IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i21p9183-d1504548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smart Logistics Facing Industry 5.0: Research on Key Enablers and Strategic Roadmap

Author

Listed:
  • Chih-Hung Hsu

    (College of Transportation, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350118, China)

  • Xue-Qing Cai

    (College of Transportation, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350118, China)

  • Ting-Yi Zhang

    (Institute of Industrial Engineering, College of Management, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350118, China)

  • Yu-Ling Ji

    (Institute of Industrial Engineering, College of Management, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350118, China)

Abstract

While Industry 4.0 has played a significant role in advancing smart logistics, it has yet to provide adequate solutions for widespread concerns such as human centricity, sustainability, and resilience. The emergence of Industry 5.0 addresses and complements these shortcomings of Industry 4.0. However, there is currently a notable gap in the research regarding how Industry 5.0 can drive the transformation of smart logistics. To address this gap, this study develops a strategic roadmap that offers a solution to this issue. The research is initiated by conducting a comprehensive literature review with a focus on content, identifying 13 key enablers crucial for realizing smart logistics in Industry 5.0. Subsequently, this study establishes the hierarchical relationship among these key enablers through the application of the Fuzzy Interpretative Structural Model (FISM). Following this, the study employs the Matrices Impacts Croises-Multiplication Appliance Classement (MICMAC) to compute the driving force and dependence of each enabler. The results underscore the significant roles of “Active support from the government” and “Human-centric manufacturing and logistics” as the most critical enablers for Industry 5.0. The strategic roadmap, informed by expert opinions, provides valuable insights for policymakers and implementers while explaining the methods and strategies needed to drive Industry 5.0 transformation in smart logistics. Furthermore, it determines the impact relationship between enablers and the optimal development order, facilitating their synergistic alignment. Ultimately, this strategic roadmap serves as an actionable guide for the logistics industry, steering it toward achieving smart logistics and fortifying competitiveness in the industry 5.0 era.

Suggested Citation

  • Chih-Hung Hsu & Xue-Qing Cai & Ting-Yi Zhang & Yu-Ling Ji, 2024. "Smart Logistics Facing Industry 5.0: Research on Key Enablers and Strategic Roadmap," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9183-:d:1504548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9183/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9183/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qian Zhang & Yuming Chen & Wanlong Lin & Yao Chen & Tingsong Wang, 2021. "Optimizing Medical Enterprise’s Operations Management considering Corporate Social Responsibility under Industry 5.0," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-13, November.
    2. Mani, Venkatesh & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta & Mani, Kavitha T.N., 2020. "Supply chain social sustainability in small and medium manufacturing enterprises and firms’ performance: Empirical evidence from an emerging Asian economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    3. Sergey Evgenievich Barykin & Anna Viktorovna Strimovskaya & Sergey Mikhailovich Sergeev & Larisa Nikolaevna Borisoglebskaya & Natalia Dedyukhina & Igor Sklyarov & Julia Sklyarova & Lilya Saychenko, 2023. "Smart City Logistics on the Basis of Digital Tools for ESG Goals Achievement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adrian PETRE, 2025. "Innovative And Sustainable Entrepreneurship Based On Industry 5.0. Expected Best Practices, Insights, And Pathways," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(5), pages 38-47, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenming Liu & Jingjing Li, 2025. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Knowledge Dynamics in Rural Tourism Supply Chains: Challenges, Innovations, and Cross-Sector Applications," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 6732-6764, June.
    2. Abdullah Yıldızbaşı & Cihat Öztürk & Deniz Efendioğlu & Serol Bulkan, 2021. "Assessing the social sustainable supply chain indicators using an integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods: a case study of Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4285-4320, March.
    3. Jamshed Raza & Yuxin Liu & Jianwei Zhang & Nan Zhu & Zohaib Hassan & Habib Gul & Sikander Hussain, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Management Practices and Sustainability Performance: The Dynamic Capability Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    4. R. Rajesh, 2023. "Grey Markov Models for Predicting the Social Sustainability Performances of Firms," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 297-351, August.
    5. Moreno-Miranda, Carlos & Dries, Liesbeth, 2022. "Integrating coordination mechanisms in the sustainability assessment of agri-food chains: From a structured literature review to a comprehensive framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    6. Adelaide Martins & Manuel Castelo Branco & Pedro Novo Melo & Carolina Machado, 2022. "Sustainability in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, May.
    7. Simone Sehnem & Ana Cláudia Lara & Karen Benetti & Kurt Schneider & Maiara Lais Marcon & Tiago Hilário Hennemann Silva, 2024. "Improving startups through excellence initiatives: addressing circular economy and innovation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 15237-15283, June.
    8. Ahmed Abdelkhalek Elseoufy & Pro. Dr. Sally Kamel Ali Omran, 2025. "The Impact of the Organizational DNA on Social Sustainability Performance through Green Training as a Mediating Variable: A Study on the Private Steel Industrial Companies in Egypt," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 12(10), pages 3635-3645, October.
    9. Michael Christofi & Huda Khan & Lea Iaia, 2024. "Responsible innovation in Asia: A systematic review and an agenda for future research," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 1085-1127, September.
    10. Sharfuddin Ahmed Khan & Muhammad Shujaat Mubarik & Simonov Kusi‐Sarpong & Syed Imran Zaman & Syed Hasnain Alam Kazmi, 2021. "Social sustainable supply chains in the food industry: A perspective of an emerging economy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 404-418, January.
    11. Stekelorum, Rebecca & Laguir, Issam & ElBaz, Jamal, 2020. "Can you hear the Eco? From SME environmental responsibility to social requirements in the supply chain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    12. Qin Zhu & Haijing Yu & Zhimei Wan, 2024. "Can digital economy promote urban export sophistication? Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Kumari, Alka & Singh, Manvendra Pratap, 2023. "A journey of social sustainability in organization during MDG & SDG period: A bibliometric analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    14. Sarkar, Biswajit & Sarkar, Mitali & Ganguly, Baishakhi & Cárdenas-Barrón, Leopoldo Eduardo, 2021. "Combined effects of carbon emission and production quality improvement for fixed lifetime products in a sustainable supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    15. Lara Bartocci Liboni & Luciana Oranges Cezarino & Marlon Fernandes Rodrigues Alves & Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour & V. G. Venkatesh, 2023. "Translating the environmental orientation of firms into sustainable outcomes: the role of sustainable dynamic capability," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1125-1146, May.
    16. Minjing Zhu & Lei Zhu, 2025. "Digital economy and coal consumption in emerging Asian economies," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    17. Huma Jamshaid & Muhammad Nauman Abbasi & Raza Ali, 2024. "Sustainability Amplified: Servitization, Integration and Buyer-Supplier Nexus," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(1), pages 297-306.
    18. Zahoor, Nadia & Adomako, Samuel, 2023. "Be open to failure: Open innovation failure in dynamic environments," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    19. Dong, Yao & Xia, Yuhuan & Qi, Xin, 2025. "Technology yields spoils: The impact of digitalization on innovation value appropriation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    20. Sheng, Margaret L. & Saide, Saide, 2021. "Supply chain survivability in crisis times through a viable system perspective: Big data, knowledge ambidexterity, and the mediating role of virtual enterprise," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 567-578.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9183-:d:1504548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.