IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i12p5255-d1418805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantity Prediction of Construction and Demolition Waste Using Weighted Combined Grey Theory and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Model

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan Fang

    (School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Xinyi Shi

    (School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Yuan Chen

    (School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Jialiang He

    (School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

Abstract

With rapid urban development, the “waste-free city” concept has emerged. Therefore, the accurate prediction of the amount of C&D waste is of great importance. However, many countries and regions, including China, have not yet established C&D waste databases and standard prediction methods. This study proposed a method using a weighted combination of the grey theory model (GM) and the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model to predict the quantity of urban C&D waste in the future. Based on a case study in Guangzhou, this study compared the prediction results of three prediction models, namely the GM, the ARIMA, and the proposed weighted combined model of the GM and the ARIMA (GM-ARIMA). The results of this study proved that the proposed combined GM-ARIMA model had a better predictive performance than both the separated models. The mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) of the GM and ARIMA models were 12.11% and 14.26%, respectively, whereas the proposed GM-ARIMA model had a lower MAPE (8.5%). This study found that the generation of C&D waste in Guangzhou will continue to grow steadily. From 2024 to 2035, the quantity of C&D waste is expected to reach 850 million tons cumulatively, with an annual growth rate of 7.1%.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan Fang & Xinyi Shi & Yuan Chen & Jialiang He, 2024. "Quantity Prediction of Construction and Demolition Waste Using Weighted Combined Grey Theory and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5255-:d:1418805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5255/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5255/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ting Wang & Kaiyi Li & Defu Liu & Yang Yang & Dong Wu, 2022. "Estimating the Carbon Emission of Construction Waste Recycling Using Grey Model and Life Cycle Assessment: A Case Study of Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Yuan, Chaoqing & Liu, Sifeng & Fang, Zhigeng, 2016. "Comparison of China's primary energy consumption forecasting by using ARIMA (the autoregressive integrated moving average) model and GM(1,1) model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 384-390.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gu, Tianqi & Xu, Weiping & Liang, Hua & He, Qing & Zheng, Nan, 2024. "School bus transport service strategies’ policy-making mechanism – An evolutionary game approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    2. Ma, Shenglan & Huang, Junlin & Wang, Xiuxiu & Fu, Ying, 2025. "Multi-scenario simulation of low-carbon land use based on the SD-FLUS model in Changsha, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Pin Li & Jinsuo Zhang, 2019. "Is China’s Energy Supply Sustainable? New Research Model Based on the Exponential Smoothing and GM(1,1) Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, January.
    4. Primož Jelušič & Süleyman Gücek & Bojan Žlender & Cahit Gürer & Rok Varga & Tamara Bračko & Murat V. Taciroğlu & Burak E. Korkmaz & Şule Yarcı & Borut Macuh, 2023. "Potential of Using Waste Materials in Flexible Pavement Structures Identified by Optimization Design Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Ding, Song & Tao, Zui & Zhang, Huahan & Li, Yao, 2022. "Forecasting nuclear energy consumption in China and America: An optimized structure-adaptative grey model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    6. Ke Yan & Xudong Wang & Yang Du & Ning Jin & Haichao Huang & Hangxia Zhou, 2018. "Multi-Step Short-Term Power Consumption Forecasting with a Hybrid Deep Learning Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Meixia Wang, 2024. "Predicting China’s Energy Consumption and CO 2 Emissions by Employing a Novel Grey Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-25, October.
    8. Xinping Xiao & Xue Li, 2023. "A novel compositional data model for predicting the energy consumption structures of Europe, Japan, and China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11673-11698, October.
    9. Liu, Xiangfei & Ren, Mifeng & Yang, Zhile & Yan, Gaowei & Guo, Yuanjun & Cheng, Lan & Wu, Chengke, 2022. "A multi-step predictive deep reinforcement learning algorithm for HVAC control systems in smart buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    10. Xiwen Cui & Xinyu Guan & Dongyu Wang & Dongxiao Niu & Xiaomin Xu, 2022. "Can China Meet Its 2030 Total Energy Consumption Target? Based on an RF-SSA-SVR-KDE Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-13, August.
    11. Suat Ozturk & Feride Ozturk, 2018. "Forecasting Energy Consumption of Turkey by Arima Model," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 8(2), pages 52-60, February.
    12. Yang Yu & Yiming Du, 2025. "Does ICT change the relationship between trade openness and CO2 emissions? Evidence for RCEP countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 857-879, January.
    13. Syed Aziz Ur Rehman & Yanpeng Cai & Rizwan Fazal & Gordhan Das Walasai & Nayyar Hussain Mirjat, 2017. "An Integrated Modeling Approach for Forecasting Long-Term Energy Demand in Pakistan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, November.
    14. Wulfran Fendzi Mbasso & Reagan Jean Jacques Molu & Serge Raoul Dzonde Naoussi & Saatong Kenfack, 2022. "Demand-Supply Forecasting based on Deep Learning for Electricity Balance in Cameroon," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(4), pages 99-103, July.
    15. Myoungsoo Kim & Wonik Choi & Youngjun Jeon & Ling Liu, 2019. "A Hybrid Neural Network Model for Power Demand Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Wang, Qiang & Jiang, Feng, 2019. "Integrating linear and nonlinear forecasting techniques based on grey theory and artificial intelligence to forecast shale gas monthly production in Pennsylvania and Texas of the United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 781-803.
    17. Luzia, Ruan & Rubio, Lihki & Velasquez, Carlos E., 2023. "Sensitivity analysis for forecasting Brazilian electricity demand using artificial neural networks and hybrid models based on Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    18. Jacob Hale & Suzanna Long, 2020. "A Time Series Sustainability Assessment of a Partial Energy Portfolio Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Yonghua Li & Song Yao & Hezhou Jiang & Huarong Wang & Qinchuan Ran & Xinyun Gao & Xinyi Ding & Dandong Ge, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Prediction of Carbon Storage: An Integrated Framework Based on the MOP–PLUS–InVEST Model and an Applied Case Study in Hangzhou, East China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Hu, Huanling & Wang, Lin & Lv, Sheng-Xiang, 2020. "Forecasting energy consumption and wind power generation using deep echo state network," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 598-613.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5255-:d:1418805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.