IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2023i1p369-d1311270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ultrafiltration Harvesting of Microalgae Culture Cultivated in a WRRF: Long-Term Performance and Techno-Economic and Carbon Footprint Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Francisco Mora-Sánchez

    (CALAGUA-Unidad Mixta UV-UPV, Departament d’Enginyeria Química, Universitat de València, Avinguda de la Universitat s/n, 46100 Valencia, Spain)

  • Josué González-Camejo

    (CALAGUA-Unidad Mixta UV-UPV, Departament d’Enginyeria Química, Universitat de València, Avinguda de la Universitat s/n, 46100 Valencia, Spain)

  • Guillermo Noriega-Hevia

    (CALAGUA-Unidad Mixta UV-UPV, Institut Universitari d’Investigació d’Enginyeria de l’Aigua i Medi Ambient-IIAMA, Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Camí de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Aurora Seco

    (CALAGUA-Unidad Mixta UV-UPV, Departament d’Enginyeria Química, Universitat de València, Avinguda de la Universitat s/n, 46100 Valencia, Spain)

  • María Victoria Ruano

    (CALAGUA-Unidad Mixta UV-UPV, Departament d’Enginyeria Química, Universitat de València, Avinguda de la Universitat s/n, 46100 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

A cross-flow ultrafiltration harvesting system for a pre-concentrated microalgae culture was tested in an innovative anaerobic-based WRRF. The microalgae culture was cultivated in a membrane photobioreactor fed with effluent from an anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating sewage. These harvested microalgae biomasses were then anaerobically co-digested with primary and secondary sludge from the water line. Depending on the needs of this anaerobic co-digestion, the filtration harvesting process was evaluated intermittently over a period of 212 days for different operating conditions, mainly the total amount of microalgae biomass harvested and the desired final total solids concentration (up to 15.9 g·L −1 with an average of 9.7 g·L −1 ). Concentration ratios of 15–27 were obtained with average transmembrane fluxes ranging from 5 to 28 L·m −2 ·h −1 . Regarding membrane cleaning, both backflushing and chemical cleaning resulted in transmembrane flux recoveries that were, on average, 21% higher than those achieved with backflushing alone. The carbon footprint assessment shows promising results, as the GHG emissions associated with the cross-flow ultrafiltration harvesting process could be less than the emissions savings associated with the energy recovered from biogas production from the anaerobic valorisation of the harvested microalgae.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Francisco Mora-Sánchez & Josué González-Camejo & Guillermo Noriega-Hevia & Aurora Seco & María Victoria Ruano, 2023. "Ultrafiltration Harvesting of Microalgae Culture Cultivated in a WRRF: Long-Term Performance and Techno-Economic and Carbon Footprint Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:369-:d:1311270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/369/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/369/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Piotr Sulewski & Wiktor Ignaciuk & Magdalena Szymańska & Adam Wąs, 2023. "Development of the Biomethane Market in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-34, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Orlando Corigliano & Marco Iannuzzi & Crescenzo Pellegrino & Francesco D’Amico & Leonardo Pagnotta & Petronilla Fragiacomo, 2023. "Enhancing Energy Processes and Facilities Redesign in an Anaerobic Digestion Plant for Biomethane Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-29, August.
    2. Ayub Golmakani & Basil Wadi & Vasilije Manović & Seyed Ali Nabavi, 2023. "Comparative Evaluation of PSA, PVSA, and Twin PSA Processes for Biogas Upgrading: The Purity, Recovery, and Energy Consumption Dilemma," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Marilena Labianca & Nicola Faccilongo & Umberto Monarca & Mariarosaria Lombardi, 2023. "A Location Model for the Agro-Biomethane Plants in Supporting the REPowerEU Energy Policy Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:369-:d:1311270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.