IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i14p5944-d1433705.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Experts’ Perceptions on Regional Competitiveness Based on the Ten Key Factors of Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Amalia Kouskoura

    (Management of Technology Research Lab (MaterLab), University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece)

  • Eleni Kalliontzi

    (Management of Technology Research Lab (MaterLab), University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece)

  • Dimitris Skalkos

    (Laboratory of Food Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece)

  • Ioannis Bakouros

    (Management of Technology Research Lab (MaterLab), University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece)

Abstract

In the contemporary landscape, the foundation of competitive advantage lies in sustainability, particularly within the context of regional competitiveness. This topic explores the impact of sustainability on regional competitiveness. In this study, we assessed experts’ opinions on the impact of the main ten key factors of evaluation on regional competitiveness, namely the economy, labor market, poverty and social inclusion, health, education, environmental and energy considerations, transport infrastructure, science and technology, high-tech industries, and innovation. The study aims to understand how these factors influence regional competitiveness. A sample of 93 experts participated in a questionnaire survey through the Google platform from October to December 2023. This methodology was chosen to gather diverse expert opinions efficiently. The collected data were analyzed with statistical tools, combining cross and chi-square tests. Statistical analysis methods such as cross and chi-square tests were employed to analyze the collected data. Our findings indicate that experts recognize the economy (up to a positive level of 69.1%), the labor market (up to 64.7%), and the health infrastructure (up to 52.9%) as the main impact factors on regional competitiveness. Collective efforts and improvements in these factors are essential to alleviate poverty and social exclusion (up to 50.8%). Investments in education (up to 41.9%) and technological science and the digital society (up to 39.2%) are considered key after the main factors to promoting prosperity and competitiveness. Following them, there is a growing call for creating a greener, healthier, and more sustainable future, reflected in the focus on environmental and energy issues (up to 36.7%) and toward transport developments (up to 35.7%). At the bottom of the list are high-tech industry (up to 32.5%) and the innovation factor (up to 28.2%). These factor groups are highlighted as critical aspects for promoting prosperity and addressing social challenges in the region. The findings underscore the multifactorial nature of regional competitiveness, emphasizing both the important and less critical factors. It becomes apparent that the interpretation of regional competitiveness requires a comprehensive analysis of multiple factors, each contributing differently to overall competitiveness. Further examination and analysis are necessary to fully understand these dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Amalia Kouskoura & Eleni Kalliontzi & Dimitris Skalkos & Ioannis Bakouros, 2024. "Evaluating Experts’ Perceptions on Regional Competitiveness Based on the Ten Key Factors of Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:5944-:d:1433705
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/5944/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/5944/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sushil, 2018. "Flexible Systems Methodology: A Mixed-method/Multi-method Research Approach," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 19(2), pages 109-110, June.
    2. Rodica Crudu, 2019. "The Role of Innovative Entrepreneurship in the Economic Development of EU Member Countries," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 15(1), pages 35-60.
    3. Hie Joo Ahn & James Hamilton, 2022. "Measuring Labor-Force Participation and the Incidence and Duration of Unemployment," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 44, pages 1-32, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amalia Kouskoura & Eleni Kalliontzi & Dimitris Skalkos & Ioannis Bakouros, 2025. "Analysis of Results of Experts’ Perspectives of Sustainable Regional Competitiveness Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Multi-Criteria Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Angeliki Foutri & George Martinidis & Theodora Kalea & Yannis Fallas, 2025. "Developing Blueprints for Robust Regional Bioeconomy Strategies: The Case of Western Macedonia," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chodorow-Reich, Gabriel & Coglianese, John, 2021. "Projecting unemployment durations: A factor-flows simulation approach with application to the COVID-19 recession," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Sun, Jiandong & Feng, Shuaizhang & Hu, Yingyao, 2021. "Misclassification errors in labor force statuses and the early identification of economic recessions," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. David H. Bernstein & Andrew B. Martinez, 2021. "Jointly Modeling Male and Female Labor Participation and Unemployment," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Abbritti, Mirko & Consolo, Agostino, 2024. "Labour market skills, endogenous productivity and business cycles," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Jessica Gallant & Kory Kroft & Fabian Lange & Matthew J. Notowidigdo, 2020. "Temporary Unemployment and Labor Market Dynamics during the COVID-19 Recession," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 51(3 (Fall)), pages 167-226.
    6. Katarzyna Saczuk & Olga Zajkowska, 2024. "Measuring labour force participation during pandemics and methodological changes," Working Papers 2024-11, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    7. Mohammad I. Al-Housani & Muammer Koç & Mohammed S. Al-Sada, 2023. "Investigations on Entrepreneurship Needs, Challenges, and Models for Countries in Transition to Sustainable Development from Resource-Based Economy—Qatar as a Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-28, May.
    8. Mohammed Belbachir & Rachid Zammar, 2021. "Innovative entrepreneurship and the development of the audiovisual sector in Morocco. The case of the Societe Nationale de Radiodiffusion et de Television [L'entrepreneuriat innovant et le développ," Post-Print hal-03313583, HAL.
    9. Anas Al-Fattal, 2025. "Marketing Challenges in Entrepreneurship: Perspectives from Business Students," Merits, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Mojca Svetek & Mateja Drnovsek, 2022. "Exploring the Effects of Types of Early-Stage Entrepreneurial Activity on Subjective Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 149-170, January.
    11. Aleksander Jakimowicz & Daniel Rzeczkowski, 2019. "Diversification of innovation strategies of Polish industrial processing enterprises depending on their size after the global financial crisis," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 15(4), pages 35-76.
    12. Alexander Bick & Adam Blandin, 2023. "Employer Reallocation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Validation and Application of a Do-It-Yourself CPS," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 49, pages 58-76, July.
    13. Nezameddin Faghih & Ebrahim Bonyadi & Lida Sarreshtehdari, 2021. "On the utility of the stochastic processes in modeling the nexus between entrepreneurship and innovation: a nonparametric application of Bayesian inference," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 11(1), pages 97-111, December.
    14. Gerald D. Cohen, 2020. "Measuring employment during COVID-19: challenges and opportunities," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 55(4), pages 229-239, October.
    15. Shibata, Ippei, 2022. "Reassessing classification errors in the analysis of labor market dynamics," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    16. José Celso Contador & Walter Cardoso Satyro & Jose Luiz Contador & Mauro de Mesquita Spinola, 2020. "Flexibility in the Brazilian Industry 4.0: Challenges and Opportunities," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(1), pages 15-31, June.
    17. Ryan M. Goodstein & Mark J. Kutzbach, 2024. "The Effect of Job Loss on Bank Account Ownership," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 56(8), pages 1963-2000, December.
    18. Nhu-Ty Nguyen, 2020. "Performance Evaluation in Strategic Alliances: A Case of Vietnamese Construction Industry," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(1), pages 85-99, March.
    19. M. Mahdi Moeini Gharagozloo & Fatemeh Askarzadeh & Ali Moeini Gharagozloo, 2022. "More power for international entrepreneurs: the effect of digital readiness of economies on channeling national R&D resources to entrepreneurship," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 474-502, September.
    20. Suteera Chanthes, 2022. "University Outreach in the Triple Helix Model of Collaboration for Entrepreneurial Development," Journal of Educational Issues, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(2), pages 178192-1781, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:5944-:d:1433705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.