IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i7p1058-d1435567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of High-Standard Farmland Construction Policy on Grain Harvest Losses in China

Author

Listed:
  • Nanyan Hu

    (College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yonghao Hu

    (College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yi Luo

    (Center for Price Cost Investigation, National Development and Reform Commission, Beijing 100045, China)

  • Laping Wu

    (College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

The United Nations included reducing harvest losses as a Sustainable Development Goal in 2015, sparking heightened research and policymaker interest in reducing losses to ensure food security. High-standard farmland construction plays a crucial role in ensuring food security. Few studies have combined high-standard farmland construction with grain harvest losses. Drawing on the data from the 2022 Chinese Post-Harvest Loss Survey (CPHLS 2022), the study utilizes OLS (ordinary least square) and quantile regression models to explore the impact of high-standard farmland construction on grain harvest losses. Empirical results show that high-standard farmland construction can significantly reduce grain harvest losses. The research conclusions are still valid after passing a series of robustness tests. The heterogeneity analysis shows that high-standard farmland construction significantly impacts on grain harvest losses for farmers in major grain-producing areas, plain areas, and eastern regions. Mechanism analysis reveals that high-standard farmland construction mainly reduces grain harvest losses by expanding operational scale and enhancing mechanization application. Based on research findings, the Chinese government should formulate a targeted high-standard farmland construction policy, optimize the agricultural machinery operating environment, and promote appropriate operational scale to ensure national food security.

Suggested Citation

  • Nanyan Hu & Yonghao Hu & Yi Luo & Laping Wu, 2024. "The Effect of High-Standard Farmland Construction Policy on Grain Harvest Losses in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1058-:d:1435567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1058/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1058/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qian, Long & Lu, Hua & Gao, Qiang & Lu, Hualiang, 2022. "Household-owned farm machinery vs. outsourced machinery services: The impact of agricultural mechanization on the land leasing behavior of relatively large-scale farmers in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    2. Gonzalez, X. P. & Alvarez, C. J. & Crecente, R., 2004. "Evaluation of land distributions with joint regard to plot size and shape," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 31-43, October.
    3. Looga, J. & Jürgenson, E. & Sikk, K. & Matveev, E. & Maasikamäe, S., 2018. "Land fragmentation and other determinants of agricultural farm productivity: The case of Estonia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 285-292.
    4. Valtiala, Juho & Niskanen, Olli & Torvinen, Mikael & Riekkinen, Kirsikka & Suokannas, Antti, 2023. "The relationship between agricultural land parcel size and cultivation costs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    5. Lu, Hua & Xie, Hualin & He, Yafen & Wu, Zhilong & Zhang, Xinmin, 2018. "Assessing the impacts of land fragmentation and plot size on yields and costs: A translog production model and cost function approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 81-88.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gatterer, Markus & Leonhardt, Heidi & Salhofer, Klaus & Morawetz, Ulrich, 2024. "The legacy of partible inheritance on farmland fragmentation: Evidence from Austria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    2. Peltonen-Sainio, Pirjo & Jauhiainen, Lauri & Näsi, Roope & Puttonen, Eetu & Honkavaara, Eija, 2024. "Harmonization potential of the fragmented farmlands in Finland: The pros and cons for critical parcel characteristics," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    3. Yang Guo & Meiling Cui & Zhigang Xu, 2023. "Effect of Spatial Characteristics of Farmland Plots on Transfer Patterns in China: A Supply and Demand Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Shichao Yuan & Jian Wang, 2022. "Involution Effect: Does China’s Rural Land Transfer Market Still Have Efficiency?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Heinrichs, J. & Kuhn, T. & Pahmeyer, C. & Britz, W., 2021. "Economic effects of plot sizes and farm-plot distances in organic and conventional farming systems: A farm-level analysis for Germany," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    6. Dongjie Wang & Hao Yang & Yueming Hu & A-Xing Zhu & Xiaoyun Mao, 2022. "Analyzing Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Cultivated Land Fragmentation and Their Influencing Factors in a Rapidly Developing Region: A Case Study in Guangdong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Zhou, Yang & Li, Peixuan & Zhang, Qi & Cheng, Guoqiang, 2025. "Socio-economic impacts, challenges, and strategies for whole-region comprehensive land consolidation in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    8. Janus, Jarosław & Ertunç, Ela, 2021. "Differences in the effectiveness of land consolidation projects in various countries and their causes: Examples of Poland and Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Zang, Liangzhen & Araral, Eduardo & Wang, Yahua, 2019. "Effects of land fragmentation on the governance of the commons: Theory and evidence from 284 villages and 17 provinces in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 518-527.
    10. Xu, Weiyi & Jin, Xiaobin & Liu, Jing & Zhou, Yinkang, 2021. "Analysis of influencing factors of cultivated land fragmentation based on hierarchical linear model: A case study of Jiangsu Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    11. Shukun Wang & Dengwang Li & Tingting Li & Changquan Liu, 2021. "Land Use Transitions and Farm Performance in China: A Perspective of Land Fragmentation," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-22, July.
    12. Ganjar Kurnia & Iwan Setiawan & Ahmad C. Tridakusumah & Gani Jaelani & Mahra A. Heryanto & Adi Nugraha, 2022. "Local Wisdom for Ensuring Agriculture Sustainability: A Case from Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-13, July.
    13. Meng Qu & Kai Zhao & Renhui Zhang & Yuan Gao & Jing Wang, 2022. "Divergence between Willingness and Behavior of Farmers to Purchase Socialized Agricultural Services: From a Heterogeneity Perspective of Land Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Ye, Sijing & Ren, Shuyi & Song, Changqing & Du, Zhenbo & Wang, Kuangxu & Du, Bin & Cheng, Feng & Zhu, Dehai, 2024. "Spatial pattern of cultivated land fragmentation in mainland China: Characteristics, dominant factors, and countermeasures," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    15. Ruining Li & Yanli Yu, 2022. "Impacts of Green Production Behaviors on the Income Effect of Rice Farmers from the Perspective of Outsourcing Services: Evidence from the Rice Region in Northwest China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-27, October.
    16. Chunfang Zhou & Yuluan Zhao & Mingshun Long & Xiubin Li, 2024. "How Does Land Fragmentation Affect Agricultural Technical Efficiency? Based on Mediation Effects Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, February.
    17. Wei, Lai & Luo, Yun & Wang, Miao & Su, Shiliang & Pi, Jianhua & Li, Guie, 2020. "Essential fragmentation metrics for agricultural policies: Linking landscape pattern, ecosystem service and land use management in urbanizing China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    18. Heinrichs, Julia & Kuhn, Till & Pahmeyer, Christoph & Britz, Wolfgang, 2020. "The Differentiated Effects of Plot Sizes and Farm-Field Distances in Organic and Conventional Farming Systems: An Economic Analysis at Farm Level," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305628, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    19. Xianhui Hu & Xiaxia Lin & Gaohui Wen & Yi Zhou & Hao Zhou & Siqi Lin & Dongyang Yue, 2024. "The Impact of Cultivated Land Fragmentation on Farmers’ Ecological Efficiency of Cultivated Land Use Based on the Moderating and Mediating Effects of the Cultivated Land Management Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, October.
    20. Heinrichs, Julia & Kuhn, Till & Pahmeyer, Christoph & Britz, Wolfgang, 2020. "The Differentiated Effects of Plot Sizes and Farm-Field Distances in Organic and Conventional Farming Systems: An Economic Analysis at Farm Level," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305628, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1058-:d:1435567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.