IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7044-d1130583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Quality of Sustainable Airline Services Utilizing the Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Al Awadh

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha 64231, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Monitoring customer satisfaction in the airline service industry is critical for improving service quality and meeting consumer expectations. Modern and comprehensive quality of service measurement tools offer firms critical information about how consumers perceive quality and their service quality expectations. It is vital to assess service quality in airline transportation, which is becoming more popular in comparison to other modes of transportation, resulting in increased competition. Businesses should know their clients well and make adjustments by properly analyzing their expectations if they want to compete in the market and enhance the quality of their services. As a consequence of this, we decided to utilize a model called the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in order to determine how passengers in Saudi Arabia evaluate the level of service that is offered by airlines. Using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach to model the five SERVQUAL dimensions and 22 sub-criteria, the purpose of the study effort was to determine the criteria for improving airline services. For the purpose of the study, the service from three different airlines was chosen and assessed based on their overall quality performance. Systematically, the AHP-based approach is presented for rating the airlines according to the Saudi aviation services. According to the observations, airlines should focus more on reliability, assurance, responsiveness, and empathy and less on tangibles. The sub-criteria also state that the airlines’ top aim should be to deliver accurate services on the first try. According to the AHP analysis, Saudi Airlines ranked first, followed by flynas and then flydeal. The findings of this study have consequences for decisions about the effective monitoring of the total airline system in order to enhance the delivery of high-quality services that would increase customers’ pleasure, which is the aim of airline services.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Al Awadh, 2023. "Assessing the Quality of Sustainable Airline Services Utilizing the Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7044-:d:1130583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7044/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7044/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pakdil, Fatma & Aydın, Özlem, 2007. "Expectations and perceptions in airline services: An analysis using weighted SERVQUAL scores," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 229-237.
    2. Gupta, Himanshu, 2018. "Evaluating service quality of airline industry using hybrid best worst method and VIKOR," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 35-47.
    3. Liou, James J.H. & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2007. "A non-additive model for evaluating airline service quality," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 131-138.
    4. Aksoy, Safak & Atilgan, Eda & Akinci, Serkan, 2003. "Airline services marketing by domestic and foreign firms: differences from the customers’ viewpoint," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 9(6), pages 343-351.
    5. Tu, Chuc Anh & Rasoulinezhad, Ehsan & Sarker, Tapan, 2020. "Investigating solutions for the development of a green bond market: Evidence from analytic hierarchy process," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    6. Vargas, Luis G., 1990. "An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 2-8, September.
    7. Liou, James J.H. & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung & Chang, Han-Chun, 2007. "Airline safety measurement using a hybrid model," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 243-249.
    8. Park, Jin-Woo & Robertson, Rodger & Wu, Cheng-Lung, 2004. "The effect of airline service quality on passengers’ behavioural intentions: a Korean case study," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(6), pages 435-439.
    9. Jin-Woo Park & Rodger Robertson & Cheng-Lung Wu, 2006. "Modelling the Impact of Airline Service Quality and Marketing Variables on Passengers’ Future Behavioural Intentions," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 359-381, July.
    10. Park, Jin-Woo, 2007. "Passenger perceptions of service quality: Korean and Australian case studies," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 238-242.
    11. Chen, I-Shuo, 2016. "A combined MCDM model based on DEMATEL and ANP for the selection of airline service quality improvement criteria: A study based on the Taiwanese airline industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 7-18.
    12. Sophie Gaultier-Gaillard & Jean-Paul Louisot, 2006. "Risks to Reputation: A Global Approach," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 31(3), pages 425-445, July.
    13. Thomas L. Saaty, 1994. "How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 19-43, December.
    14. Baffoe, Gideon, 2019. "Exploring the utility of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in ranking livelihood activities for effective and sustainable rural development interventions in developing countries," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 197-204.
    15. Jou, Rong-Chang & Lam, Soi-Hoi & Hensher, David A. & Chen, Chih-Cheng & Kuo, Chung-Wei, 2008. "The effect of service quality and price on international airline competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 580-592, July.
    16. Deniz Sulu & Huseyin Arasli & Mehmet Bahri Saydam, 2021. "Air-Travelers’ Perceptions of Service Quality during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Tripadvisor Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, December.
    17. Kos Koklic, Mateja & Kukar-Kinney, Monika & Vegelj, Spela, 2017. "An investigation of customer satisfaction with low-cost and full-service airline companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 188-196.
    18. Basfirinci, Cigdem & Mitra, Amitava, 2015. "A cross cultural investigation of airlines service quality through integration of Servqual and the Kano model," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 239-248.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Grazia Bellizzi & Luigi dell’Olio & Laura Eboli & Carmen Forciniti & Gabriella Mazzulla, 2020. "Passengers’ Expectations on Airlines’ Services: Design of a Stated Preference Survey and Preliminary Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Kazim Sari & Abdullah Alper Sener, 2022. "Service quality and intention to recommend in low-cost and full-service airlines in Turkey," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 49(3), pages 297-309, September.
    3. Shah, Faisal Tehseen & Syed, Zaineb & Imam, Abeer & Raza, Aiman, 2020. "The impact of airline service quality on passengers’ behavioral intentions using passenger satisfaction as a mediator," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    4. Bellizzi, Maria Grazia & dell’Olio, Luigi & Eboli, Laura & Mazzulla, Gabriella, 2021. "Detecting passengers' heterogeneity on airlines’ services using SP data," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    5. Juan de Oña & Rocio de Oña, 2015. "Quality of Service in Public Transport Based on Customer Satisfaction Surveys: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Approaches," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 605-622, August.
    6. Samanci, Simge & Didem Atalay, Kumru & Bahar Isin, Feride, 2021. "Focusing on the big picture while observing the concerns of both managers and passengers in the post-covid era," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. Li, Wenhua & Yu, Suihuai & Pei, Huining & Zhao, Chuan & Tian, Baozhen, 2017. "A hybrid approach based on fuzzy AHP and 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic method for evaluation in-flight service quality," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 49-64.
    8. Gupta, Himanshu, 2018. "Evaluating service quality of airline industry using hybrid best worst method and VIKOR," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 35-47.
    9. Perçin, Selçuk, 2018. "Evaluating airline service quality using a combined fuzzy decision-making approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 48-60.
    10. Chandra Mahapatra, Subas & Bellamkonda, Raja Shekhar, 2023. "Higher expectations of passengers do really sense: Development and validation a multiple scale-FliQual for air transport service quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. HakJun Song & Wenjia Ruan & Yunmi Park, 2019. "Effects of Service Quality, Corporate Image, and Customer Trust on the Corporate Reputation of Airlines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, June.
    12. Chen, I-Shuo, 2016. "A combined MCDM model based on DEMATEL and ANP for the selection of airline service quality improvement criteria: A study based on the Taiwanese airline industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 7-18.
    13. Kurtulmuşoğlu, Feride Bahar & Can, Gülin Feryal & Tolon, Metehan, 2016. "A voice in the skies: Listening to airline passenger preferences," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 130-137.
    14. Patricia Lippitt & Nadine Itani & John F. O’Connell & David Warnock-Smith & Marina Efthymiou, 2023. "Investigating Airline Service Quality from a Business Traveller Perspective through the Integration of the Kano Model and Importance–Satisfaction Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Henderson, Isaac Levi & Tsui, Kan Wai Hong & Ngo, Thanh & Gilbey, Andrew & Avis, Mark, 2019. "Airline brand choice in a duopolistic market: The case of New Zealand," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 147-163.
    16. Tahanisaz, Sahar & shokuhyar, Sajjad, 2020. "Evaluation of passenger satisfaction with service quality: A consecutive method applied to the airline industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    17. Deveci, Muhammet & Özcan, Ender & John, Robert & Öner, Sultan Ceren, 2018. "Interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy set method for improving the service quality of domestic airlines in Turkey," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 83-98.
    18. Kuo Cheng Chung & Paul Juinn Bing Tan, 2022. "Options to Improve Service Quality to Enhance Value Co-Creation for Customers in the Aviation Industry in Taiwan," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    19. Sezgen, Eren & Mason, Keith J. & Mayer, Robert, 2019. "Voice of airline passenger: A text mining approach to understand customer satisfaction," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 65-74.
    20. Tsafarakis, Stelios & Kokotas, Theodosios & Pantouvakis, Angelos, 2018. "A multiple criteria approach for airline passenger satisfaction measurement and service quality improvement," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 61-75.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7044-:d:1130583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.