IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p7073-d1458502.html

How Rural Communities Relate to Nature in Sub-Saharan Regions: Perception of Ecosystem Services Provided by Wetlands in South-Kivu

Author

Listed:
  • Chuma B. Géant

    (UR-Spheres, Faculty of Sciences, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
    Faculty of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Université Evangélique en Afrique, Bukavu 3323, Democratic Republic of the Congo)

  • Joost Wellens

    (UR-Spheres, Faculty of Sciences, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium)

  • Mushagalusa N. Gustave

    (Faculty of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Université Evangélique en Afrique, Bukavu 3323, Democratic Republic of the Congo)

  • Serge Schmitz

    (UR-Spheres, Faculty of Sciences, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium)

Abstract

Research on ecosystem services (ES) has become central to landscape planning, framing the relationship between people and nature. In Sub-Saharan regions, local communities rely heavily on wetlands for various ES. For the first time, we assessed perceptions of ES provided by these wetlands, focusing on marshes, peatlands, swamps, and inland valleys/floodplains in eastern DR Congo. Fieldwork combined with a survey of 510 households, using both open-ended and 35 direct questions, evaluated perceptions of wetland ecosystem services (WESs). The most frequently reported WES were provisioning (38%) and regulating (24%), while supporting (22%) and cultural (16%) were less mentioned. These perceptions varied across wetland types and among communities based on gender, religion, seniority in wetland use, land tenure, and educational level. Rural communities had a deep relationship with nature, shaped by cultural, economic, and geographical factors. Wetlands are viewed positively as sources of goods but also negatively as sources of diseases. A structural equation model (SEM) helped in identifying four latent variables—livelihood, knowledge, personal, and geographical factors—driving WES perceptions. These findings are relevant for developing wetland management policies and suggest including community engagement and collaboration in wetland restoration and regulatory frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuma B. Géant & Joost Wellens & Mushagalusa N. Gustave & Serge Schmitz, 2024. "How Rural Communities Relate to Nature in Sub-Saharan Regions: Perception of Ecosystem Services Provided by Wetlands in South-Kivu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-31, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7073-:d:1458502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7073/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7073/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Skylar R. Hopkins & Susanne H. Sokolow & Julia C. Buck & Giulio A. Leo & Isabel J. Jones & Laura H. Kwong & Christopher LeBoa & Andrea J. Lund & Andrew J. MacDonald & Nicole Nova & Sarah H. Olson & Al, 2021. "How to identify win–win interventions that benefit human health and conservation," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(4), pages 298-304, April.
    2. Greenland-Smith, Simon & Brazner, John & Sherren, Kate, 2016. "Farmer perceptions of wetlands and waterbodies: Using social metrics as an alternative to ecosystem service valuation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 58-69.
    3. Yannick Garcin & Enno Schefuß & Greta C. Dargie & Donna Hawthorne & Ian T. Lawson & David Sebag & George E. Biddulph & Bart Crezee & Yannick E. Bocko & Suspense A. Ifo & Y. Emmanuel Mampouya Wenina & , 2022. "Hydroclimatic vulnerability of peat carbon in the central Congo Basin," Nature, Nature, vol. 612(7939), pages 277-282, December.
    4. Ansoms, An & Wagemakers, Inge & Madison Walker, Michael & Murison, Jude, 2014. "Land Contestation at the Micro Scale: Struggles for Space in the African Marshes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 243-252.
    5. Alan B Dixon & Adrian P Wood, 2003. "Wetland cultivation and hydrological management in eastern Africa: Matching community and hydrological needs through sustainable wetland use," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 27(2), pages 117-129, May.
    6. Schuyt, Kirsten D., 2005. "Economic consequences of wetland degradation for local populations in Africa," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 177-190, April.
    7. Yannick Garcin & Enno Schefuß & Greta C. Dargie & Donna Hawthorne & Ian T. Lawson & David Sebag & George E. Biddulph & Bart Crezee & Yannick E. Bocko & Suspense A. Ifo & Y. Emmanuel Mampouya Wenina & , 2022. "Publisher Correction: Hydroclimatic vulnerability of peat carbon in the central Congo Basin," Nature, Nature, vol. 612(7938), pages 9-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bradley Hiller & Judith Fisher, 2023. "A Multifunctional ‘Scape Approach for Sustainable Management of Intact Ecosystems—A Review of Tropical Peatlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Padfield, Rory & Varkkey, Helena & Manzo, Kate & Ganesan, Vignaa, 2023. "Time bomb or gold mine? Policy, sustainability and media representations of tropical peatlands in Malaysia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    3. Putao Zhang & Junheng Yang & Haijun Cui & Weifeng Song & Yingying Liu & Xunxun Shi & Xiaoting Bi & Suyao Yuan, 2024. "Drainage and Afforestation More Strongly Affect Soil Microbial Composition in Fens than Bogs of Subtropical Moss Peatlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Yiming Zhang & Xianyu Huang & Bingyan Zhao & Chaoyang Yan & Hongyan Zhao & Hongbin Zhang & Toby A. Halamka & Rebecca H. Peel & Mike Vreeken & Angela V. Gallego-Sala & Richard D. Pancost & Shucheng Xie, 2025. "Microbial responses to changing plant community protect peatland carbon stores during Holocene drying," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Laxmi D. Bhatta & Sunita Chaudhary & Anju Pandit & Himlal Baral & Partha J. Das & Nigel E. Stork, 2016. "Ecosystem Service Changes and Livelihood Impacts in the Maguri-Motapung Wetlands of Assam, India," Land, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-14, June.
    6. Chiwaula, Levison & Waibel, Hermann, 2011. "Does seasonal vulnerability to poverty matter? A case study from the Hadejia-Nguru Wetlands in Nigeria," Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin 2011 19, Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics.
    7. Fitsum Dechasa & Feyera Senbeta & Dawit Diriba, 2025. "Knowledge, attitude and participation intention to use and management of wetlands: evidence from the central rift valley of Ethiopia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 1855-1875, January.
    8. Hassan, Suziana & Olsen, Søren Bøye & Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark, 2019. "Urban-rural divides in preferences for wetland conservation in Malaysia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 226-237.
    9. Sani Idris Garba & Susanna K. Ebmeier & Jean-François Bastin & Danilo Mollicone & Joseph Holden, 2025. "Wetland fragmentation associated with large populations across Africa," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Grotelüschen, Kristina & Gaydon, Donald S. & Langensiepen, Matthias & Ziegler, Susanne & Kwesiga, Julius & Senthilkumar, Kalimuthu & Whitbread, Anthony M. & Becker, Mathias, 2021. "Assessing the effects of management and hydro-edaphic conditions on rice in contrasting East African wetlands using experimental and modelling approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    11. Lara M. Lundsgaard-Hansen & Flurina Schneider & Julie G. Zaehringer & Christoph Oberlack & Win Myint & Peter Messerli, 2018. "Whose Agency Counts in Land Use Decision-Making in Myanmar? A Comparative Analysis of Three Cases in Tanintharyi Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-30, October.
    12. Olarewaju, Titilope Omolara & Shittu, Adebayo & Dipeolu, Adewale & Oduntan, Oladapo, . "Wetland importance and dependence among households around the Ogun river basin, Nigeria," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland, vol. 63(1).
    13. Fitsum Dechasa & Feyera Senbeta & Dawit Diriba Guta, 2021. "Economic value of wetlands services in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(1), pages 29-53, January.
    14. De Boeck, Filip, 2020. "Urban expansion, the politics of land, and occupation as infrastructure in Kinshasa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    15. Toundji Olivier Amoussou & Sarah Edore Edewor & Yaye Deffa Wane & Chibuye Florence Kunda-Wamuwi & Donissongou Dimitri Soro, 2023. "Exploring the Influence of the Interaction of Climate Change, Manmade Threats and COVID-19 on the Livelihoods of Wetland Communities in Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(4), pages 1-97, May.
    16. Cumming, Tracey L. & Shackleton, Ross T. & Förster, Johannes & Dini, John & Khan, Ahmed & Gumula, Mpho & Kubiszewski, Ida, 2017. "Achieving the national development agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through investment in ecological infrastructure: A case study of South Africa," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PB), pages 253-260.
    17. Ajwang’ Ondiek, Risper & Kitaka, Nzula & Omondi Oduor, Steve, 2016. "Assessment of provisioning and cultural ecosystem services in natural wetlands and rice fields in Kano floodplain, Kenya," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PA), pages 166-173.
    18. Lei Wang & Xufeng Mao & Xiuhua Song & Wenjia Tang & Wenying Wang & Hongyan Yu & Yanfang Deng & Ziping Zhang & Zhijun Zhang & Huakun Zhou, 2022. "How Rising Water Levels Altered Ecosystem Provisioning Services of the Area around Qinghai Lake from 2000 to 2020: An InVEST-RF-GTWR Combined Method," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Li Ma & Yueting Qin & Han Zhang & Jie Zheng & Yilei Hou & Yali Wen, 2021. "Improving Well-Being of Farmers Using Ecological Awareness around Protected Areas: Evidence from Qinling Region, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-22, September.
    20. Herrieth Machiwa & Joseph Mango & Dhritiraj Sengupta & Yunxuan Zhou, 2021. "Using Time-Series Remote Sensing Images in Monitoring the Spatial–Temporal Dynamics of LULC in the Msimbazi Basin, Tanzania," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7073-:d:1458502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.