IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i10p4168-d1395640.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tracer Gas Method Evaluation for Assessing the Energy Potential of Biogas from Chicken Farms in the Canary Islands

Author

Listed:
  • María Asensio-Ramos

    (Instituto Volcanológico de Canarias (INVOLCAN), 38400 Puerto de la Cruz, Spain)

  • Gladys V. Melián

    (Instituto Volcanológico de Canarias (INVOLCAN), 38400 Puerto de la Cruz, Spain
    Instituto Tecnológico y de Energías Renovables (ITER), 38611 Granadilla de Abona, Spain)

  • Eleazar Padrón

    (Instituto Volcanológico de Canarias (INVOLCAN), 38400 Puerto de la Cruz, Spain
    Instituto Tecnológico y de Energías Renovables (ITER), 38611 Granadilla de Abona, Spain)

  • Pedro A. Hernández

    (Instituto Volcanológico de Canarias (INVOLCAN), 38400 Puerto de la Cruz, Spain
    Instituto Tecnológico y de Energías Renovables (ITER), 38611 Granadilla de Abona, Spain)

  • Nemesio M. Pérez

    (Instituto Volcanológico de Canarias (INVOLCAN), 38400 Puerto de la Cruz, Spain
    Instituto Tecnológico y de Energías Renovables (ITER), 38611 Granadilla de Abona, Spain)

  • José Luis Peraza Cano

    (Independent Researcher, 38900 Valverde, Spain)

Abstract

Biodigestion in farming and agriculture offers environmental and economic benefits, but investing in biodigesters carries real-world risks for enterprises. This study analyzes methane (CH 4 ) emissions from a poultry farm biodigester in Tenerife Island, Canary Islands, Spain, conceptualized as a right-angled prism measuring 45 m wide, 25 m long, and 12 m tall, with an internal volume of approximately 13,500 m 3 . Using a Neon tracer gas technique, CH 4 emission rates were quantified in situ during two surveys in February 2021 and October 2022, capturing seasonal variability in ambient conditions. Biogas analysis was performed using a portable micro-gas chromatograph in less than 5 min, revealing stable CH 4 production rates of approximately 200 kg·d −1 (~310 m 3 ·d −1 ) and 330 kg·d −1 (~500 m 3 ·d −1 ) for the two experiments, respectively. The composition of biogas indicated CH 4 concentrations of around 38–43%, with the remaining composition consisting of carbon dioxide (19–26%), nitrogen (36–27%), oxygen (7–4%), and trace amounts of other gases. A comparison with a theoretical model showed a good correlation. This approach enhances biodigester investment attractiveness by enabling enterprises to optimize efficiency promptly. The obtained data were used to estimate the energy potential of biogas from chicken farms in the Canary Islands.

Suggested Citation

  • María Asensio-Ramos & Gladys V. Melián & Eleazar Padrón & Pedro A. Hernández & Nemesio M. Pérez & José Luis Peraza Cano, 2024. "Tracer Gas Method Evaluation for Assessing the Energy Potential of Biogas from Chicken Farms in the Canary Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4168-:d:1395640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4168/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4168/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Clercq, Djavan & Wen, Zongguo & Gottfried, Oliver & Schmidt, Franziska & Fei, Fan, 2017. "A review of global strategies promoting the conversion of food waste to bioenergy via anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 204-221.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roozbeh Feiz & Jonas Ammenberg & Annika Björn & Yufang Guo & Magnus Karlsson & Yonghui Liu & Yuxian Liu & Laura Shizue Moriga Masuda & Alex Enrich-Prast & Harald Rohracher & Kristina Trygg & Sepehr Sh, 2019. "Biogas Potential for Improved Sustainability in Guangzhou, China—A Study Focusing on Food Waste on Xiaoguwei Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Esther Lee & Gerald Shurson & Sang-Hyon Oh & Jae-Cheol Jang, 2024. "The Management of Food Waste Recycling for a Sustainable Future: A Case Study on South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Kari-Anne Lyng & Lise Skovsgaard & Henrik Klinge Jacobsen & Ole Jørgen Hanssen, 2020. "The implications of economic instruments on biogas value chains: a case study comparison between Norway and Denmark," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 7125-7152, December.
    4. Daniele Duca & Giuseppe Toscano, 2022. "Biomass Energy Resources: Feedstock Quality and Bioenergy Sustainability," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-6, June.
    5. Dalke, Rachel & Demro, Delaney & Khalid, Yusra & Wu, Haoran & Urgun-Demirtas, Meltem, 2021. "Current status of anaerobic digestion of food waste in the United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Zamri, M.F.M.A. & Hasmady, Saiful & Akhiar, Afifi & Ideris, Fazril & Shamsuddin, A.H. & Mofijur, M. & Fattah, I. M. Rizwanul & Mahlia, T.M.I., 2021. "A comprehensive review on anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    7. Woon, Kok Sin & Phuang, Zhen Xin & Lin, Zuchao & Lee, Chew Tin, 2021. "A novel food waste management framework combining optical sorting system and anaerobic digestion: A case study in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    8. Tingting Liu & Qian Zhang & Xiaowen Kang & Jiaqi Hou & Tao Luo & Yi Zhang, 2022. "Household Food Waste to Biogas in Västerås, Sweden: A Comprehensive Case Study of Waste Valorization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Negri, Camilla & Ricci, Marina & Zilio, Massimo & D'Imporzano, Giuliana & Qiao, Wei & Dong, Renjie & Adani, Fabrizio, 2020. "Anaerobic digestion of food waste for bio-energy production in China and Southeast Asia: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    10. Do, Quynh & Ramudhin, Amar & Colicchia, Claudia & Creazza, Alessandro & Li, Dong, 2021. "A systematic review of research on food loss and waste prevention and management for the circular economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    11. Olkis, Christopher & Brandani, Stefano & Santori, Giulio, 2019. "Design and experimental study of a small scale adsorption desalinator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Andante Hadi Pandyaswargo & Premakumara Jagath Dickella Gamaralalage & Chen Liu & Michael Knaus & Hiroshi Onoda & Faezeh Mahichi & Yanghui Guo, 2019. "Challenges and an Implementation Framework for Sustainable Municipal Organic Waste Management Using Biogas Technology in Emerging Asian Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-27, November.
    13. Istrate, Ioan-Robert & Medina-Martos, Enrique & Galvez-Martos, Jose-Luis & Dufour, Javier, 2021. "Assessment of the energy recovery potential of municipal solid waste under future scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    14. Qiao Wang & Huan Li & Kai Feng & Jianguo Liu, 2020. "Oriented Fermentation of Food Waste towards High-Value Products: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-29, October.
    15. Santo Fabio Corsino & Michele Torregrossa & Gaspare Viviani, 2021. "Biomethane Production from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Selected Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW) with Sewage Sludge: Effect of the Inoculum to Substrate Ratio (ISR) and Mixture Composit," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Li, Chao & He, Pinjing & Hao, Liping & Lü, Fan & Shao, Liming & Zhang, Hua, 2022. "Diverse acetate-oxidizing syntrophs contributing to biogas production from food waste in full-scale anaerobic digesters in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 240-250.
    17. Bolen, T.J. & Hasan, Mahmudul & Conway, Timothy & Stéphane Yaméogo, Djigui David & Sanchez, Pablo & Rahman, Arifur & Azam, Hossain, 2022. "Feasibility assessment of biogas production from the anaerobic co-digestion of cheese whey, grease interceptor waste and pulped food waste for WRRF," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4168-:d:1395640. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.