IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7703-d1471546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CTO Characteristics and ESG Performance of Corporation: Evidence from Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Taejin Lim

    (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu, Suwon-si 16419, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea)

  • Donggi Kim

    (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu, Suwon-si 16419, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea)

  • Keuntae Cho

    (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu, Suwon-si 16419, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
    Department of Systems Management Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu, Suwon-si 16419, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

While there has been a steady stream of research on chief technology officers (CTOs), studies specifically examining the expanding role of CTOs, particularly in the areas of environmental, social, and governance (ESG), remain scarce. Despite extensive research on boards of directors (BODs), chief executive officers (CEOs), and corporate social responsibility (CSR) committees, there is a significant lack of research on the role of CTOs in integrating ESG considerations into technology development and operations. To fill this gap, this study investigated the impact of CTO characteristics (personal, positional, and career-related) on corporate ESG performance. Based on previous studies, we created a conceptual model and proposed 12 hypotheses. A sample of 218 publicly traded corporations in Korea was selected, and a structural equation model was used to test the fit of the research model and hypotheses. The results indicate that the positional characteristics of the CTO positively affect a corporation’s ESG performance, whereas the career-related characteristics of the CTO negatively affect it. However, personal characteristics did not exhibit significant effects. Therefore, this study underscores the need for corporations to empower technology leaders, such as the CTO, and enable them to play an important role in strategic decision-making. By doing so, organizations can enhance their social responsibility, improve environmental sustainability, and maintain competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Taejin Lim & Donggi Kim & Keuntae Cho, 2024. "CTO Characteristics and ESG Performance of Corporation: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7703-:d:1471546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7703/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7703/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doohee Chung & Minhyung Kang, 2019. "Characteristics of Chief Technology Officers and Radical Innovation," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(03), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Hoje Jo & Maretno Harjoto, 2011. "Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 103(3), pages 351-383, October.
    3. Mike Wright & Keith M. Hmieleski & Donald S. Siegel & Michael D. Ensley, 2007. "The Role of Human Capital in Technological Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 31(6), pages 791-806, November.
    4. Karen A. Bantel & Susan E. Jackson, 1989. "Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(S1), pages 107-124, June.
    5. Fang Yang & Xu Li, 2023. "Corporate Financialization, ESG Performance and Sustainability Development: Evidence from Chinese-Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-28, February.
    6. Jin Zhu & Fei Huang, 2023. "Transformational Leadership, Organizational Innovation, and ESG Performance: Evidence from SMEs in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    7. Francoeur, Claude & Lakhal, Faten & Gaaya, Safa & Ben Saad, Itidel, 2021. "How do powerful CEOs influence corporate environmental performance?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 121-129.
    8. Xuemeng Guo & Ke Guo & Lingpeng Kong, 2023. "Industrial Agglomeration and Corporate ESG Performance: Empirical Evidence from Manufacturing and Producer Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Scott Shane, 2000. "Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 448-469, August.
    10. Mohammad Jizi & Aly Salama & Robert Dixon & Rebecca Stratling, 2014. "Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from the US Banking Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(4), pages 601-615, December.
    11. Constance E. Helfat & Margaret A. Peteraf, 2003. "The dynamic resource‐based view: capability lifecycles," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(10), pages 997-1010, October.
    12. Yingjun Lu & Indra Abeysekera & Corinne Cortese, 2015. "Corporate social responsibility reporting quality, board characteristics and corporate social reputation," Pacific Accounting Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(1), pages 95-118, February.
    13. Mikko Manner, 2010. "The Impact of CEO Characteristics on Corporate Social Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 53-72, June.
    14. Shan Wu & Ying Li, 2023. "A Study on the Impact of Digital Transformation on Corporate ESG Performance: The Mediating Role of Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marko Reimer & Sebastiaan Doorn & Mariano L. M. Heyden, 2018. "Unpacking Functional Experience Complementarities in Senior Leaders’ Influences on CSR Strategy: A CEO–Top Management Team Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 977-995, September.
    2. Lee, Gilsoo & Cho, Sam Yul & Arthurs, Jonathan & Lee, Eun Kyung, 2020. "Celebrity CEO, identity threat, and impression management: Impact of celebrity status on corporate social responsibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 69-84.
    3. Nguyen Thi Thanh Binh, 2024. "An application of artificial neural networks in corporate social responsibility decision making," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), March.
    4. Rui Baptista & Murat Karaöz & João Correia Leitão, 2020. "Diversification by young, small firms: the role of pre-entry resources and entry mistakes," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 103-122, June.
    5. Nhat Minh Tran, 2022. "CEO and Chairperson Characteristics and Corporate Environmental Performance: A Study of Cooperatives in Vietnam," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    6. Maw-Der Foo, 2011. "Teams developing business ideas: how member characteristics and conflict affect member-rated team effectiveness," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 33-46, January.
    7. He, Feng & Guo, Xinyao & Yue, Pengpeng, 2024. "Media coverage and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Andrea Vacca & Antonio Iazzi & Demetris Vrontis & Monica Fait, 2020. "The Role of Gender Diversity on Tax Aggressiveness and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Italian Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Bai, Min & Shen, Luxi & Li, Yue & Yu, Chia-Feng (Jeffrey), 2024. "Does legal justice promote stakeholder justice? Evidence from a judicial reform in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    10. Wenyuan Liu & Ting Ren & Weishan Tang, 2021. "Teachers in the Top Management Team and Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Caloghirou, Yannis & Giotopoulos, Ioannis & Kontolaimou, Alexandra & Korra, Efthymia & Tsakanikas, Aggelos, 2021. "Industry-university knowledge flows and product innovation: How do knowledge stocks and crisis matter?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(3).
    12. Andrew D. Henderson & Melissa E. Graebner, 2020. "Entering a Golden Age of Sustained Superiority: Entrepreneurial Creation or Discovery?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 1432-1451, November.
    13. Jihai Lu & Sohail Ahmad Javeed & Rashid Latief & Tao Jiang & Tze San Ong, 2021. "The Moderating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Association of Internal Corporate Governance and Profitability; Evidence from Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Mohammad Jizi, 2017. "The Influence of Board Composition on Sustainable Development Disclosure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 640-655, July.
    15. Jonathan Levie & Erkko Autio, 2008. "A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 235-263, October.
    16. Campa, Domenico & Zijlmans, Evy Wilhelmina Anna, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility recognition and support for the arts: Evidence from European financial institutions," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 818-827.
    17. Jared Allen & Regan Stevenson & Tang Wang, 2021. "Creative and resourceful: How human, social, and psychological resources affect creative workers’ ability to rebound after failure," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 705-719, August.
    18. Kiefner, Valentin & Mohr, Alexander & Schumacher, Christian, 2022. "Female executives and multinationals’ support of the UN's sustainable development goals," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(3).
    19. Hoang, Thi Hong Van & Pham, Linh & Nguyen, Thanh Thi Phuong, 2023. "Does country sustainability improve firm ESG reporting transparency? The moderating role of firm industry and CSR engagement," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    20. Packard, Mark D. & Burnham, Thomas A., 2021. "Do we understand each other? Toward a simulated empathy theory for entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7703-:d:1471546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.