IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i10p4170-d1395657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coupling Global Parameters and Local Flow Optimization of a Pulsed Ejector for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells

Author

Listed:
  • Chao Li

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Baigang Sun

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
    Beijing Institute of Technology Chongqing Innovation Center, Beijing Institute of Technology, Chongqing 401120, China)

  • Lingzhi Bao

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), as an important utilization of hydrogen energy, contribute to the sustainable development of global energy. Pulsed ejectors have a high potential for improving the hydrogen utilization of PEMFCs in the full operating range by circulating unconsumed hydrogen. In this study, a pulsed ejector applied to a 120 kW fuel cell was designed, and the flow characteristics were analysed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Based on the data from the CFD model, the global optimization of the ejector was carried out using the Gaussian process regression (GPR) surrogate model and the grey wolf optimization (GWO) algorithm. The local structure was then further optimized using an adjoint method coupling streamlining modification that takes into account the local flow characteristics. The CFD results showed that, under a fixed structure, increasing the pressure difference between the secondary flow and the ejector outlet would promote boundary layer separation, shorten the shockwave chain length, change the effective flow area of the secondary flow, and lower the entrainment ratio (ER). The analytical results from the GPR model indicated significant interactions among the structural parameters. The globally optimized ejector using GPR and GWO improved the hydrogen entrainment ratio from 1.42 to 3.12 at the design point. Furthermore, the results of streamlining local optimization show that the entrainment ratio increased by 1.67% at the design point and increased by up to 3.99% over the full operating range compared to the optimized ejector by global optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Chao Li & Baigang Sun & Lingzhi Bao, 2024. "Coupling Global Parameters and Local Flow Optimization of a Pulsed Ejector for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4170-:d:1395657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4170/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4170/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Song, Yajie & Wang, Xinli & Wang, Lei & Pan, Fengwen & Chen, Wenmiao & Xi, Fuqiang, 2021. "A twin-nozzle ejector for hydrogen recirculation in wide power operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    2. Chong, Daotong & Hu, Mengqi & Chen, Weixiong & Wang, Jinshi & Liu, Jiping & Yan, Junjie, 2014. "Experimental and numerical analysis of supersonic air ejector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 679-684.
    3. Pei, Pucheng & Ren, Peng & Li, Yuehua & Wu, Ziyao & Chen, Dongfang & Huang, Shangwei & Jia, Xiaoning, 2019. "Numerical studies on wide-operating-range ejector based on anodic pressure drop characteristics in proton exchange membrane fuel cell system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 729-738.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Song, Yajie & Wang, Xinli & Wang, Lei & Pan, Fengwen & Chen, Wenmiao & Xi, Fuqiang, 2021. "A twin-nozzle ejector for hydrogen recirculation in wide power operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    2. Tashtoush, Bourhan M. & Al-Nimr, Moh'd A. & Khasawneh, Mohammad A., 2019. "A comprehensive review of ejector design, performance, and applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 138-172.
    3. Li, Fenglei & Wu, Changzhi & Wang, Xiangyu & Tian, Qi & Teo, Kok Lay, 2016. "Sparsity-enhanced optimization for ejector performance prediction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 25-34.
    4. Xu Liang & Huifang Kang & Rui Zeng & Yue Pang & Yun Yang & Yunlu Qiu & Yuanxu Tao & Jun Shen, 2024. "Impact of the Structural Parameters on the Performance of a Regenerative-Type Hydrogen Recirculation Blower for Vehicular Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-28, February.
    5. Yu, Zhongshuai & Liu, Fang & Li, Chengzhang, 2023. "Numerical study on effects of hydrogen ejector on PEMFC performances," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    6. Tang, Yongzhi & Liu, Zhongliang & Li, Yanxia & Shi, Can & Lv, Chen, 2019. "A combined pressure regulation technology with multi-optimization of the entrainment passage for performance improvement of the steam ejector in MED-TVC desalination system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 46-57.
    7. Tang, Yongzhi & Liu, Zhongliang & Shi, Can & Li, Yanxia, 2018. "A novel steam ejector with pressure regulation to optimize the entrained flow passage for performance improvement in MED-TVC desalination system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 305-316.
    8. Chen, Hongjie & Zhu, Jiahua & Ge, Jing & Lu, Wei & Zheng, Lixing, 2020. "A cylindrical mixing chamber ejector analysis model to predict the optimal nozzle exit position," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    9. Pei, Pucheng & Ren, Peng & Li, Yuehua & Wu, Ziyao & Chen, Dongfang & Huang, Shangwei & Jia, Xiaoning, 2019. "Numerical studies on wide-operating-range ejector based on anodic pressure drop characteristics in proton exchange membrane fuel cell system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 729-738.
    10. Liu, Yang & Tu, Zhengkai & Chan, Siew Hwa, 2023. "Water management and performance enhancement in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell system using optimized gas recirculation devices," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    11. Strušnik, Dušan & Marčič, Milan & Golob, Marjan & Hribernik, Aleš & Živić, Marija & Avsec, Jurij, 2016. "Energy efficiency analysis of steam ejector and electric vacuum pump for a turbine condenser air extraction system based on supervised machine learning modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 386-405.
    12. Yiqiao Li & Shengqiang Shen & Chao Niu & Yali Guo & Liuyang Zhang, 2022. "The Effect of Different Pressure Conditions on Shock Waves in a Supersonic Steam Ejector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Cai, Zun & Zhu, Jiajian & Sun, Mingbo & Wang, Zhenguo & Bai, Xue-Song, 2018. "Ignition processes and modes excited by laser-induced plasma in a cavity-based supersonic combustor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1777-1782.
    14. Han, Yu & Wang, Xiaodong & Sun, Hao & Zhang, Guangli & Guo, Lixin & Tu, Jiyuan, 2019. "CFD simulation on the boundary layer separation in the steam ejector and its influence on the pumping performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 469-483.
    15. Zheng, Ping & Li, Bing & Qin, Jingxuan, 2018. "CFD simulation of two-phase ejector performance influenced by different operation conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1129-1145.
    16. Jianmei Feng & Jiquan Han & Zihui Pang & Xueyuan Peng, 2023. "Designing Hydrogen Recirculation Ejectors for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-10, January.
    17. Li Chen & Keda Xu & Zuyong Yang & Zhen Yan & Zuomin Dong, 2022. "Optimal Design and Operation of Dual-Ejector PEMFC Hydrogen Supply and Circulation System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    18. Kuo, Jenn-Kun & Hsieh, Chun-Yao, 2021. "Numerical investigation into effects of ejector geometry and operating conditions on hydrogen recirculation ratio in 80 kW PEM fuel cell system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    19. Wu, Yifei & Zhao, Hongxia & Zhang, Cunquan & Wang, Lei & Han, Jitian, 2018. "Optimization analysis of structure parameters of steam ejector based on CFD and orthogonal test," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 79-93.
    20. Jafarian, Ali & Azizi, Mohammad & Forghani, Pezhman, 2016. "Experimental and numerical investigation of transient phenomena in vacuum ejectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 528-536.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4170-:d:1395657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.