IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9846-d1518964.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-Economic Analysis of BAU-STR Dryer for Rice Drying: An Approach to Accelerate Adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Md. Hamidul Islam

    (Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Regulations, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, Pine Bluff, AR 71601, USA
    Department of Farm Power and Machinery, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh)

  • Abdul Momin

    (Agricultural Engineering Technology, School of Agriculture, Tennessee Tech University, Cooksville, TN 38505, USA)

  • Chayan Kumer Saha

    (Department of Farm Power and Machinery, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Monjurul Alam

    (Department of Farm Power and Machinery, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh)

  • Shahidul Islam

    (Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Regulations, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, Pine Bluff, AR 71601, USA)

Abstract

Postharvest food loss and waste offset worldwide agricultural productivity and food security. Insufficient drying and storage are the prominent drivers of food loss and waste in underdeveloped countries. Mechanical grain drying systems have distinct benefits over sun drying but are inaccessible to underserved communities due to high capital costs and energy demand. This study evaluated the techno-economic and financial performance of a half-ton-capacity BAU-STR dryer. The moisture extraction rate, drying rate, drying efficiency, and energy consumption were used as technical performance indicators. In contrast, the net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), benefit–cost ratio (BCR), and payback period were considered economic performance indicators. The technical performance analysis results revealed that the moisture content of rice was reduced from 19.5% to 13.5 ± 0.15% in 4.0 h with an average drying rate of 1.5%/h and a drying efficiency of 75.1%. The financial performance analysis resulted in a drying cost, NPV, IRR, BCR, and PBP of USD 0.96 per 100 kg of grain, USD 3018, 135%, 3.0, and 0.73 yr., respectively, when the annual use was 240 h. If the yearly use of the dryer increased from 240 to 720 h, a higher NPV, IRR, and BCR, as well as a lower payback period and drying cost, could be achieved. Adopting a BAU-STR dryer for drying grain (rice and corn) among underserved communities could play a key role in postharvest food loss and waste.

Suggested Citation

  • Md. Hamidul Islam & Abdul Momin & Chayan Kumer Saha & Md. Monjurul Alam & Shahidul Islam, 2024. "Techno-Economic Analysis of BAU-STR Dryer for Rice Drying: An Approach to Accelerate Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9846-:d:1518964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9846/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9846/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheahan, Megan & Barrett, Christopher B., 2017. "Review: Food loss and waste in Sub-Saharan Africa," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-12.
    2. George Obeng-Akrofi & Joseph O. Akowuah & Dirk E. Maier & Ahmad Addo, 2021. "Techno-Economic Analysis of a Crossflow Column Dryer for Maize Drying in Ghana," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elżbieta Goryńska-Goldmann & Michał Gazdecki & Krystyna Rejman & Joanna Kobus-Cisowska & Sylwia Łaba & Robert Łaba, 2020. "How to Prevent Bread Losses in the Baking and Confectionery Industry?—Measurement, Causes, Management and Prevention," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Chegere, Martin Julius, 2018. "Post-harvest losses reduction by small-scale maize farmers: The role of handling practices," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 103-115.
    3. Lateef Olawale Akanni, 2020. "Climatic Variations and Spatial Price Differentials of Perishable Foods in Nigeria," Econometric Research in Finance, SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Çavuşa, Osman & Bayhan, Isa & Ismail, Balarabe B., 2022. "An Overview of the Effect of Covid-19 on Household Food Waste: How Does the Pandemic Affect Food Waste at the Household Level?," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 13(01), January.
    5. Alammar, Ahmed A. & Rezk, Ahmed & Alaswad, Abed & Fernando, Julia & Olabi, A.G. & Decker, Stephanie & Ruhumuliza, Joseph & Gasana, Quénan, 2022. "The technical, economic, and environmental feasibility of a bioheat-driven adsorption cooling system for food cold storing: A case study of Rwanda," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    6. Cattaneo, Andrea & Sánchez, Marco V. & Torero, Máximo & Vos, Rob, 2021. "Reducing food loss and waste: Five challenges for policy and research," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    7. Martin Julius Chegere & Razack Lokina & Agnes G. Mwakaje, 2020. "The impact of hermetic storage bag supply and training on food security in Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(6), pages 1299-1316, December.
    8. Yi Luo & Dong Huang & Haimin Miao & Laping Wu & Junfeng Zhu, 2022. "Impact of advanced storage facilities on households’ maize storage losses and food security in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 221-237, January.
    9. Fides John Izdori & David Mkwambisi & Selma Tuemumunu Karuaihe & Effie Papargyropoulou, 2025. "Multi-stakeholder collaboration framework for post-harvest loss reduction: the case of tomato value chain in Iringa and Morogoro regional in Tanzania," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Chegere, Martin Julius & Eggert, Håkan & Söderbom, Måns, 2019. "The Effects of Storage Technology and Training on Post-Harvest Losses: Evidence from Small-Scale Farms in Tanzania," EfD Discussion Paper 19-10, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    11. Cargele Masso & Joseph Gweyi-Onyango & Hilda Pius Luoga & Martin Yemefack & Bernard Vanlauwe, 2024. "A Review on Nitrogen Flows and Obstacles to Sustainable Nitrogen Management within the Lake Victoria Basin, East Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Patrick Ngwenyama & Shephard Siziba & Loveness K. Nyanga & Tanya E. Stathers & Macdonald Mubayiwa & Shaw Mlambo & Tinashe Nyabako & Aurélie Bechoff & Apurba Shee & Brighton M. Mvumi, 2023. "Determinants of smallholder farmers’ maize grain storage protection practices and understanding of the nutritional aspects of grain postharvest losses," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(4), pages 937-951, August.
    13. Barbara Adolph & Nugun P. Jellason & Jane Musole Kwenye & Jo Davies & Anne Giger Dray & Patrick O. Waeber & Katy Jeary & Phil Franks, 2023. "Exploring Farmers’ Decisions on Agricultural Intensification and Cropland Expansion in Ethiopia, Ghana, and Zambia through Serious Gaming," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    14. Rosalinda Nicastro & Petronia Carillo, 2021. "Food Loss and Waste Prevention Strategies from Farm to Fork," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, May.
    15. Beye, Assane & Komarek, Adam M., "undated". "Quantification and benefits of reducing post-harvest losses: Evidence for vegetables in Senegal," Discussion Papers 305681, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    16. Min, Shi & Wang, Xiaobing & Yu, Xiaohua, 2021. "Does dietary knowledge affect household food waste in the developing economy of China?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    17. Nanyan Hu & Yonghao Hu & Yi Luo & Laping Wu, 2024. "The Effect of High-Standard Farmland Construction Policy on Grain Harvest Losses in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, July.
    18. Xue Qu & Daizo Kojima & Laping Wu & Mitsuyoshi Ando, 2021. "The Losses in the Rice Harvest Process: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-25, August.
    19. Hory Chikez & Dirk Maier & Steve Sonka, 2021. "Mango Postharvest Technologies: An Observational Study of the Yieldwise Initiative in Kenya," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9846-:d:1518964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.