IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p6182-d1115438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Framework of 17 Hydrological Ecosystem Services (HESS17) for Supporting River Basin Planning and Environmental Monitoring

Author

Listed:
  • Lan Thanh Ha

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands
    Institute of Water Resources Planning, 162A Tran Quang Khai, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Wim G. M. Bastiaanssen

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands
    IrriWatch, Agro Business Park 10, 6708 PW Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Gijs W. H. Simons

    (FutureWater, Costerweg 1V, 6702 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Ate Poortinga

    (SERVIR-Mekong, 979/69 Paholyothin Road, Samsen Nai Phayathai, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
    Spatial Informatics Group, 2529 Yolanda Ct., Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA)

Abstract

Hydrological ecosystem services (HESS) describe the benefits of water for multiple purposes with an emphasis on environmental values. The value of HESS is often not realized because primary benefits (e.g., food production, water withdrawals) get the most attention. Secondary benefits such as water storage, purification or midday temperature cooling are often overlooked. This results in an incorrect evaluation of beneficial water usage in urban and rural resettlements and misunderstandings when land use changes are introduced. The objective of this paper is to propose a standard list of 17 HESS indicators that are in line with the policy and philosophy of the Consultative Group of International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and that are measurable with earth observation technologies in conjunction with GIS and hydrological models. The HESS17 framework considered indicators that can be directly related to water flows, water fluxes and water stocks; they have a natural characteristic with minimal anthropogenic influence and must be quantifiable by means of earth observation models in combination with GIS and hydrological models. The introduction of a HESS framework is less meaningful without proper quantification procedures in place. Because of the widely diverging management options, the role of water should be categorized as (i) consumptive use (i.e., evapotranspiration and dry matter production) and (ii) non-consumptive use (stream flow, recharge, water storage). Governments and responsible agencies for integrated water management should recognize the need to include HESS17 in water allocation policies, water foot-printing, water accounting, transboundary water management, food security purposes and spatial land-use planning processes. The proposed HESS17 framework and associated methods can be used to evaluate land, soil and water conservation programs. This paper presents a framework that is non-exhaustive but can be realistically computed and applicable across spatial scales.

Suggested Citation

  • Lan Thanh Ha & Wim G. M. Bastiaanssen & Gijs W. H. Simons & Ate Poortinga, 2023. "A New Framework of 17 Hydrological Ecosystem Services (HESS17) for Supporting River Basin Planning and Environmental Monitoring," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-26, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6182-:d:1115438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6182/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6182/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bastiaanssen, W.G.M. & Allen, R.G. & Droogers, P. & D'Urso, G. & Steduto, P., 2007. "Twenty-five years modeling irrigated and drained soils: State of the art," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 111-125, September.
    2. Cheema, M.J.M. & Bastiaanssen, W.G.M., 2010. "Land use and land cover classification in the irrigated Indus Basin using growth phenology information from satellite data to support water management analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(10), pages 1541-1552, October.
    3. Tim Hessels & Jeffrey C. Davids & Wim Bastiaanssen, 2022. "Scalable Water Balances from Earth Observations (SWEO): results from 50 years of remote sensing in hydrology," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(6), pages 866-886, August.
    4. McCartney, Matthew. & Cai, Xueliang. & Smakhtin, Vladimir., 2013. "Evaluating the flow regulating functions of natural ecosystems in the Zambezi River Basin," IWMI Research Reports H045844, International Water Management Institute.
    5. Willaarts, Bárbara A. & Volk, Martin & Aguilera, Pedro A., 2012. "Assessing the ecosystem services supplied by freshwater flows in Mediterranean agroecosystems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 21-31.
    6. Elahi, Ehsan & Khalid, Zainab & Tauni, Muhammad Zubair & Zhang, Hongxia & Lirong, Xing, 2022. "Extreme weather events risk to crop-production and the adaptation of innovative management strategies to mitigate the risk: A retrospective survey of rural Punjab, Pakistan," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    7. Bagstad, Kenneth J. & Johnson, Gary W. & Voigt, Brian & Villa, Ferdinando, 2013. "Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 117-125.
    8. Costanza, Robert, 1998. "The value of ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 1-2, April.
    9. Elahi, Ehsan & Khalid, Zainab & Zhang, Zhixin, 2022. "Understanding farmers’ intention and willingness to install renewable energy technology: A solution to reduce the environmental emissions of agriculture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    10. Simons, G.W.H. & Bastiaanssen, W.G.M. & Cheema, M.J.M. & Ahmad, B. & Immerzeel, W.W., 2020. "A novel method to quantify consumed fractions and non-consumptive use of irrigation water: Application to the Indus Basin Irrigation System of Pakistan," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    11. Lan Thanh Ha & Wim G. M. Bastiaanssen, 2023. "Determination of Spatially-Distributed Hydrological Ecosystem Services (HESS) in the Red River Delta Using a Calibrated SWAT Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, April.
    12. Perry, Chris & Steduto, Pasquale & Allen, Richard. G. & Burt, Charles M., 2009. "Increasing productivity in irrigated agriculture: Agronomic constraints and hydrological realities," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1517-1524, November.
    13. Grizzetti, B. & Lanzanova, D. & Liquete, C. & Reynaud, A. & Cardoso, A.C., 2016. "Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 194-203.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lan Thanh Ha & Wim G. M. Bastiaanssen, 2023. "Determination of Spatially-Distributed Hydrological Ecosystem Services (HESS) in the Red River Delta Using a Calibrated SWAT Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhaoxue Gai & Ying Xu & Guoming Du, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Differentiation and Driving Factors of Carbon Storage in Cultivated Land-Use Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Du Peng & Ehsan Elahi & Zainab Khalid, 2023. "Productive Service Agglomeration, Human Capital Level, and Urban Economic Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Huitao Shen & Tao Zhang & Yanxia Zhao & Aibin Wu & Zhenhua Zheng & Jiansheng Cao, 2023. "Effects of Precipitation Variation on Annual and Winter Soil Respiration in a Semiarid Mountain Shrubland in Northern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Yan Zhao & Ehsan Elahi & Zainab Khalid & Xuegang Sun & Fang Sun, 2023. "Environmental, Social and Governance Performance: Analysis of CEO Power and Corporate Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Min Zhu & Mengqi Sun & Ehsan Elahi & Yajie Li & Zainab Khalid, 2023. "Analyzing the Relationship between Green Finance and Agricultural Industrial Upgrading: A Panel Data Study of 31 Provinces in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Vorstius, Anne Carolin & Spray, Christopher J., 2015. "A comparison of ecosystem services mapping tools for their potential to support planning and decision-making on a local scale," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 75-83.
    7. Wenxiang Peng & Yutao Lei & Xuan Zhang, 2023. "Analysis of China’s High-Carbon Manufacturing Industry’s Carbon Emissions in the Digital Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-35, October.
    8. Min Zhu & Yajie Li & Zainab Khalid & Ehsan Elahi, 2023. "Comprehensive Evaluation and Promotion Strategy of Agricultural Digitalization Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    9. Lin, Jingyu & Huang, Jinliang & Hadjikakou, Michalis & Huang, Yaling & Li, Kun & Bryan, Brett A., 2021. "Reframing water-related ecosystem services flows," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    10. Xiuli Cui & Ehsan Elahi & Zainab Khalid & Bo Xu, 2022. "Environmental Regulation, Manufacturing Technological Progress and Pollution Emissions: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Wei Wang & Ehsan Elahi & Shiying Sun & Xiaoqing Tong & Zhaosen Zhang & Mohammad Ilyas Abro, 2023. "Factors Influencing Water Use Efficiency in Agriculture: A Case Study of Shaanxi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    12. Xingshuai Wang & Ehsan Elahi & Zainab Khalid & Mohammad Ilyas Abro, 2023. "Environmental Governance Goals of Local Governments and Technological Innovation of Enterprises under Green Performance Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Changsong Oh, 2024. "Characteristics and Reduction of Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) Emissions during the Construction of Urban Parks in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, April.
    14. Yihao Cao & Ehsan Elahi & Zainab Khalid & Ping Li & Pengsheng Sun, 2023. "How Do Intellectual Property Rights Affect Green Technological Innovation? Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    15. Shaeden Gokool & Maqsooda Mahomed & Richard Kunz & Alistair Clulow & Mbulisi Sibanda & Vivek Naiken & Kershani Chetty & Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, 2023. "Crop Monitoring in Smallholder Farms Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles to Facilitate Precision Agriculture Practices: A Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    16. Pingan Xiang & Jian Guo, 2023. "Understanding Farmers’ Intentions to Adopt Pest and Disease Green Control Techniques: Comparison and Integration Based on Multiple Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Xiaolong Gao & Changfei Li & Ehsan Elahi & Mohammad Ilyas Abro & Zhaocai Cui, 2023. "Technological Innovation, Product Quality and Upgrading of Manufacturing Value Chain: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, April.
    18. Hanan A. Jafar & Isam Shahrour & Hussein Mroueh, 2023. "Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Conflict Areas: Application to Palestine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Yanzi Wang & Chunming Wu & Yongfeng Gong & Zhen Zhu, 2021. "Can Adaptive Governance Promote Coupling Social-Ecological Systems? Evidence from the Vulnerable Ecological Region of Northwestern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Wang, Han & Tian, Fuan & Wu, Jianxian & Nie, Xin, 2023. "Is China forest landscape restoration (FLR) worth it? A cost-benefit analysis and non-equilibrium ecological view," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6182-:d:1115438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.