IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i3p1113-d1328227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Brand Lovemark on Reusable Cups in Coffee Shops: Machine Use Intention, Willingness to Pay a Deposit, and Green Brand Loyalty

Author

Listed:
  • Yooin Noh

    (Department of Hospitality Management, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65201, USA)

  • Min Jung Kim

    (Department of Hospitality Management, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65201, USA)

  • Dae-Young Kim

    (Department of Hospitality Management, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65201, USA)

Abstract

Despite significant coffee shops’ efforts to promote sustainable practices, customers’ actual CSR engagement in the coffee shop industry is still low. This is because CSR practices in the hospitality industry often require customer engagement, which can sometimes be inconvenient for customers, and some customers may even be skeptical about green practices themselves. Thus, this study examines the effect of brand lovemark on three customer behavioral outcomes (i.e., green brand loyalty, willingness to pay a deposit, and machine use intention) in coffee shops’ CSR practices. We used a scenario-based experimental design on CSR practices in two coffee shop brands (i.e., Starbucks and Dunkin’). The study demonstrates that consumers with a high brand lovemark act more positively toward coffee shop CSR practices than customers with a low brand lovemark. In addition, the interactions between brand lovemark and gender appear to be important in all three behavioral outcomes. Specifically, it confirms that men and women show different levels of behavior outcomes depending on their level of brand lovemark. Theoretical and managerial implications are also suggested with the direction for future study.

Suggested Citation

  • Yooin Noh & Min Jung Kim & Dae-Young Kim, 2024. "The Effect of Brand Lovemark on Reusable Cups in Coffee Shops: Machine Use Intention, Willingness to Pay a Deposit, and Green Brand Loyalty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1113-:d:1328227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1113/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1113/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicolau, Juan Luis & Stadlthanner, Katja Anna & Andreu, Luisa & Font, Xavier, 2022. "Explaining the willingness of consumers to bring their own reusable coffee cups under the condition of monetary incentives," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Barbara Carroll & Aaron Ahuvia, 2006. "Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 79-89, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gwarlann Kerviler & Nico Heuvinck & Elodie Gentina, 2022. "“Make an Effort and Show Me the Love!” Effects of Indexical and Iconic Authenticity on Perceived Brand Ethicality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 89-110, August.
    2. Tarcia Camily Cavalcante Quezado & Nuno Fortes & William Quezado Figueiredo Cavalcante, 2022. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics on Brand Fidelity: The Importance of Brand Love and Brand Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Rahida Abd Rahman & Azleen Ilias, 2025. "Analysis of Brand Love on English Football Teams," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(1), pages 2576-2593, January.
    4. Anwar Sadat Shimul, 2022. "Brand attachment: a review and future research," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(4), pages 400-419, July.
    5. Shir-Way Siew & Michael S. Minor & Reto Felix, 2018. "The influence of perceived strength of brand origin on willingness to pay more for luxury goods," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(6), pages 591-605, November.
    6. Noor Hasmini Binti Abd Ghani & Mohammad Kashedul Wahab Tuhin, 2016. "Consumer Brand Relationships," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 6(4), pages 950-957.
    7. Alvarez, Claudio & David, Meredith E. & George, Morris, 2023. "Types of Consumer-Brand Relationships: A systematic review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    8. Bahtýþen Kavak & Canan Eryiðit & Öznur Özkan Tektaþ & Pýnar Baþgöze, 2010. "Effects Of Hedonic - Utilitarian Motives And Life Style On Attitudinal-Behavioral Loyalty," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 24(1+2), pages 21-40.
    9. Anwar Sadat Shimul & Isaac Cheah & Mahabubur Rahman, 2025. "Consumers’ dark personality traits drive gluckschmerz: the interplay of competitiveness and brand love," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 32(2), pages 112-130, March.
    10. Hatice AYDIN, 2017. "Marka Guveni, Farkindaligi ve Benlik Imaj Uyumunun Marka Bagliligina Etkisinde Marka Askinin Aracilik Rolu," Ege Academic Review, Ege University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 17(2), pages 281-294.
    11. Dörnyei, Krisztina Rita & Lunardo, Renaud, 2021. "When limited edition packages backfire: The role of emotional value, typicality and need for uniqueness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 233-243.
    12. Dash, Ganesh & Kiefer, Kip & Paul, Justin, 2021. "Marketing-to-Millennials: Marketing 4.0, customer satisfaction and purchase intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 608-620.
    13. Xie Ling & Muhammad Faisal Shahzad & Zia ul Abrar & Jamshid Khan Khattak, 2021. "Determinants of the Intention to Purchase Branded Meat: Mediation of Brand Trust," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    14. Abhigyan Sarkar & Juhi Gahlot Sarkar & S. Sreejesh & M. R. Anusree & Bikramjit Rishi, 2020. "You are so embarrassing, still, I hate you less! Investigating consumers’ brand embarrassment and brand hate," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 93-107, January.
    15. Sobia Zaman & Asif Khurshid, 2020. "Effect of Escalator Use on Mall Love among Adult Pakistani Visitors," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 16(1), pages 211-237.
    16. Iivi Riivits-Arkonsuo & Anu Leppiman, 2015. "Young Consumers and their Brand Love," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 5(10), pages 33-44, Octomber.
    17. Eelen, Jiska & Özturan, Peren & Verlegh, Peeter W.J., 2017. "The differential impact of brand loyalty on traditional and online word of mouth: The moderating roles of self-brand connection and the desire to help the brand," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 872-891.
    18. Fernando Oliveira Santini & Wagner Junior Ladeira & Claudio Hoffmann Sampaio & Diego Costa Pinto, 2018. "The brand experience extended model: a meta-analysis," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(6), pages 519-535, November.
    19. Ching-Wei Ho & Yu-Bing Wang, 2020. "Does Social Media Marketing and Brand Community Play the Role in Building a Sustainable Digital Business Strategy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Xinyue Wang & Nor Asiah Binti Omar, 2023. "Nexus between Brand Love, Loyalty, Affective Commitment and Positive Word of Mouth: In the Context of Social Identity Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1113-:d:1328227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.