IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8822-d1496923.html

Comparison of Trends in Sustainable Energy Development in the Czech Republic and Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Konrad Żak

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences, John Paul II University in Biala Podlaska, 21-500 Biala Podlaska, Poland)

  • Mariusz Pyra

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences, John Paul II University in Biala Podlaska, 21-500 Biala Podlaska, Poland)

Abstract

The contemporary process of economic development necessitates a heightened focus on matters of sustainability, with a particular emphasis on sustainable energy policy. This is of paramount importance for the protection of the natural environment and the achievement of long-term economic growth. In the context of countries such as the Czech Republic and Poland, which have historically relied on high-carbon energy sources, the transition to a more sustainable energy system represents a significant challenge. The objective of this paper is to undertake a comparative analysis of the trends in energy sustainability in the Czech Republic and Poland from 2017 to 2021, with a particular focus on key performance indicators. The analysis, based on data from the OECD database, revealed notable discrepancies in the rate of change between the two countries, with Poland exhibiting a more pronounced surge in the proportion of renewable energy sources (RES). A Student’s t -test confirmed the existence of statistically significant differences in key indicators between the Czech Republic and Poland, thereby underscoring the diverse challenges that both countries encounter in their pursuit of sustainable energy development. The Granger causality test was employed to ascertain whether variables exhibit temporal relationships that may suggest potential correlations. However, it is important to note that this test does not prove direct causality, but rather indicates that the variables are related at a specific point in time. Interpretation of the results must be undertaken with caution, as the test does not account for the full complexity of relationships between variables, including external factors and structural changes in the economy. Meanwhile, the LMDI decomposition analysis identified the principal drivers of alterations in CO 2 emissions. The findings indicate that, despite advancements in sustainable energy development, Poland and the Czech Republic are confronted with distinctive challenges that necessitate the implementation of tailored policy responses. It is therefore recommended that further investment in renewable energy and the modernisation of energy infrastructure be made in order to achieve long-term sustainability goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Konrad Żak & Mariusz Pyra, 2024. "Comparison of Trends in Sustainable Energy Development in the Czech Republic and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8822-:d:1496923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8822/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8822/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Śmiech, Sławomir & Papież, Monika, 2014. "Energy consumption and economic growth in the light of meeting the targets of energy policy in the EU: The bootstrap panel Granger causality approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 118-129.
    2. Chen, Huangxin & Shi, Yi & Zhao, Xin, 2022. "Investment in renewable energy resources, sustainable financial inclusion and energy efficiency: A case of US economy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Stamatios Ntanos & Michalis Skordoulis & Grigorios Kyriakopoulos & Garyfallos Arabatzis & Miltiadis Chalikias & Spyros Galatsidas & Athanasios Batzios & Apostolia Katsarou, 2018. "Renewable Energy and Economic Growth: Evidence from European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Raymondo Sandra Marcelline Tsimisaraka & Li Xiang & Andriandafiarisoa Ralison Ny Avotra Andrianarivo & Eric Zonia Josoa & Noheed Khan & Muhammad Shehzad Hanif & Aitzaz Khurshid & Ricardo Limongi, 2023. "Impact of Financial Inclusion, Globalization, Renewable Energy, ICT, and Economic Growth on CO 2 Emission in OBOR Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    5. William D. Nordhaus, 2007. "A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 45(3), pages 686-702, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agnieszka Gałecka & Mariusz Pyra, 2024. "Changes in the Global Structure of Energy Consumption and the Energy Transition Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bartłomiej Bajan & Joanna Łukasiewicz & Aldona Mrówczyńska-Kamińska, 2021. "Energy Consumption and Its Structures in Food Production Systems of the Visegrad Group Countries Compared with EU-15 Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.
    2. De Juan Fernández, Aránzazu & Poncela, Pilar & Rodríguez Caballero, Carlos Vladimir & Ruiz Ortega, Esther, 2022. "Economic activity and climate change," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 35044, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    3. Stéphane Hallegatte, 2008. "A Proposal for a New Prescriptive Discounting Scheme: The Intergenerational Discount Rate," Working Papers 2008.47, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    4. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. & Botzen, W.J.W., 2015. "Monetary valuation of the social cost of CO2 emissions: A critical survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 33-46.
    5. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Hoang, Thi Hong Van & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar & Roubaud, David, 2017. "Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: New evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 199-212.
    6. Ismael Pérez-Franco & Agustín García-García & Juan J. Maldonado-Briegas, 2020. "Energy Transition Towards a Greener and More Competitive Economy: The Iberian Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Dong-Xuan, Bach & Qu, Xiangyu, 2025. "Restricted dominant unanimity and social discounting," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    8. Pycroft, Jonathan & Vergano, Lucia & Hope, Chris & Paci, Daniele & Ciscar, Juan Carlos, 2011. "A tale of tails: Uncertainty and the social cost of carbon dioxide," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy, vol. 5, pages 1-29.
    9. Mononen, Lasse, 2024. "Dynamically Consistent Intergenerational Welfare," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 687, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    10. Min Gong & David Krantz & Elke Weber, 2014. "Why Chinese discount future financial and environmental gains but not losses more than Americans," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 103-124, October.
    11. Söderholm, Patrik & Pettersson, Fredrik, 2008. "Climate policy and the social cost of power generation: Impacts of the Swedish national emissions target," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 4154-4158, November.
    12. Marius Dalian Doran & Maria Magdalena Poenaru & Alexandra Lucia Zaharia & Sorana Vătavu & Oana Ramona Lobonț, 2022. "Fiscal Policy, Growth, Financial Development and Renewable Energy in Romania: An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model with Evidence for Growth Hypothesis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Małgorzata Sztorc, 2022. "The Implementation of the European Green Deal Strategy as a Challenge for Energy Management in the Face of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, April.
    14. Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Singh, Sanjeet & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Apostu, Simona-Andreea & Bansal, Pooja, 2023. "Overcoming the shock of energy depletion for energy policy? Tracing the missing link between energy depletion, renewable energy development and decarbonization in the USA," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    15. Belqasem Aljafari & Jasmin Pamela Stephenraj & Indragandhi Vairavasundaram & Raja Singh Rassiah, 2022. "Steady State Modeling and Performance Analysis of a Wind Turbine-Based Doubly Fed Induction Generator System with Rotor Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, May.
    16. Wei Wang & Leonid Melnyk & Oleksandra Kubatko & Bohdan Kovalov & Luc Hens, 2023. "Economic and Technological Efficiency of Renewable Energy Technologies Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    17. Mercy Berman DeMenno, 2023. "Environmental sustainability and financial stability: can macroprudential stress testing measure and mitigate climate-related systemic financial risk?," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(4), pages 445-473, December.
    18. Mara Madaleno & Manuel Carlos Nogueira, 2023. "How Renewable Energy and CO 2 Emissions Contribute to Economic Growth, and Sustainability—An Extensive Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
    19. Grimaud, André & Lafforgue, Gilles & Magné, Bertrand, 2011. "Climate change mitigation options and directed technical change: A decentralized equilibrium analysis," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 938-962.
    20. Deegen, Peter & Matolepszy, Kai, 2015. "Economic balancing of forest management under storm risk, the case of the Ore Mountains (Germany)," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 1-13.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8822-:d:1496923. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.