IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8761-d1495869.html

Optimal Site Selection for Solar PV Systems in the Colombian Caribbean: Evaluating Weighting Methods in a TOPSIS Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Robles-Algarín

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta 470003, Colombia)

  • Luis Castrillo-Fernández

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta 470003, Colombia)

  • Diego Restrepo-Leal

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Santa Marta 470002, Colombia)

Abstract

This research paper proposes a framework utilizing multicriteria tools for optimal site selection of photovoltaic solar farms. A comparative analysis was conducted using three quantitative methods—CRITIC (criteria importance through intercriteria correlation), PCA (principal component analysis), and entropy—to obtain the weights for the selection process. The evaluation considered environmental, demographic, financial, meteorological, and performance system criteria. TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) was employed to rank the alternatives based on their proximity to the ideal positive solution and distance from the ideal negative solution. The capital cities of the seven departments in the Colombian Caribbean region were selected for the assessment, characterized by high annual solar radiation, to evaluate the suitability of the proposed decision-making framework. The results demonstrated that Barranquilla consistently ranked in the top two across all methods, indicating its strong performance. Cartagena, for instance, fluctuated between first and third place, showing some stability but still influenced by the method used. In contrast, Sincelejo consistently ranked among the lowest positions. A sensitivity analysis with equal weight distribution confirmed the top-performing cities, though it also highlighted that the weight assignment method impacted the final rankings. Choosing the appropriate method for weight calculation depended on factors such as the diversity and interdependence of criteria, the availability of reliable data, and the desired sensitivity of the results. For instance, CRITIC captured inter-criteria correlation, while PCA focused on reducing dimensionality, and entropy emphasized the variability of information.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Robles-Algarín & Luis Castrillo-Fernández & Diego Restrepo-Leal, 2024. "Optimal Site Selection for Solar PV Systems in the Colombian Caribbean: Evaluating Weighting Methods in a TOPSIS Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8761-:d:1495869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8761/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8761/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juan Jose Cabello Eras & Milen Balbis Morej n & Alexis Sagastume Guti rrez & Aldo Pardo Garc a & Mario Cabello Ulloa & Francisco Javier Rey Mart nez & Juan Gabriel Rueda-Bayona, 2019. "A look to the Electricity Generation from Non-Conventional Renewable Energy Sources in Colombia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(1), pages 15-25.
    2. Syed Hammad Mian & Khaja Moiduddin & Hisham Alkhalefah & Mustufa Haider Abidi & Faraz Ahmed & Faraz Hussain Hashmi, 2023. "Mechanisms for Choosing PV Locations That Allow for the Most Sustainable Usage of Solar Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Christian Manuel Moreno Rocha & Jose Ricardo Nunez Alvarez & Daniel A. Diaz Castillo & Esnaider D. Florian Domingue & Juan Camilo Barrera Hernandez, 2022. "Implementation of the Hierarchical Analytical Process in the Selection of the Best Source of Renewable Energy in the Colombian Caribbean Region," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(2), pages 111-119, March.
    4. Yılmaz, Kutay & Dinçer, Ali Ersin & Ayhan, Elif N., 2023. "Exploring flood and erosion risk indices for optimal solar PV site selection and assessing the influence of topographic resolution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    5. Noorollahi, Younes & Ghenaatpisheh Senani, Ali & Fadaei, Ahmad & Simaee, Mobina & Moltames, Rahim, 2022. "A framework for GIS-based site selection and technical potential evaluation of PV solar farm using Fuzzy-Boolean logic and AHP multi-criteria decision-making approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 89-104.
    6. Sultan Al-Shammari & Wonsuk Ko & Essam A. Al Ammar & Majed A. Alotaibi & Hyeong-Jin Choi, 2021. "Optimal Decision-Making in Photovoltaic System Selection in Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, January.
    7. Imad Hassan & Ibrahim Alhamrouni & Nurul Hanis Azhan, 2023. "A CRITIC–TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Optimum Site Selection for Solar PV Farm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-26, May.
    8. Ayough, Ashkan & Boshruei, Setareh & Khorshidvand, Behrooz, 2022. "A new interactive method based on multi-criteria preference degree functions for solar power plant site selection," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1165-1173.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ezgi Güler & Süheyla Yerel Kandemir, 2025. "Assessment of Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development Countries Based on Agricultural Performance Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-25, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krishankumar, Raghunathan & Sundararajan, Dhruva & Ishizaka, Alessio & Ravichandran, Kattur Soundarapandian, 2025. "A double hierarchy fuzzy decision approach for solar farm ranking sites in India," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Andrius Tamošiūnas, 2023. "Selecting Rooftop Solar Photovoltaic Modules by Measuring Their Attractiveness by a Categorical-Based Evaluation Technique (MACBETH): The Case of Lithuania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Haspolat, Emre & Cicek, Doga Derman & Gokmener, Serkan & Melek, Abiddin Berhan & Deveci, Muhammet & Oguz, Elif, 2024. "Site selection of floating photovoltaic systems on hydropower reservoirs using fuzzy sine trigonometric decision-making model: Turkey as a case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    4. Feng, Xiaofan & Zhang, Zhengjia & Chen, Qi & Guo, Zhiling & Zhang, Haoran & Wang, Mengmeng & Gao, Wei & Liu, Xiuguo, 2025. "Integrating remote sensing, GIS, and multi-criteria decision making for assessing PV potential in mountainous regions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    5. Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Shahabaddin & Firoozabadi, Bahar, 2023. "A novel four-stage integrated GIS based fuzzy SWARA approach for solar site suitability with hydrogen storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    6. José Eduardo Tafula & Constantino Dário Justo & Pedro Moura & Jérôme Mendes & Ana Soares, 2023. "Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach for Optimum Site Selection for Off-Grid Solar Photovoltaic Microgrids in Mozambique," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-41, March.
    7. Gumber, Anurag & Zana, Riccardo & Steffen, Bjarne, 2024. "A global analysis of renewable energy project commissioning timelines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    8. Tomislav Sunko & Marko Mladineo & Mirjana Kovačić & Toni Mišković, 2024. "Multi-Criteria Analysis of Coast Guard Resource Deployment for Improvement of Maritime Safety and Environmental Protection: Case Study of Eastern Adriatic Sea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Hou, Yali & Wang, Qunwei & Tan, Tao, 2023. "An ensemble learning framework for rooftop photovoltaic project site selection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    10. Michel Dur n Contreras & Rodrigo Sequeda Barros & Jorlany Zapata & Marley Vanegas Chamorro & Alberto Albis Arrieta, 2020. "A Look to the Biogas Generation from Organic Wastes in Colombia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 248-254.
    11. De Cos, Olga & Charbonneau, Marion & Puyo, Jean-Yves & Tran, Thao & Montagne, Delphine, 2025. "GIS multi-threat models for agricultural land in the Nouvelle-Aquitaine region (France). A methodology of composite indicators to support targeted policies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    12. Xiao, Sheng & Ren, He & Zhao, Yanling & He, Tingting & Huang, Chunlin & Chen, Qixiang & Zhang, Lifan & An, Yifan & Li, Fashuai & Chen, Yuwei, 2025. "Land reuse for carbon mitigation: Decarbonization potential of solar photovoltaics in China's open-pit mining areas," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    13. Wei Ding & Xuguang Zhao & Weigao Meng & Haichao Wang, 2022. "Smart Evaluation of Sustainability of Photovoltaic Projects in the Context of Carbon Neutrality Target," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Shasha Chai & Fanjie Kong & Yu Liu & Mengyin Liang & Quanfeng Liu, 2024. "Photovoltaic Solar Farms Site Selection through “Policy Constraints–Construction Suitability”: A Case Study of Qilian County, Qinghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Yang Li & Jingjing Pei & Fang Zhang, 2023. "Comprehensive Ecological Planning and Evaluation of Towns from the Perspective of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Tao, Linwei & Hayashi, Kiichiro & Gyeltshen, Sangay & Shimoyama, Yuya, 2025. "Spatial assessment of utility-scale solar photovoltaic siting potential using machine learning approaches: A case study in Aichi prefecture, Japan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 383(C).
    17. Yang, Hua & Xu, Yong & Zhou, Kan & Li, Jiuyi, 2024. "Mapping development potential and priority zones for utility-scale photovoltaic on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PA).
    18. Yılmaz, Kutay & Dinçer, Ali Ersin & Ayhan, Elif N., 2023. "Exploring flood and erosion risk indices for optimal solar PV site selection and assessing the influence of topographic resolution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    19. Yilmaz, İsmail & Kocer, Abdulkadir & Aksoy, Ercument, 2024. "Site selection for solar power plants using GIS and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: Case study of the western mediterranean region of Turkiye," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PC).
    20. Amjad Ali, 2023. "Transforming Saudi Arabia’s Energy Landscape towards a Sustainable Future: Progress of Solar Photovoltaic Energy Deployment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8761-:d:1495869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.