IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1383-d1334633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Resource Allocation Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Method in a Two-Stage Inverse Data Envelopment Analysis Framework for the Sustainable Development of Chinese Commercial Banks

Author

Listed:
  • Li-Huan Liao

    (Law School, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China)

  • Lei Chen

    (School of Economics & Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China)

  • Junchao Wang

    (The Higher Educational Key Laboratory for Flexible Manufacturing Equipment Integration of Fujian Province, Xiamen Institute of Technology, Xiamen 361021, China)

Abstract

The resource allocation of commercial banks is a multiple-criteria decision-making issue with complex internal structure, and traditional inverse data envelopment analysis cannot meet its decision-making needs. A two-stage structure with undesirable outputs is constructed to describe the operations of a Chinese commercial bank, and then a new two-stage inverse data envelopment analysis with undesirable outputs is proposed to address its resource allocation multiple criteria decision-making issue. The new method can be used to calculate the minimum input increment required to achieve the goals of desirable and undesirable output under a certain efficiency, and then a specific resource allocation plan can be obtained to promote the sustainable development of commercial banks. Finally, the new method is applied to the resource allocation of 16 Chinese listed commercial banks in 2013, and the application results fully demonstrate the effectiveness of the new method.

Suggested Citation

  • Li-Huan Liao & Lei Chen & Junchao Wang, 2024. "A New Resource Allocation Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Method in a Two-Stage Inverse Data Envelopment Analysis Framework for the Sustainable Development of Chinese Commercial Banks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1383-:d:1334633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1383/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1383/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Staub, Roberta B. & da Silva e Souza, Geraldo & Tabak, Benjamin M., 2010. "Evolution of bank efficiency in Brazil: A DEA approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 204-213, April.
    2. Bao-Ngoc Tong & Cheng-Ping Cheng & Lien-Wen Liang & Yi-Jun Liu, 2023. "Using Network DEA to Explore the Effect of Mobile Payment on Taiwanese Bank Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Atefeh Younesi & Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi & Manuel Arana-Jiménez, 2023. "Using slacks-based model to solve inverse DEA with integer intervals for input estimation," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 587-609, December.
    4. Wang, Ke & Huang, Wei & Wu, Jie & Liu, Ying-Nan, 2014. "Efficiency measures of the Chinese commercial banking system using an additive two-stage DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 5-20.
    5. Safiullah, Md & Shamsuddin, Abul, 2022. "Technical efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks with undesirable output: Evidence from a stochastic meta-frontier directional distance function," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    6. Jiawei Yang, 2023. "Disentangling the sources of bank inefficiency: a two-stage network multi-directional efficiency analysis approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(1), pages 369-410, July.
    7. Zhen Zhang & Zhuolin Li, 2023. "Consensus-based TOPSIS-Sort-B for multi-criteria sorting in the context of group decision-making," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 911-938, June.
    8. Seiford, Lawrence M. & Zhu, Joe, 2002. "Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 16-20, October.
    9. Li, Yang, 2020. "Analyzing efficiencies of city commercial banks in China: An application of the bootstrapped DEA approach," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Doumpos, Michalis & Zopounidis, Constantin & Gounopoulos, Dimitrios & Platanakis, Emmanouil & Zhang, Wenke, 2023. "Operational research and artificial intelligence methods in banking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 1-16.
    2. Li, Feng & Zhu, Qingyuan & Chen, Zhi, 2019. "Allocating a fixed cost across the decision making units with two-stage network structures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 139-154.
    3. E. Nur Ozkan Gunay, 2012. "Risk Incorporation and Efficiency in Emerging Market Banks During the Global Crisis: Evidence from Turkey, 2002-2009," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(S5), pages 91-102, November.
    4. Sunil Mohanty & Hong-Jen Lin, 2021. "Efficiency in China’s Banking Sector: A Comparative Analysis of Pre- and Post-Basel II Eras," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(02), pages 1-29, June.
    5. Zhu, Ning & Hougaard, Jens Leth & Yu, Zhiqian & Wang, Bing, 2020. "Ranking Chinese commercial banks based on their expected impact on structural efficiency," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    6. Dan Li & Yanfeng Li & Yeming Gong & Jiawei Yang, 2021. "Estimation of bank performance from multiple perspectives: an alternative solution to the deposit dilemma," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 151-170, December.
    7. Jie Wu & Qingyuan Zhu & Junfei Chu & Liang Liang, 2015. "Two-Stage Network Structures with Undesirable Intermediate Outputs Reused: A DEA Based Approach," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 46(3), pages 455-477, October.
    8. Jun-Fei Chu & Jie Wu & Ma-Lin Song, 2018. "An SBM-DEA model with parallel computing design for environmental efficiency evaluation in the big data context: a transportation system application," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 105-124, November.
    9. Qingxian An & Haoxun Chen & Jie Wu & Liang Liang, 2015. "Measuring slacks-based efficiency for commercial banks in China by using a two-stage DEA model with undesirable output," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 235(1), pages 13-35, December.
    10. Wu, Huaqing & Lv, Kui & Liang, Liang & Hu, Hanhui, 2017. "Measuring performance of sustainable manufacturing with recyclable wastes: A case from China’s iron and steel industry," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PA), pages 38-47.
    11. Huaqing Wu & Jingyu Yang & Wensheng Wu & Ya Chen, 2023. "Interest rate liberalization and bank efficiency: A DEA analysis of Chinese commercial banks," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(2), pages 467-498, June.
    12. Wei-Hsin Kong & Tsu-Tan Fu & Ming-Miin Yu, 2017. "Evaluating Taiwanese Bank Efficiency Using the Two-Stage Range DEA Model," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04), pages 1043-1068, July.
    13. Xie, Qiwei & Xu, Qifan & Chen, Lifan & Jin, Xi & Li, Siqi & Li, Yongjun, 2022. "Efficiency evaluation of China's listed commercial banks based on a multi-period leader-follower model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    14. Jorge Antunes & Abdollah Hadi-Vencheh & Ali Jamshidi & Yong Tan & Peter Wanke, 2022. "Bank efficiency estimation in China: DEA-RENNA approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1373-1398, August.
    15. Xiaohong Liu & Qingyuan Zhu & Junfei Chu & Xiang Ji & Xingchen Li, 2019. "Environmental Performance and Benchmarking Information for Coal-Fired Power Plants in China: A DEA Approach," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 54(4), pages 1287-1302, December.
    16. Hirofumi Fukuyama & Yong Tan, 2022. "Deconstructing three‐stage overall efficiency into input, output and stability efficiency components with consideration of market power and loan loss provision: An application to Chinese banks," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 953-974, January.
    17. Wu, Jie & Zhu, Qingyuan & Ji, Xiang & Chu, Junfei & Liang, Liang, 2016. "Two-stage network processes with shared resources and resources recovered from undesirable outputs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 182-197.
    18. Yantuan Yu & Jianhuan Huang & Yanmin Shao, 2019. "The Sustainability Performance of Chinese Banks: A New Network Data Envelopment Analysis Approach and Panel Regression," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, March.
    19. Dong, Yizhe & Firth, Michael & Hou, Wenxuan & Yang, Weiwei, 2016. "Evaluating the performance of Chinese commercial banks: A comparative analysis of different types of banks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 280-295.
    20. Liu, Wenbin & Zhou, Zhongbao & Ma, Chaoqun & Liu, Debin & Shen, Wanfang, 2015. "Two-stage DEA models with undesirable input-intermediate-outputs," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 74-87.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1383-:d:1334633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.