IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4862-d1410198.html

Optimizing Renewable Energy Systems for Water Security: A Comparative Study of Reanalysis Models

Author

Listed:
  • José Vargas-Brochero

    (Department of Civil and Environmental, Universidad de la Costa, Calle 58 #55-66, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia)

  • Sebastián Hurtado-Castillo

    (Department of Civil and Environmental, Universidad de la Costa, Calle 58 #55-66, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia)

  • Jesús Altamiranda

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de Sucre, Carrera 27 #5A-04, Sincelejo 700001, Colombia)

  • Frederico Carlos M. de Menezes Filho

    (Institute of Exact and Technological Sciences, Federal University of Viçosa, Campus of Rio Paranaíba, Rodovia BR 230 KM 7, Rio Paranaíba 38810-000, Brazil)

  • Alexandre Beluco

    (Instituto de Pesquisas Hidráulicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Av Bento Gonçalves 9500, Porto Alegre 91540-000, Brazil)

  • Fausto A. Canales

    (Department of Civil and Environmental, Universidad de la Costa, Calle 58 #55-66, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia)

Abstract

The current global scenario of unequal access to water and electricity motivates the search for solutions based on available resources, such as renewable energies and desalination. Additionally, adequate sizing of renewables requires extensive and reliable time series, which are usually unavailable. Reanalysis models are an option to consider, but only after evaluating their local accuracy, generally through performance metrics. This study evaluated the performance of the solar radiation, temperature, and wind speed products from MERRA2 and ERA5-Land in comparison to ground data, as well as their influence on the optimal initial configuration of a renewable energy system for desalination in La Guajira, Colombia. HOMER Pro was the software tool employed to establish the best arrangements for the resulting renewable power systems, and the study included a sensitivity analysis considering different annual capacity shortages, operating hours, and energy needs for desalting. ERA5-Land performed better than MERRA2 in matching the time series from the local station. The relative error of the cost of electricity of systems dimensioned from reanalysis was less than 3% compared to systems from ground measurements, with a renewable fraction above 98%. For the study area, ERA5-Land reanalysis represents a reliable alternative to address the scarcity of solar resource records, but both reanalyses failed to reproduce the wind speed regime.

Suggested Citation

  • José Vargas-Brochero & Sebastián Hurtado-Castillo & Jesús Altamiranda & Frederico Carlos M. de Menezes Filho & Alexandre Beluco & Fausto A. Canales, 2024. "Optimizing Renewable Energy Systems for Water Security: A Comparative Study of Reanalysis Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4862-:d:1410198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4862/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4862/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramirez Camargo, Luis & Gruber, Katharina & Nitsch, Felix, 2019. "Assessing variables of regional reanalysis data sets relevant for modelling small-scale renewable energy systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1468-1478.
    2. Mehrjerdi, Hasan, 2020. "Modeling and optimization of an island water-energy nexus powered by a hybrid solar-wind renewable system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. Jorge Barrientos Mar n & Fernando Villada, 2020. "Regionalized Discount Rate to Evaluate Renewable Energy Projects in Colombia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(2), pages 332-336.
    4. Staffell, Iain & Pfenninger, Stefan, 2016. "Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1224-1239.
    5. Wang, Yi-Hui & Walter, Ryan K. & White, Crow & Farr, Hayley & Ruttenberg, Benjamin I., 2019. "Assessment of surface wind datasets for estimating offshore wind energy along the Central California Coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 343-353.
    6. Olauson, Jon, 2018. "ERA5: The new champion of wind power modelling?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 322-331.
    7. Pfenninger, Stefan & Staffell, Iain, 2016. "Long-term patterns of European PV output using 30 years of validated hourly reanalysis and satellite data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1251-1265.
    8. Wang, Sarah & Tarroja, Brian & Schell, Lori Smith & Shaffer, Brendan & Samuelsen, Scott, 2019. "Prioritizing among the end uses of excess renewable energy for cost-effective greenhouse gas emission reductions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 284-298.
    9. Ramli, Makbul A.M. & Hiendro, Ayong & Sedraoui, Khaled & Twaha, Ssennoga, 2015. "Optimal sizing of grid-connected photovoltaic energy system in Saudi Arabia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 489-495.
    10. Boilley, Alexandre & Wald, Lucien, 2015. "Comparison between meteorological re-analyses from ERA-Interim and MERRA and measurements of daily solar irradiation at surface," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 135-143.
    11. Gil Ruiz, Samuel Andrés & Cañón Barriga, Julio Eduardo & Martínez, J. Alejandro, 2022. "Assessment and validation of wind power potential at convection-permitting resolution for the Caribbean region of Colombia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    12. Cannon, D.J. & Brayshaw, D.J. & Methven, J. & Coker, P.J. & Lenaghan, D., 2015. "Using reanalysis data to quantify extreme wind power generation statistics: A 33 year case study in Great Britain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 767-778.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gruber, Katharina & Regner, Peter & Wehrle, Sebastian & Zeyringer, Marianne & Schmidt, Johannes, 2022. "Towards global validation of wind power simulations: A multi-country assessment of wind power simulation from MERRA-2 and ERA-5 reanalyses bias-corrected with the global wind atlas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    2. Nayak, Shubham & Simutis, Ernestas & Murcia Leon, Juan Pablo & Olsen, Bjarke Tobias & Koivisto, Matti Juhani, 2025. "Validation of European wind generation time series simulation: Importance of wakes, micro-scale adjustments and stochastic simulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 402(PA).
    3. Hayes, Liam & Stocks, Matthew & Blakers, Andrew, 2021. "Accurate long-term power generation model for offshore wind farms in Europe using ERA5 reanalysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    4. Ramirez Camargo, Luis & Gruber, Katharina & Nitsch, Felix, 2019. "Assessing variables of regional reanalysis data sets relevant for modelling small-scale renewable energy systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1468-1478.
    5. Valencia-Díaz, Alejandro & Toro, Eliana M. & Hincapié, Ricardo A., 2025. "Optimal planning and management of the energy–water–carbon nexus in hybrid AC/DC microgrids for sustainable development of remote communities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PB).
    6. Coker, Phil J. & Bloomfield, Hannah C. & Drew, Daniel R. & Brayshaw, David J., 2020. "Interannual weather variability and the challenges for Great Britain’s electricity market design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 509-522.
    7. Rabbani, R. & Zeeshan, M., 2020. "Exploring the suitability of MERRA-2 reanalysis data for wind energy estimation, analysis of wind characteristics and energy potential assessment for selected sites in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1240-1251.
    8. Reinhold Lehneis & Daniela Thrän, 2023. "Temporally and Spatially Resolved Simulation of the Wind Power Generation in Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Onodera, Hiroaki & Delage, Rémi & Nakata, Toshihiko, 2024. "The role of regional renewable energy integration in electricity decarbonization—A case study of Japan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 363(C).
    10. Nir Y. Krakauer & Daniel S. Cohan, 2017. "Interannual Variability and Seasonal Predictability of Wind and Solar Resources," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-14, July.
    11. Zhang, Hengxu & Cao, Yongji & Zhang, Yi & Terzija, Vladimir, 2018. "Quantitative synergy assessment of regional wind-solar energy resources based on MERRA reanalysis data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 172-182.
    12. Gualtieri, G., 2022. "Analysing the uncertainties of reanalysis data used for wind resource assessment: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    13. Drew, Daniel R. & Coker, Phil J. & Bloomfield, Hannah C. & Brayshaw, David J. & Barlow, Janet F. & Richards, Andrew, 2019. "Sunny windy sundays," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 870-875.
    14. Campion, Nicolas & Montanari, Giulia & Guzzini, Alessandro & Visser, Lennard & Alcayde, Alfredo, 2025. "Green hydrogen techno-economic assessments from simulated and measured solar photovoltaic power profiles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    15. Kies, Alexander & Schyska, Bruno U. & Bilousova, Mariia & El Sayed, Omar & Jurasz, Jakub & Stoecker, Horst, 2021. "Critical review of renewable generation datasets and their implications for European power system models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    16. Staffell, Iain & Pfenninger, Stefan, 2018. "The increasing impact of weather on electricity supply and demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 65-78.
    17. Bowen Li & Sukanta Basu & Simon J. Watson & Herman W. J. Russchenberg, 2021. "A Brief Climatology of Dunkelflaute Events over and Surrounding the North and Baltic Sea Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-14, October.
    18. Russell McKenna & Stefan Pfenninger & Heidi Heinrichs & Johannes Schmidt & Iain Staffell & Katharina Gruber & Andrea N. Hahmann & Malte Jansen & Michael Klingler & Natascha Landwehr & Xiaoli Guo Lars', 2021. "Reviewing methods and assumptions for high-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy potential assessments," Papers 2103.09781, arXiv.org.
    19. de Aquino Ferreira, Saulo Custodio & Cyrino Oliveira, Fernando Luiz & Maçaira, Paula Medina, 2022. "Validation of the representativeness of wind speed time series obtained from reanalysis data for Brazilian territory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    20. Gunnell, Yanni & Mietton, Michel & Touré, Amadou Abdourhamane & Fujiki, Kenji, 2023. "Potential for wind farming in West Africa from an analysis of daily peak wind speeds and a review of low-level jet dynamics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4862-:d:1410198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.