IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i3p1195-d1330359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Size Really Matter for the Place Attachment of High-Rise and Low-Rise Housing Estates? A Budapest Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ntombifuthi Precious Nzimande

    (Department of Economic and Social Geography, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary
    Department of Geography, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa)

  • Feroza Morris-Kolawole

    (Department of Geography, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa)

Abstract

The current research seeks to understand the relationship between residential satisfaction and place attachment by assessing where significant differences exist in the social environment among people living in low-rise and high-rise housing estates in Budapest, Hungary. The study employed multistage sampling techniques to collect information on the social environment and the residential satisfaction of individuals living in Budapest’s low-rise and high-rise housing estates. The data consisted of 213 participants over the age of 18. Results reveal that a decrease in the number of dependents within both high-rise ( p = 0.013) and low-rise ( p < 0.001) estates, as well as smaller household sizes in both high-rise ( p = 0.013) and low-rise ( p = 0.005) estates, aligns with lower satisfaction with the social environment. Habitability indices suggest that low-rise estates generally foster a more positive perception of the social environment, stronger community connections, and higher trust among neighbours, supporting the hypothesis that residents in high-rise estates may be dissatisfied with their social surroundings. Notably, the logistic regression analysis highlights a negative association (β = −0.12) between the satisfaction index (SI) and overall satisfaction in high-rise housing, emphasizing that higher SI values are linked to lower odds of satisfaction in this context. Conversely, the low-rise model shows a statistically significant positive association ( p < 0.005) between SI and overall satisfaction. Thus, the size of the residential building does matter when it comes to individuals feeling attached to their residential environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Ntombifuthi Precious Nzimande & Feroza Morris-Kolawole, 2024. "Does Size Really Matter for the Place Attachment of High-Rise and Low-Rise Housing Estates? A Budapest Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1195-:d:1330359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1195/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1195/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paulina Rodríguez-Díaz & Rocío Almuna & Carla Marchant & Sally Heinz & Roxana Lebuy & Juan L. Celis-Diez & Pablo Díaz-Siefer, 2022. "The Future of Rurality: Place Attachment among Young Inhabitants of Two Rural Communities of Mediterranean Central Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Alden Speare, 1974. "Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 11(2), pages 173-188, May.
    3. Cheryl S.F. Chi & Jianhua Xu & Lan Xue, 2014. "Public participation in environmental impact assessment for public projects: a case of non-participation," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(9), pages 1422-1440, September.
    4. Minou Weijs-Perrée & Pauline Van den Berg & Theo Arentze & Astrid Kemperman, 2017. "Social networks, social satisfaction and place attachment in the neighborhood," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 4, pages 133-151.
    5. Saleh Kalantari & Mardelle Shepley, 2021. "Psychological and social impacts of high-rise buildings: a review of the post-occupancy evaluation literature," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(8), pages 1147-1176, October.
    6. Eziyi Ibem & Dolapo Amole, 2013. "Residential Satisfaction in Public Core Housing in Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(1), pages 563-581, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mitra Ghafourian & Elham Hesari, 2018. "Evaluating the Model of Causal Relations Between Sense of Place and Residential Satisfaction in Iranian Public Housing (The Case of Mehr Housing in Pardis, Tehran)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 695-721, September.
    2. Yu Cao & Cong Xu & Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman & Nur Mardhiyah Aziz, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Green Building Development in China: Advantages, Challenges and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, September.
    3. M. Sirgy & Robin Widgery & Dong-Jin Lee & Grace Yu, 2010. "Developing a Measure of Community Well-Being Based on Perceptions of Impact in Various Life Domains," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 96(2), pages 295-311, April.
    4. Sueun Jung & Jihyun Lee, 2023. "Exploring a Conceptual Framework of Koreans’ Residential Satisfaction Based on Maslow’s Human Needs: A Qualitative and Quantitative Integrated Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-40, September.
    5. Shi Chen & Yi Sun & Bo Kyong Seo, 2022. "The Effects of Public Open Space on Older People’s Well-Being: From Neighborhood Social Cohesion to Place Dependence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Matel Anna, 2020. "Tenure Status, Housing Conditions and Residential Satisfaction of Adolescents," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 28(4), pages 24-32, December.
    7. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2018. "도이모이 이후 베트남의 주거 이동, 선택, 가격 결정요인 연구: 호치민시 사례 중심으로," OSF Preprints 6kdfy, Center for Open Science.
    8. Fan Wu & Yue Liu & Yingyan Zeng & Hui Yan & Yi Zhang & Ling-Hin Li, 2020. "Evaluation of the Human Settlements Environment of Public Housing Community: A Case Study of Guangzhou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Nijkamp, Peter & Poot, Jacques, 2015. "Cultural Diversity: A Matter of Measurement," IZA Discussion Papers 8782, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Tineke Fokkema & Jenny Gierveld & Peter Nijkamp, 1996. "Big Cities, Big Problems: Reason for the Elderly to Move?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(2), pages 353-377, March.
    11. Koubi, Vally & Spilker, Gabriele & Schaffer, Lena & Bernauer, Thomas, 2016. "Environmental Stressors and Migration: Evidence from Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 197-210.
    12. Tilman Brück & Neil T. N. Ferguson, 2020. "Money can’t buy love but can it buy peace? Evidence from the EU Programme for Peace and Reconciliation (PEACE II)," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(5), pages 536-558, September.
    13. Yuemei Zhu & Junxiang Ding & Qing Zhu & Yang Cheng & Qiuchen Ma & Xuze Ji, 2017. "The Impact of Green Open Space on Community Attachment—A Case Study of Three Communities in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, April.
    14. Robert Konopaske & Chet Robie & John M. Ivancevich, 2009. "Managerial Willingness to Assume Traveling, Short-term and Long-term Global Assignments," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 359-387, June.
    15. Stoyan V. Sgourev & Ezra W. Zuckerman, 2011. "Breaking up is hard to do: Irrational inconsistency in commitment to an industry peer network," Rationality and Society, , vol. 23(1), pages 3-34, February.
    16. Alfred Nucci & Charles Tolbert & Troy Blanchard & Michael Irwin, 2002. "Leaving Home: Modeling the Effect of Civic and Economic Structure on Individual Migration Patterns," Working Papers 02-16, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    17. Rory Coulter & Maarten van Ham & Peteke Feijten, 2011. "A Longitudinal Analysis of Moving Desires, Expectations and Actual Moving Behaviour," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(11), pages 2742-2760, November.
    18. Li, Mengying & Johnson, Sara B. & Newman, Sandra & Riley, Anne W., 2019. "Residential mobility and long-term exposure to neighborhood poverty among children born in poor families: A U.S. longitudinal cohort study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 69-76.
    19. Frank Kalter & Gisela Will, 2016. "Social Capital in Polish-German Migration Decision-Making," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 666(1), pages 46-63, July.
    20. Jinliu Chen & Paola Pellegrini & Haoqi Wang, 2022. "Comparative Residents’ Satisfaction Evaluation for Socially Sustainable Regeneration—The Case of Two High-Density Communities in Suzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1195-:d:1330359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.