IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p6474-d1120720.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Interprovincial Differences in CO 2 Emissions and Peak Prediction in the Yangtze River Delta

Author

Listed:
  • Siyu Zhu

    (School of Business, Jiangsu Open University, Nanjing 210036, China)

  • Ying Ding

    (School of Environmental Science, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing 211171, China)

  • Run Pan

    (School of Environmental Science, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing 211171, China)

  • Aifang Ding

    (School of Environmental Science, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing 211171, China)

Abstract

The Yangtze River Delta is the most populous and economically active region in China. Studying the reduction in CO 2 emissions in this region is of great significance in achieving the goal of “peak carbon and carbon neutrality” in China. In this study, the Tapio decoupling and extended STIRPAT models were used to study the differences in provincial CO 2 emissions characteristics and influencing factors in the Yangtze River Delta from 2001 to 2019. The results show that the growth rate of CO 2 emissions was slower than that of economic development, which means that CO 2 emissions and economic growth were in a state of weak decoupling. As found by ridge regression, the same factor has different impacts on CO 2 emissions among provinces. The differences in these influencing factors were mainly caused by the imbalance of development in the Yangtze River Delta. Nine development scenarios were set out to predict the future trend of CO 2 emissions based on economic development and carbon emissions technology using the extended STIRPAT model. It was found that low-carbon-emissions technology is conducive to controlling CO 2 emissions in the Yangtze River Delta. In that case, the CO 2 emissions would peak in 2029 at 1895.78~1908.25 Mt. Compared with the low-carbon-emissions scenarios, both the medium- and high-carbon-emissions scenarios are not conducive to achieving a carbon peak, with a 2~5-year delay in peak time and increasing emissions by 3.69~7.68%. In order to reduce the Yangtze River Delta’s CO 2 emissions and pass the peak emissions as soon as possible, it is essential to not only optimize the energy structure, upgrade industries and promote the coordinated development of low-carbon technologies, but also promote emissions reduction in the transportation and construction fields and advocate for a low-carbon lifestyle among the public.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyu Zhu & Ying Ding & Run Pan & Aifang Ding, 2023. "Analysis of Interprovincial Differences in CO 2 Emissions and Peak Prediction in the Yangtze River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6474-:d:1120720
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6474/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6474/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chenguang Sun & Bo Miao & Miaochao Chen, 2022. "Performance Evaluation of Reducing Consumption of Energy in the Yangtze River Delta under the Background of Low-Carbon Economy," Journal of Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-12, March.
    2. Huibin Zeng & Bilin Shao & Genqing Bian & Hongbin Dai & Fangyu Zhou, 2022. "Analysis of Influencing Factors and Trend Forecast of CO 2 Emission in Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-30, January.
    3. Richard York & Eugene A. Rosa & Thomas Dietz, 2004. "The Ecological Footprint Intensity of National Economies," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 8(4), pages 139-154, October.
    4. K. Farmer & K.W. Steininger, 1999. "Reducing CO2-Emissions Under Fiscal Retrenchment: A Multi-Cohort CGE-Model for Austria," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 13(3), pages 309-340, April.
    5. Xiao, Huijuan & Duan, Zhiyuan & Zhou, Ya & Zhang, Ning & Shan, Yuli & Lin, Xiyan & Liu, Guosheng, 2019. "CO2 emission patterns in shrinking and growing cities: A case study of Northeast China and the Yangtze River Delta," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    6. York, Richard & Rosa, Eugene A. & Dietz, Thomas, 2003. "STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 351-365, October.
    7. Wang, Ping & Wu, Wanshui & Zhu, Bangzhu & Wei, Yiming, 2013. "Examining the impact factors of energy-related CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model in Guangdong Province, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 65-71.
    8. Wei Li & Qing-Xiang Ou, 2013. "Decomposition of China’s Carbon Emissions Intensity from 1995 to 2010: An Extended Kaya Identity," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-7, December.
    9. Ji Han & Jiabin Liu, 2018. "Urban Spatial Interaction Analysis Using Inter-City Transport Big Data: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ling Xiong & Shaozhou Qi, 2018. "Financial Development And Carbon Emissions In Chinese Provinces: A Spatial Panel Data Analysis," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 63(02), pages 447-464, March.
    2. Roula Inglesi-Lotz & Luis Diez del Corral Morales, 2017. "The Effect of Education on a Country’s Energy Consumption: Evidence from Developed and Developing Countries," Working Papers 201733, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    3. Wang, Yuan & Zhang, Xiang & Kubota, Jumpei & Zhu, Xiaodong & Lu, Genfa, 2015. "A semi-parametric panel data analysis on the urbanization-carbon emissions nexus for OECD countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 704-709.
    4. Weibo Zhao & Dongxiao Niu, 2017. "Prediction of CO 2 Emission in China’s Power Generation Industry with Gauss Optimized Cuckoo Search Algorithm and Wavelet Neural Network Based on STIRPAT model with Ridge Regression," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Zhaohua Li & Ziwei Fang & Zhuyu Tang, 2020. "Effects of Imports and Exports on China's PM2.5 Pollution," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 28(6), pages 28-50, November.
    6. Bo Yang & Minhaj Ali & Shujahat Haider Hashmi & Mohsin Shabir, 2020. "Income Inequality and CO 2 Emissions in Developing Countries: The Moderating Role of Financial Instability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-24, August.
    7. Fei Wang & Zhi Dong & Jichang Dong, 2023. "Assessment of the Drivers and Effects of International Science and Technology Cooperation in Xinjiang in the Context of the Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Minda Ma & Liyin Shen & Hong Ren & Weiguang Cai & Zhili Ma, 2017. "How to Measure Carbon Emission Reduction in China’s Public Building Sector: Retrospective Decomposition Analysis Based on STIRPAT Model in 2000–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Liang, Xiaoying & Min Fan, & Xiao, Yuting & Yao, Jing, 2022. "Temporal-spatial characteristics of energy-based carbon dioxide emissions and driving factors during 2004–2019, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    10. Xie, Rui & Fang, Jiayu & Liu, Cenjie, 2017. "The effects of transportation infrastructure on urban carbon emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 199-207.
    11. Maxwell Chukwudi Udeagha & Nicholas Ngepah, 2022. "Dynamic ARDL Simulations Effects of Fiscal Decentralization, Green Technological Innovation, Trade Openness, and Institutional Quality on Environmental Sustainability: Evidence from South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-35, August.
    12. Decai Tang & Yan Zhang & Brandon J. Bethel, 2019. "An Analysis of Disparities and Driving Factors of Carbon Emissions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, April.
    13. Wang, Shaojian & Wang, Jieyu & Fang, Chuanglin & Feng, Kuishuang, 2019. "Inequalities in carbon intensity in China: A multi-scalar and multi-mechanism analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    14. Haitao Zheng & Jie Hu & Rong Guan & Shanshan Wang, 2016. "Examining Determinants of CO 2 Emissions in 73 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Liquan Xu & Yong Geng & Dong Wu & Chenyi Zhang & Shijiang Xiao, 2021. "Carbon Footprint of Residents’ Housing Consumption and Its Driving Forces in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Amirmohsen Behjat & Mohammad Hassan Tarazkar, 2021. "Investigating the factors affecting the ecological well-being performance in Iran from 1994 to 2014," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 13871-13889, September.
    17. Li, Ke & Lin, Boqiang, 2015. "Impacts of urbanization and industrialization on energy consumption/CO2 emissions: Does the level of development matter?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1107-1122.
    18. Vélez-Henao, Johan-Andrés & Font Vivanco, David & Hernández-Riveros, Jesús-Antonio, 2019. "Technological change and the rebound effect in the STIRPAT model: A critical view," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1372-1381.
    19. Bo Li & Xuejing Liu & Zhenhong Li, 2015. "Using the STIRPAT model to explore the factors driving regional CO 2 emissions: a case of Tianjin, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 76(3), pages 1667-1685, April.
    20. Wang, Shaojian & Zeng, Jingyuan & Liu, Xiaoping, 2019. "Examining the multiple impacts of technological progress on CO2 emissions in China: A panel quantile regression approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 140-150.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6474-:d:1120720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.