IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p10993-d1544115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution of Habitat Quality in Highly Urbanized Areas Based on Bayesian Networks: A Case Study from Shenzhen, China

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Zhang

    (School of Architecture and Fine Arts, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China)

  • Xiaodong Lu

    (School of Architecture and Fine Arts, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China)

  • Zhuangxiu Xie

    (School of Architecture and Fine Arts, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China)

  • Jianjun Ma

    (School of Architecture and Fine Arts, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China)

  • Jiaming Zang

    (Dalian Territory Spatial Planning and Design Co., Ltd., Dalian 116024, China)

Abstract

Rapid urbanization presents significant challenges to biodiversity through habitat degradation, fragmentation, and loss. This study focuses on Shenzhen, China, a highly urbanized region experiencing substantial land use changes and facing a considerable risk of biodiversity decline, to investigate the dynamics of habitat quality over two critical periods: 2010–2015 and 2015–2020. Using the InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs) model for habitat quality assessment and Bayesian networks to analyze causal relationships, this research offers an innovative comparison between habitat recovery and degradation across these two phases. Results indicate that from 2010 to 2015, localized habitat recovery was achieved on 0.53% of the land area due to restoration policies, yet the overall trend remained negative. During the 2015–2020 period, habitat degradation intensified (7.19%) compared to recovery (5.7%); notably, 70.6% of areas that had been previously restored are now experiencing degradation once again. This re-degradation highlights the instability of earlier restoration efforts under ongoing urban pressure. By integrating spatial analysis with Bayesian network modeling, this study provides offers a nuanced understanding of where and why initial recovery efforts were unsuccessful, identifying areas susceptible to persistent degradation. The research emphasizes that urban expansion—particularly the development of construction land, was the primary driver of habitat degradation, while ecological sensitivity played a crucial role in determining the long-term success of recovery efforts. This approach provides valuable insights for designing more effective, sustainable conservation strategies in rapidly urbanizing regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Zhang & Xiaodong Lu & Zhuangxiu Xie & Jianjun Ma & Jiaming Zang, 2024. "Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution of Habitat Quality in Highly Urbanized Areas Based on Bayesian Networks: A Case Study from Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-25, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10993-:d:1544115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10993/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10993/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Biao & Li, Wenhua & Xie, Gaodi, 2010. "Ecosystem services research in China: Progress and perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 1389-1395, May.
    2. A. Berger & R. Hodge, 1998. "Natural Change in the Environment: A Challenge to the Pressure-State-Response Concept," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 255-265, June.
    3. David Tilman & Michael Clark & David R. Williams & Kaitlin Kimmel & Stephen Polasky & Craig Packer, 2017. "Future threats to biodiversity and pathways to their prevention," Nature, Nature, vol. 546(7656), pages 73-81, June.
    4. Markus Leibenath, 2011. "Exploring Substantive Interfaces between Spatial Planning and Ecological Networks in Germany," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 257-270.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ran Wang & Honglin Zhuang & Mingkai Cheng & Hui Yang & Wenfeng Wang & Hui Ci & Zhaojin Yan, 2025. "Spatial and Temporal Variations of Habitat Quality and Influencing Factors in Urban Agglomerations on the North Slope of Tianshan Mountains, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Costanza & Shuang Liu, 2014. "Ecosystem Services and Environmental Governance: Comparing China and the U.S," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 160-170, January.
    2. Kristian Steensen Nielsen & Theresa M. Marteau & Jan M. Bauer & Richard B. Bradbury & Steven Broad & Gayle Burgess & Mark Burgman & Hilary Byerly & Susan Clayton & Dulce Espelosin & Paul J. Ferraro & , 2021. "Biodiversity conservation as a promising frontier for behavioural science," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(5), pages 550-556, May.
    3. Tan Li & Qingguo Zhang & Ying Zhang, 2018. "Modelling a Compensation Standard for a Regional Forest Ecosystem: A Case Study in Yanqing District, Beijing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Muhallil Abtahee & Afra Anika Islam & Md. Nazmul Haque & Hasan Zonaed & Samiha Mahzabin Ritu & Sk Md Imdadul Islam & Atiq Zaman, 2023. "Mapping Ecotourism Potential in Bangladesh: The Integration of an Analytical Hierarchy Algorithm and Geospatial Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-28, July.
    5. Marie Lassalas & Sabine Duvaleix & Laure Latruffe, 2024. "The technical and economic effects of biodiversity standards on wheat production," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 51(2), pages 275-308.
    6. Guangdong Li & Chuanglin Fang & James E. M. Watson & Siao Sun & Wei Qi & Zhenbo Wang & Jianguo Liu, 2024. "Mixed effectiveness of global protected areas in resisting habitat loss," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Haiyan Liu & Kangning Xiong & Yanghua Yu & Tingling Li & Yao Qing & Zhifu Wang & Shihao Zhang, 2021. "A Review of Forest Ecosystem Vulnerability and Resilience: Implications for the Rocky Desertification Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Vaugeois, Maxime & Venturelli, Paul A. & Hummel, Stephanie L. & Accolla, Chiara & Forbes, Valery E., 2020. "Population context matters: Predicting the effects of metabolic stress mediated by food availability and predation with an agent- and energy budget-based model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 416(C).
    9. Rachel Mazac & Hanna L. Tuomisto, 2020. "The Post-Anthropocene Diet: Navigating Future Diets for Sustainable Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Daniel H. Pope & Johan O. Karlsson & Phillip Baker & David McCoy, 2021. "Examining the Environmental Impacts of the Dairy and Baby Food Industries: Are First-Food Systems a Crucial Missing Part of the Healthy and Sustainable Food Systems Agenda Now Underway?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Xiaolin Yang & Jinran Xiong & Taisheng Du & Xiaotang Ju & Yantai Gan & Sien Li & Longlong Xia & Yanjun Shen & Steven Pacenka & Tammo S. Steenhuis & Kadambot H. M. Siddique & Shaozhong Kang & Klaus But, 2024. "Diversifying crop rotation increases food production, reduces net greenhouse gas emissions and improves soil health," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Shaofeng Yuan & Congmou Zhu & Lixia Yang & Fenghua Xie, 2019. "Responses of Ecosystem Services to Urbanization-Induced Land Use Changes in Ecologically Sensitive Suburban Areas in Hangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, March.
    13. Weiwei Wang & Lihua Zhou & Guojing Yang & Yan Sun & Yong Chen, 2019. "Prohibited Grazing Policy Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction in Rural Northwest China—A Case Study in Yanchi County, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Jiang, Wei, 2017. "Ecosystem services research in China: A critical review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PA), pages 10-16.
    15. Wusheng Zhao & Peiji Shi & Ya Wan & Yan Yao, 2023. "Coupling and Coordination Relationship between Urbanization Quality and Ecosystem Services in the Upper Yellow River: A Case Study of the Lanzhou–Xining Urban Agglomeration, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Yongqi Chen & Wei Liu & Fen Zhao & Qing Zhao & Zhiwei Xu & Michael Asiedu Kumi, 2024. "Multi-Scale Analysis of Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs/Synergies in the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, September.
    17. Xinhai Lu & Bin Jiang & Mingqing Liu & Yuying Li & Danling Chen, 2022. "A Study on the Gains and Losses of the Ecosystem Service Value of the Land Consolidation Projects of Different Properties in Hubei Province: An Empirical Comparison Based on Plains, Mountains and Hill," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, July.
    18. Meyar-Naimi, H. & Vaez-Zadeh, S., 2012. "Developing a DSR-HNS policy making framework for electric energy systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 616-627.
    19. Xuemei Li & Suisui Chen & Shuhong Wang, 2024. "Economic growth, government efficiency, and biodiversity loss: an international trade perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 30901-30927, December.
    20. John Parkins & Richard Stedman & Jeji Varghese, 2001. "Moving towards local-level indicators of sustainability in forest-based communities: A mixed-method approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 43-72, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10993-:d:1544115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.