IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p6919-d1454824.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Role of Board Structure on the Nexus between Green Innovations, Green Taxation, and Cosmetic Accounting Practice in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Hussaini Bala

    (Department of Accounting, Banking and Finance, Tishk International University, Erbil, Iraq)

  • Abdulaziz S. Al Naim

    (Accounting Department, Business School, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia)

  • Armaya’u Alhaji Sani

    (Department of Accounting, Banking and Finance, Tishk International University, Erbil, Iraq)

  • Abdulrahman Alomair

    (Accounting Department, Business School, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Nigeria is a foremost oil producer in Africa, and thus faces substantial environmental issues like pollution and climate change. Therefore, since green taxation and green innovation emphasize inventing new technologies, mitigating environmental damage, and stimulating sustainability, understanding and encouraging green taxation and green innovation might aid in reducing these environmental challenges and protect natural resources. This study therefore explored the influence of board structure on the link between green taxation, green innovation, and cosmetic accounting practices of firms. This study adopted auxiliary data from the World Bank, OECD, and Nigerian corporations’ annual reports. The analysis included 792 firm-year observations from 2014 to 2021. A logistic regression analysis was performed. This study documented that firms costume their income to avoid paying environmental taxes or to generate a more constructive image of their green practices. Similarly, it was found that green innovations attract firms to engage in cosmetic accounting practice in Nigeria. However, firms’ effective board mechanisms have been found to prevent the likelihood of cosmetic accounting practices. Finally, it was established that green taxes and green innovations could prevent firms from engaging in cosmetic accounting practices in companies with effective board mechanisms. This study is the first to explore the influence of governance structure on the nexus between green taxation and cosmetic accounting practices of firms. The findings of this study provide valuable information to regulatory authorities, policymakers, and companies seeking to promote sustainable growth and green protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Hussaini Bala & Abdulaziz S. Al Naim & Armaya’u Alhaji Sani & Abdulrahman Alomair, 2024. "Assessing the Role of Board Structure on the Nexus between Green Innovations, Green Taxation, and Cosmetic Accounting Practice in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6919-:d:1454824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6919/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6919/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ross McKitrick, 1997. "Double Dividend Environmental Taxation and Canadian Carbon Emissions Control," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 23(4), pages 417-438, December.
    2. Floropoulos, Stylianos & Tsipouridou, Maria & Spathis, Charalambos, 2024. "Book-tax conformity and earnings management: A research agenda," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    3. Jussi Karjalainen & Eero Kasanen & Juha Kinnunen & Jyrki Niskanen, 2023. "Dividends and tax avoidance as drivers of earnings management: Evidence from dividend-paying private SMEs in Finland," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(2), pages 906-937, March.
    4. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    5. Ball, Ray & Kothari, S. P. & Robin, Ashok, 2000. "The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-51, February.
    6. Atik, Asuman, 2009. "Detecting income-smoothing behaviors of Turkish listed companies through empirical tests using discretionary accounting changes," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 591-613.
    7. Adaku Jane Echendu & Henry Favour Okafor & Olayinka Iyiola, 2022. "Air Pollution, Climate Change and Ecosystem Health in the Niger Delta," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Eman F. Attia & Sameh Yassen & Ahmed Chafai & Ahmed Qotb, 2024. "The impact of board gender diversity on the accrual/real earnings management practice: evidence from an emerging market," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Hussaini Bala & Mujeeb Saif Mohsen Al-Absy & Abba Ya’u & Murtala Abdullahi & Armayau Alhaji Sani & Ghousia Khatoon & Umar Aliyu Mustapha & Basiru Musa, 2024. "The Effect of Environmental Taxes on Environmental Accounting Disclosure of Nigerian Oil and Gas Companies," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(2), pages 477-483, March.
    10. Ball, Ray & Kothari, S. P. & Robin, Ashok, 2000. "Corrigendum to "The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings"; [Journal of Accounting and Economics 29 (2000) 1-51]," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 241-241, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chan-Jane Lin & Tawei Wang & Chao-Jung Pan, 2016. "Financial reporting quality and investment decisions for family firms," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 499-532, June.
    2. Yuan Ding & Thomas Jeanjean & Hervé Stolowy, 2013. "Accounting for Stakeholders or Shareholders? The Case of R&D Reporting," Post-Print hal-01002936, HAL.
    3. Yik-Pui Low, Steven & Foo, Yee-Boon & Gul, Ferdinand A, 2023. "Corporate lobbying: Resource-seeking or rent-seeking? Evidence from audit fees," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    4. Boubaker, Sabri & Labégorre, Florence, 2008. "Ownership structure, corporate governance and analyst following: A study of French listed firms," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 961-976, June.
    5. Goncharov, Igor & Werner, Joerg R. & Zimmermann, Jochen, 2009. "Legislative demands and economic realities: Company and group accounts compared," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 334-362, December.
    6. Pathak, Jagdish & Sun, Jerry, 2013. "Does investor protection regime affect the effectiveness of outside directorship on the board?," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 19-33.
    7. Ray Ball, 2009. "Market and Political/Regulatory Perspectives on the Recent Accounting Scandals," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 277-323, May.
    8. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    9. Eliwa, Yasser & Haslam, Jim & Abraham, Santhosh, 2021. "Earnings quality and analysts’ information environment: Evidence from the EU market," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    10. Dea¡¯a Al-Deen Omar Al-Sraheen & Faudziah Hanim Fadzil & Syed Soffian Bin Syed Ismail, 2014. "Does Corporate Governance Matter? Evidence from Accounting Conservatism Practices among Jordanian Listed Companies," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(4), pages 64-80, December.
    11. Iatridis, George, 2010. "International Financial Reporting Standards and the quality of financial statement information," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 193-204, June.
    12. Jaehong Lee & Eunjoo Cho & Jong Sung Park, 2019. "Towards a More Transparent Disclosure for Corporate Sustainability: Focusing on the Regulation of Unfaithful Disclosure Designation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-26, November.
    13. Akihiro Yamada & Kento Fujita, 2022. "Impact of Parent Companies and Multiple Large Shareholders on Audit Fees in Stakeholder-Oriented Corporate Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    14. Chengru Hu & Wei Jiang, 2019. "Managerial risk incentives and accounting conservatism," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 781-813, April.
    15. Christian Prat Dit Hauret & Iliya Komarev, 2005. "Les Déterminants Du Choix De Membres Indépendants De Comités D'Audit Au Sein Des Entreprises Françaises Cotées : Une Analyse Empirique," Post-Print halshs-00581283, HAL.
    16. Dmitry Bazhutov & André Betzer & Francois Brochet & Markus Doumet & Peter Limbach, 2023. "The Supply and Effectiveness of Investor Relations in Insider- vs. Outsider-Oriented Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 660-683, January.
    17. Ben Ali Chiraz & Cédric Lesage, 2010. "Ownership concentration and audit fees: do auditors matter most when investors are protected least?," Post-Print hal-00476923, HAL.
    18. Christina M. Lewellen, 2023. "Tax haven incorporation and financial reporting transparency," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 1811-1855, September.
    19. Kentaro Koga & Satomi Uchino, 2012. "Bank-Firm Relationships and Security Analyst Activities: Evidence from Japan," The Japanese Accounting Review, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, vol. 2, pages 49-73, December.
    20. Kothari, S.P. & Ramanna, Karthik & Skinner, Douglas J., 2010. "Implications for GAAP from an analysis of positive research in accounting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 246-286, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6919-:d:1454824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.