IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1383-d1334633.html

A New Resource Allocation Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Method in a Two-Stage Inverse Data Envelopment Analysis Framework for the Sustainable Development of Chinese Commercial Banks

Author

Listed:
  • Li-Huan Liao

    (Law School, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China)

  • Lei Chen

    (School of Economics & Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China)

  • Junchao Wang

    (The Higher Educational Key Laboratory for Flexible Manufacturing Equipment Integration of Fujian Province, Xiamen Institute of Technology, Xiamen 361021, China)

Abstract

The resource allocation of commercial banks is a multiple-criteria decision-making issue with complex internal structure, and traditional inverse data envelopment analysis cannot meet its decision-making needs. A two-stage structure with undesirable outputs is constructed to describe the operations of a Chinese commercial bank, and then a new two-stage inverse data envelopment analysis with undesirable outputs is proposed to address its resource allocation multiple criteria decision-making issue. The new method can be used to calculate the minimum input increment required to achieve the goals of desirable and undesirable output under a certain efficiency, and then a specific resource allocation plan can be obtained to promote the sustainable development of commercial banks. Finally, the new method is applied to the resource allocation of 16 Chinese listed commercial banks in 2013, and the application results fully demonstrate the effectiveness of the new method.

Suggested Citation

  • Li-Huan Liao & Lei Chen & Junchao Wang, 2024. "A New Resource Allocation Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Method in a Two-Stage Inverse Data Envelopment Analysis Framework for the Sustainable Development of Chinese Commercial Banks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1383-:d:1334633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1383/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1383/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Safiullah, Md & Shamsuddin, Abul, 2022. "Technical efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks with undesirable output: Evidence from a stochastic meta-frontier directional distance function," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    2. Chen, Yao & Cook, Wade D. & Li, Ning & Zhu, Joe, 2009. "Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(3), pages 1170-1176, August.
    3. Xie, Qiwei & Xu, Qifan & Chen, Lifan & Jin, Xi & Li, Siqi & Li, Yongjun, 2022. "Efficiency evaluation of China's listed commercial banks based on a multi-period leader-follower model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    4. Staub, Roberta B. & da Silva e Souza, Geraldo & Tabak, Benjamin M., 2010. "Evolution of bank efficiency in Brazil: A DEA approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 204-213, April.
    5. Jiawei Yang, 2023. "Disentangling the sources of bank inefficiency: a two-stage network multi-directional efficiency analysis approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(1), pages 369-410, July.
    6. Bao-Ngoc Tong & Cheng-Ping Cheng & Lien-Wen Liang & Yi-Jun Liu, 2023. "Using Network DEA to Explore the Effect of Mobile Payment on Taiwanese Bank Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Zhen Zhang & Zhuolin Li, 2023. "Consensus-based TOPSIS-Sort-B for multi-criteria sorting in the context of group decision-making," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 911-938, June.
    8. Seiford, Lawrence M. & Zhu, Joe, 2002. "Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 16-20, October.
    9. Atefeh Younesi & Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi & Manuel Arana-Jiménez, 2023. "Using slacks-based model to solve inverse DEA with integer intervals for input estimation," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 587-609, December.
    10. Wang, Ke & Huang, Wei & Wu, Jie & Liu, Ying-Nan, 2014. "Efficiency measures of the Chinese commercial banking system using an additive two-stage DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 5-20.
    11. Li, Yang, 2020. "Analyzing efficiencies of city commercial banks in China: An application of the bootstrapped DEA approach," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Masoumi Hazhir, Maryam & Foroughi, Ali Asghar, 2025. "A survey on resource and fixed cost allocation research with data envelopment analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Feng & Zhu, Qingyuan & Chen, Zhi, 2019. "Allocating a fixed cost across the decision making units with two-stage network structures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 139-154.
    2. Dan Li & Yanfeng Li & Yeming Gong & Jiawei Yang, 2021. "Estimation of bank performance from multiple perspectives: an alternative solution to the deposit dilemma," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 151-170, December.
    3. Liu, Wenbin & Zhou, Zhongbao & Ma, Chaoqun & Liu, Debin & Shen, Wanfang, 2015. "Two-stage DEA models with undesirable input-intermediate-outputs," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 74-87.
    4. Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Matousek, Roman & Tzeremes, Nickolaos G., 2024. "A unified framework for nonperforming loan modeling in bank production: An application of data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    5. Li, Xingchen & Xu, Guangcheng & Wu, Jie & Xu, Chengzhen & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2024. "Evaluation of bank efficiency by considering the uncertainty of nonperforming loans," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    6. Jie Wu & Qingyuan Zhu & Junfei Chu & Liang Liang, 2015. "Two-Stage Network Structures with Undesirable Intermediate Outputs Reused: A DEA Based Approach," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 46(3), pages 455-477, October.
    7. Wei-Hsin Kong & Tsu-Tan Fu & Ming-Miin Yu, 2017. "Evaluating Taiwanese Bank Efficiency Using the Two-Stage Range DEA Model," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04), pages 1043-1068, July.
    8. Wu, Jie & Zhu, Qingyuan & Ji, Xiang & Chu, Junfei & Liang, Liang, 2016. "Two-stage network processes with shared resources and resources recovered from undesirable outputs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 182-197.
    9. N. Torabi Golsefid & M. Salahi, 2023. "An SOCP approach to a two-stage network DEA with feedbacks and shared resources," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(3), pages 1153-1178, September.
    10. Qingyou Yan & Fei Zhao & Xu Wang & Tomas Balezentis, 2021. "The Environmental Efficiency Analysis Based on the Three-Step Method for Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    11. Ang, Sheng & Liu, Pei & Yang, Feng, 2020. "Intra-Organizational and inter-organizational resource allocation in two-stage network systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. Sunil Mohanty & Hong-Jen Lin, 2021. "Efficiency in China’s Banking Sector: A Comparative Analysis of Pre- and Post-Basel II Eras," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(02), pages 1-29, June.
    13. Hsiao-Yen Mao & Wen-Min Lu & Hsin-Yen Shieh, 2023. "Exploring the Influence of Environmental Investment on Multinational Enterprises’ Performance from the Sustainability and Marketability Efficiency Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, May.
    14. Adler, Nicole & Volta, Nicola, 2016. "Accounting for externalities and disposability: A directional economic environmental distance function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 314-327.
    15. Kao, Chiang, 2016. "Efficiency decomposition and aggregation in network data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 778-786.
    16. Xiaohong Liu & Feng Yang & Jie Wu, 2020. "DEA considering technological heterogeneity and intermediate output target setting: the performance analysis of Chinese commercial banks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 605-626, August.
    17. Wu, Jie & Xu, Guangcheng & Zhu, Qingyuan & Zhang, Chaochao, 2021. "Two-stage DEA models with fairness concern: Modelling and computational aspects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    18. Yudi Yang & Fan Yang & Xiajie Yi & Dongwei He, 2025. "How FinTech affects financial sustainability: Evidence from Chinese commercial banks using a three-stage network DEA-Malmquist model," Papers 2511.02608, arXiv.org.
    19. Zhu, Ning & Hougaard, Jens Leth & Yu, Zhiqian & Wang, Bing, 2020. "Ranking Chinese commercial banks based on their expected impact on structural efficiency," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    20. Huang, Chin-wei & Ho, Foo Nin & Chiu, Yung-ho, 2014. "Measurement of tourist hotels׳ productive efficiency, occupancy, and catering service effectiveness using a modified two-stage DEA model in Taiwan," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 49-59.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1383-:d:1334633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.