IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p10117-d1524921.html

Port Service Coordination Sustainability in the Yangtze River Delta in China Based on Spatial Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaohua Leng

    (College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
    School of Economics and Management, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Kebiao Yuan

    (School of Economics and Management, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Xiaohong Chen

    (College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

Abstract

With the prevalence of international trade protectionism and transformation and the upgrading of the domestic market structure, the contradiction between the demand for and the competitive development of the port market in the Yangtze River Delta in China has become increasingly prominent. The 19 major ports of the Yangtze River Delta in China were selected for this study, and using the methods of index evaluation, gravitational model, and spatial interpolation, the spatial effects in the hinterland were calculated from three dimensions, central potential, spatial gravity and distribution convenience, and the regional coordination of port services. The results show that the potential of the Shanghai Port and Ningbo Zhoushan Port in China is stronger, and the difference in the distribution of the ports is quite clear. The spatial gravity of each port city can be superimposed over one another to form a clear dense semi-circular zone, and the ability of the marginal ports to participate in this zone is weak. The convenience of their distribution in the hinterland changes from being location-dependent to traffic-dependent. The service gap in the hinterland of the port system is more significant, but the expansion of spatial effects makes the sustainability of regional coordination gradually improve. Finally, several policy suggestions are proposed to ensure ecological responsibility among resource-oriented enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaohua Leng & Kebiao Yuan & Xiaohong Chen, 2024. "Port Service Coordination Sustainability in the Yangtze River Delta in China Based on Spatial Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-11, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:10117-:d:1524921
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/10117/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/10117/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alfred J. Baird, 1997. "Extending the lifecycle of container mainports in upstream urban locations," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 299-301, January.
    2. Kevin Cullinane & Yahui Teng & Teng-Fei Wang, 2005. "Port competition between Shanghai and Ningbo," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 331-346, October.
    3. Jari Salo & Helen Cripps & Robert Wendelin, 2020. "Developing cross-selling capability in key corporate bank relationships: the case of a Nordic Bank," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(3), pages 45-52, December.
    4. Saeed, Naima & Larsen, Odd I., 2010. "An application of cooperative game among container terminals of one port," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 393-403, June.
    5. Zhao, Deng & Zhen-fu, Li & Yu-tao, Zhou & Xiao, Chen & Shan-shan, Liang, 2020. "Measurement and spatial spillover effects of port comprehensive strength: Empirical evidence from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 288-298.
    6. repec:bla:ausecr:v:40:y:2007:i:3:p:267-278 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Shiyuan & Luo, Meifeng, 2021. "Competition or cooperation? Ports’ strategies and welfare analysis facing shipping alliances," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    2. Shiyuan Zheng & Rudy R. Negenborn, 2017. "Terminal investment timing decisions in a competitive setting with uncertainty using a real option approach," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 392-411, April.
    3. Yuan, Kebiao & Wang, Xuefeng, 2024. "Research on evolutionary game and stability of port cooperation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 97-109.
    4. Mingzhu Yu & Chung-Yee Lee & James Jixian Wang, 2017. "The regional port competition with different terminal competition intensity," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 659-688, December.
    5. Zihua Liu & Dong Yang & Y. N. Eppie Ng, 2020. "A competitive analysis of port of Hong Kong: from external to internal," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Song, Dong-Ping & Lyons, Andrew & Li, Dong & Sharifi, Hossein, 2016. "Modeling port competition from a transport chain perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 75-96.
    7. Luo, Meifeng & Chen, Fuying & Zhang, Jiantong, 2022. "Relationships among port competition, cooperation and competitiveness: A literature review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-9.
    8. Kavirathna, Chathumi Ayanthi & Kawasaki, Tomoya & Hanaoka, Shinya & Bandara, Yapa Mahinda, 2020. "Cooperation with a vessel transfer policy for coopetition among container terminals in a single port," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 1-12.
    9. Yoon, Junghyun & Lee, Hee Yong & Dinwoodie, John, 2015. "Competitiveness of container terminal operating companies in South Korea and the industry–university–government network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-14.
    10. Lyu, Xiaohuan & Lalla-Ruiz, Eduardo & Schulte, Frederik, 2025. "The collaborative berth allocation problem with row-generation algorithms for stable cost allocations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(3), pages 888-906.
    11. Wang, Yuhong & Cullinane, Kevin, 2014. "Traffic consolidation in East Asian container ports: A network flow analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 152-163.
    12. Jung-In Yeon & Sojung Hwang & Bogang Jun, 2022. "The spillover effect of neighboring port on regional industrial diversification and regional economic resilience," Papers 2204.00189, arXiv.org.
    13. Feng, Hongxiang & Grifoll, Manel & Zheng, Pengjun, 2019. "From a feeder port to a hub port: The evolution pathways, dynamics and perspectives of Ningbo-Zhoushan port (China)," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 21-35.
    14. Gang Dong & Dandan Zhong, 2019. "Tacit Collusion of Pricing Strategy Game between Regional Ports: The Case of Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Feng, Hongxiang & Grifoll, Manel & Yang, Zhongzhen & Zheng, Pengjun & Martin-Mallofre, Agustí, 2020. "Visualization of container throughput evolution of the Yangtze River Delta multi-port system: the ternary diagram method," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    16. Samy Mansouri, 2021. "Business cycles influences upon customer cross-buying behavior in the case of financial services," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(3), pages 181-201, September.
    17. Chengjin Wang & César Ducruet, 2013. "Regional Resilience and Spatial Cycles: Long-Term Evolution of the Chinese Port System (221bc–2010ad)," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 104(5), pages 521-538, December.
    18. Song, Zhuzhu & Tang, Wansheng & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2018. "Cooperation mode for a liner company with heterogeneous ports: Business cooperation vs. port investment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 513-533.
    19. (Kevin) Park, Hyosoo & Chang, Young-Tae & Zou, Bo, 2018. "Emission control under private port operator duopoly," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 40-65.
    20. Dong, Gang & Zheng, Shiyuan & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2018. "The effects of regional port integration: The case of Ningbo-Zhoushan Port," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 1-15.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:10117-:d:1524921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.