IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p10116-d1524957.html

Policy Recommendations to Enhance Small-to-Medium-Sized Enterprise Support for Achieving the UK’s Net Zero Targets

Author

Listed:
  • Fatemeh Khosravi

    (Sustainability Research Institute, University of East London, Docklands Campus, London E16 2RD, UK)

  • Sam Jelliman

    (Sustainability Research Institute, University of East London, Docklands Campus, London E16 2RD, UK)

  • Chidinma Uchendu

    (Sustainability Research Institute, University of East London, Docklands Campus, London E16 2RD, UK)

  • Hebba Haddad

    (Sustainability Research Institute, University of East London, Docklands Campus, London E16 2RD, UK)

  • Alan Chandler

    (Sustainability Research Institute, University of East London, Docklands Campus, London E16 2RD, UK)

  • Stuart Connop

    (Sustainability Research Institute, University of East London, Docklands Campus, London E16 2RD, UK)

Abstract

In the UK, SMEs account for 99.9% of the business population, with from 43% to 53% of UK business emissions coming from SMEs. However, SMEs face specific barriers in relation to net zero targets, such as a lack of knowledge about strategies to achieve net zero targets. Despite the ongoing lack of a formal decarbonisation plan for SMEs, various types of projects have been designed to help SMEs to move towards the UK’s net zero target. The Eastern New Energy (ENE) project received funding from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) to support SMEs across significant economic areas of the UK, namely the East of England, to help address the barriers that prevent SMEs from decarbonising. The project provided a range of measures, including raising their level of knowledge and providing technical support to help with SME decarbonisation. Following the completion of our targeted support activities, semi-structured interviews ( n = 21) were conducted with SME beneficiaries to evaluate the effectiveness of the support with the ambition of providing some policy recommendations based on understanding how national and strategic support can be effective for a diverse, often unconnected ecosystem of businesses. The findings from the interviews indicated that engagement in the ENE project had positive impacts on the SMEs’ understanding of net zero, or how to start their journey towards decarbonisation by identifying their source of emissions and learning how to calculate them. However, accounting for emissions from Scope 3 activities, transition costs and building restrictions were the main barriers that undermined the ENE recommendations. Our research concludes that in designing engagement projects and support, one needs to acknowledge such restrictions and barriers, which requires government interventions to cover all aspects of the SME decarbonisation journey, from nuanced and responsive policy making to developing bespoke knowledge transfer and supporting low-carbon material provision that can support a decarbonised marketplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatemeh Khosravi & Sam Jelliman & Chidinma Uchendu & Hebba Haddad & Alan Chandler & Stuart Connop, 2024. "Policy Recommendations to Enhance Small-to-Medium-Sized Enterprise Support for Achieving the UK’s Net Zero Targets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:10116-:d:1524957
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/10116/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/10116/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tolu Olarewaju & Samir Dani & Abdul Jabbar, 2023. "A Comprehensive Model for Developing SME Net Zero Capability Incorporating Grey Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Jaryn Bradford & Evan D. G. Fraser, 2008. "Local authorities, climate change and small and medium enterprises: identifying effective policy instruments to reduce energy use and carbon emissions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 156-172, May.
    3. Fawcett, Tina & Hampton, Sam, 2020. "Why & how energy efficiency policy should address SMEs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malewska, Kamila & Cyfert, Szymon & Chwiłkowska-Kubala, Anna & Mierzejewska, Katrzyna & Szumowski, Witold, 2024. "The missing link between digital transformation and business model innovation in energy SMEs: The role of digital organisational culture," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    2. G Capece & F Di Pillo & M Gastaldi & N Levialdi & M Miliacca, 2017. "Examining the effect of managing GHG emissions on business performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1041-1060, December.
    3. Pouria Ataei & Vahid Aliabadi & Arash Norouzi & Hassan Sadighi, 2019. "Measuring the employees’ environmental attitude of agricultural knowledge-based companies based on sociocultural components: a case study from Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 2341-2354, October.
    4. Daniela Artemisa Calu & Adriana Ana Maria Davidescu & Alina Mihaela Irimescu & Corina-Graziella Batca Dumitru & Viorel Avram, 2023. "Implementation of Energy Efficiency Improvement Measures in Romania and the Role of Professional Accountants," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(63), pages 479-479, April.
    5. Konstantinos Evangelinos & Ioannis Nikolaou & Walter Leal Filho, 2015. "The Effects of Climate Change Policy on the Business Community: A Corporate Environmental Accounting Perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(5), pages 257-270, September.
    6. Li, Shengnan & Zheng, Xinya & Liao, Jing & Niu, Jianbo, 2024. "Low-carbon city pilot policy and corporate environmental performance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA), pages 1248-1266.
    7. Junqi Wen & Yong Lan & Guoqin Bu, 2024. "Do Innovation and Entrepreneurship Support Policies Promote Urban Green Transformation?—The Mediating Role of Fiscal Technology Expenditure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-24, March.
    8. Jacob Hörisch & Matthew P. Johnson & Stefan Schaltegger, 2015. "Implementation of Sustainability Management and Company Size: A Knowledge‐Based View," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(8), pages 765-779, December.
    9. Werner König & Sabine Löbbe & Stefan Büttner & Christian Schneider, 2020. "Establishing Energy Efficiency—Drivers for Energy Efficiency in German Manufacturing Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-31, October.
    10. Khojastehpour, Morteza & Shams, S.M. Riad, 2020. "Addressing the complexity of stakeholder management in international ecological setting: A CSR approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 302-309.
    11. Tueske, Annamaria & Lasheras Sancho, Marta, 2026. "Catalysing corporate energy efficiency investment: Financial and regulatory factors," EIB Working Papers 2026/03, European Investment Bank (EIB).
    12. Shichun Du & Jing Liu & Zetian Fu, 2021. "The Impact of Village Rules and Formal Environmental Regulations on Farmers’ Cleaner Production Behavior: New Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-20, July.
    13. Dura Codruta Cornelia, 2024. "Determinants Of Smes’ Sustainable Development: A Systematic Literature Review," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 91-101, December.
    14. Chege, Samwel Macharia & Wang, Daoping, 2020. "The influence of technology innovation on SME performance through environmental sustainability practices in Kenya," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    15. Sun, Bohan & Gao, Ke & Liu, Shuai & Wei, Qiaoqiao & Wang, Hui, 2023. "Assessing the performance and economic viability of solar home systems: A way forward towards clean energy exploration and consumption," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 409-419.
    16. Ebiyon Idundun & Andrew S. Hursthouse & Iain McLellan, 2021. "Carbon Management in UK Higher Education Institutions: An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, September.
    17. Shafique Ur Rehman & Stefano Bresciani & Dorra Yahiaoui & Elisa Giacosa, 2022. "Environmental sustainability orientation and corporate social responsibility influence on environmental performance of small and medium enterprises: The mediating effect of green capability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 1954-1967, November.
    18. Yevhen Baranchenko & David Oglethorpe, 2012. "The Potential Environmental Benefits of Co‐Operative Businesses Within the Climate Change Agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 197-210, March.
    19. Margaret Brunton & Gabriel Eweje & Nazim Taskin, 2017. "Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility to Internal Stakeholders: Walking the Walk or Just Talking the Talk?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 31-48, January.
    20. Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto & Esposito, Emilio & Passaro, Renato & Shashi,, 2021. "Determinants of the transition towards circular economy in SMEs: A sustainable supply chain management perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:10116-:d:1524957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.