayashi, Shunsuke, 2021. "A new look at departure time choice equilibrium models with heterogeneous users," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 152-182.
    26. Qixiu Cheng & Jiping Xing & Wendy Yi & Zhiyuan Liu & Xiao Fu, 2019. "Distance-Based Congestion Pricing with Day-to-Day Dynamic Traffic Flow Evolution Process," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-7, January.
    27. Li, Zhi-Chun & Zhang, Liping, 2020. "The two-mode problem with bottleneck queuing and transit crowding: How should congestion be priced using tolls and fares?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 46-76.
    28. Liu, Qiumin & Jiang, Rui & Liu, Ronghui & Zhao, Hui & Gao, Ziyou, 2020. "Travel cost budget based user equilibrium in a bottleneck model with stochastic capacity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1-37.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Zhi-Chun & Huang, Hai-Jun & Yang, Hai, 2020. "Fifty years of the bottleneck model: A bibliometric review and future research directions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 311-342.
    2. Zhu, Tingting & Li, Yao & Long, Jiancheng, 2022. "Departure time choice equilibrium and tolling strategies for a bottleneck with continuous scheduling preference," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    3. Xiao, Ling-Ling & Liu, Tian-Liang & Huang, Hai-Jun & Liu, Ronghui, 2021. "Temporal-spatial allocation of bottleneck capacity for managing morning commute with carpool," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 177-200.
    4. Wu, Jiyan & Tian, Ye & Sun, Jian, 2023. "Managing ridesharing with incentives in a bottleneck model," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Fan, Wenbo & Xiao, Feng & Nie, Yu (Macro), 2022. "Managing bottleneck congestion with tradable credits under asymmetric transaction cost," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    6. Zhang, Xiang & Liu, Wei & Levin, Michael & Travis Waller, S., 2023. "Equilibrium analysis of morning commuting and parking under spatial capacity allocation in the autonomous vehicle environment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    7. Tang, Zhe-Yi & Tian, Li-Jun & Wang, David Z.W., 2021. "Multi-modal morning commute with endogenous shared autonomous vehicle penetration considering parking space constraint," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Lu, Xiao-Shan & Huang, Hai-Jun & Guo, Ren-Yong & Xiong, Fen, 2021. "Linear location-dependent parking fees and integrated daily commuting patterns with late arrival and early departure in a linear city," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 293-322.
    9. Huang, Zhihui & Long, Jiancheng & Szeto, W.Y. & Liu, Haoxiang, 2021. "Modeling and managing the morning commute problem with park-and-ride-sharing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 190-226.
    10. Zhang, Xiang & Liu, Wei & Waller, S. Travis & Yin, Yafeng, 2019. "Modelling and managing the integrated morning-evening commuting and parking patterns under the fully autonomous vehicle environment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 380-407.
    11. Tian, Li-Jun & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2019. "The morning commute problem with endogenous shared autonomous vehicle penetration and parking space constraint," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 258-278.
    12. Zhang, Fangni & Liu, Wei & Wang, Xiaolei & Yang, Hai, 2017. "A new look at the morning commute with household shared-ride: How does school location play a role?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 198-217.
    13. Li, Yuanyuan & Liu, Yang, 2021. "Optimizing flexible one-to-two matching in ride-hailing systems with boundedly rational users," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    14. Yu, Xiaojuan & van den Berg, Vincent A.C. & Li, Zhi-Chun, 2023. "Congestion pricing and information provision under uncertainty: Responsive versus habitual pricing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    15. Zhang, Fang & Lu, Jian & Hu, Xiaojian & Fan, Ruochuan & Chen, Junlan, 2022. "Managing bottleneck congestion with tradable credit scheme under demand uncertainty," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    16. Li, Wei-Hong & Huang, Hai-Jun & Shang, Hua-Yan, 2020. "Dynamic equilibrium commuting in a multilane system with ridesharing," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 557(C).
    17. Yu, Xiaojuan & van den Berg, Vincent A.C. & Verhoef, Erik T., 2019. "Carpooling with heterogeneous users in the bottleneck model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 178-200.
    18. Li, Chuan-Yao & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2018. "User equilibrium of a single-entry traffic corridor with continuous scheduling preference," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 21-38.
    19. Bao, Yue & Xiao, Feng & Gao, Zaihan & Gao, Ziyou, 2017. "Investigation of the traffic congestion during public holiday and the impact of the toll-exemption policy," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 58-81.
    20. Vincent van den Berg, "undated". "Self-financing roads under coarse tolling and heterogeneous preferences," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 22-045/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1611-:d:1339119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.