IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p5857-d1109446.html

Prioritization of Waste-to-Energy Technologies Associated with the Utilization of Food Waste

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia Torres-Lozada

    (Study and Control of Environmental Pollution—ECCA Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad del Valle, Cali 760001, Colombia)

  • Pablo Manyoma-Velásquez

    (Logistic and Production (LOGYPRO) Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad del Valle, Cali 760001, Colombia)

  • Jenny Fabiana Gaviria-Cuevas

    (Logistic and Production (LOGYPRO) Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad del Valle, Cali 760001, Colombia)

Abstract

Taking advantage of the growing production of organic waste for its conversion to waste-to-energy (WtE) also contributes to mitigating the problems associated with its final disposal, which is a global trend of increasing application. This work presents an innovative approach for the identification and prioritization of WtE alternatives available from the use of food waste (FW) present in the municipal solid waste (MSW) of a Colombian municipality with source separation and selective collection: (i) a systematic literature review, which allows one to identify WtE alternatives; (ii) the prospective MIC-MAC method (Matrice d’Impacts Croisés Multiplication Appliqués à un Classement) allowed the selection of criteria and sub criteria; (iii) the analytical hierarchical process (AHP) and the technique of order of preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS), allowed a ranking of selected alternatives considering the technical, environmental, and social aspects. The WtE technologies identified were anaerobic digestion, gasification, incineration, biogas recovery from landfills, and pyrolysis; this last was excluded due to its greater application potential with substrates such as plastic waste. The six sub-criteria identified and prioritized were social acceptability (36%), greenhouse gas emissions mitigated (16.17%), MSW reduction (15.83%), energy production (13.80%), technological maturity (12.95%), and electrical energy conversion efficiency (5.25%), with the decreasing order of preferences of anaerobic digestion (78.2%), gasification (47.5%), incineration (27.4%), and biogas recovery from landfills (6.6%); the latter was the least desirable alternative (lower social acceptance and CO 2 tons mitigated in relation to the other options). The innovative nature of this study is the identification and consideration of the comprehensive management of this type of waste of a large number of criteria (120 environmental, 52 social, and 59 technical) and the validation of the results through a sensitivity analysis, which allowed us to confirm for this study, that anaerobic digestion is the most favorable technology for the treatment and energy use of FW.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia Torres-Lozada & Pablo Manyoma-Velásquez & Jenny Fabiana Gaviria-Cuevas, 2023. "Prioritization of Waste-to-Energy Technologies Associated with the Utilization of Food Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5857-:d:1109446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5857/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5857/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali Akbar Barati & Hossein Azadi & Milad Dehghani Pour & Philippe Lebailly & Mostafa Qafori, 2019. "Determining Key Agricultural Strategic Factors Using AHP-MICMAC," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Dastjerdi, B. & Strezov, V. & Kumar, R. & Behnia, M., 2019. "An evaluation of the potential of waste to energy technologies for residual solid waste in New South Wales, Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. Longsheng, Cheng & Ali Shah, Syed Ahsan & Solangi, Yasir Ahmed & Ahmad, Munir & Ali, Sharafat, 2022. "An integrated SWOT-multi-criteria analysis of implementing sustainable waste-to-energy in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1438-1453.
    4. Alberto Benato & Alarico Macor, 2017. "Biogas Engine Waste Heat Recovery Using Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Alao, Moshood Akanni & Popoola, Olawale M. & Ayodele, Temitope Rapheal, 2021. "Selection of waste-to-energy technology for distributed generation using IDOCRIW-Weighted TOPSIS method: A case study of the City of Johannesburg, South Africa," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 162-183.
    6. Wallerand, Anna S. & Kermani, Maziar & Voillat, Régis & Kantor, Ivan & Maréchal, François, 2018. "Optimal design of solar-assisted industrial processes considering heat pumping: Case study of a dairy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PB), pages 565-585.
    7. Getahun, T. & Nigusie, A. & Entele, T. & Gerven, T. Van & Bruggen, B. Van der, 2012. "Effect of turning frequencies on composting biodegradable municipal solid waste quality," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 79-84.
    8. Mine Isik & Özay Özaydın & Şule Önsel Ekici & Y. Ilker Topcu, 2022. "Analyzing the Interaction of Renewable Energy Penetration with the Wealth of Nations Using Bayesian Nets," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Y. Ilker Topcu & Şule Önsel Ekici & Özgür Kabak & Emel Aktas & Özay Özaydın (ed.), New Perspectives in Operations Research and Management Science, pages 527-550, Springer.
    9. Roos, Ernst & den Hertog, Dick, 2021. "A distributionally robust analysis of the program evaluation and review technique," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(3), pages 918-928.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Najafi, Fatemeh & Kazemi, Mostafa & Mostafaeipour, Ali & Mishra, Phoolenrda, 2025. "Prioritizing industrial wastes and technologies for bioenergy production: Case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    2. Sangseop Lim & Chang-Hee Lee & Jae-Hwan Bae & Young-Hun Jeon, 2024. "Identifying the Optimal Valuation Model for Maritime Data Assets with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gambade, Julien & Noël, Hervé & Glouannec, Patrick & Magueresse, Anthony, 2023. "Numerical model of intermittent solar hot water production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    2. Jodlbauer, Herbert & Tripathi, Shailesh & Brunner, Manuel & Bachmann, Nadine, 2022. "Stability of cross impact matrices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    3. Alberto Benato & Chiara D’Alpaos & Alarico Macor, 2022. "Possible Ways of Extending the Biogas Plants Lifespan after the Feed-In Tariff Expiration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Kristóf Kummer & Attila R. Imre, 2021. "Seasonal and Multi-Seasonal Energy Storage by Power-to-Methane Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, June.
    5. Jaime A. Mesa & Carlos Fúquene-Retamoso & Aníbal Maury-Ramírez, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment on Construction and Demolition Waste: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Lombardi, Pio Alessandro & Wasser, Hannes Peter & Pantaleo, Antonio Marco, 2024. "Flexibility exploitation in Net-Zero Energy Factories. A technical and economic study case for dairy systems located in Central and South Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    7. Sandylove Afrane & Jeffrey Dankwa Ampah & Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Prince Oppong Amoh & Abdulfatah Abdu Yusuf & Islam Md Rizwanul Fattah & Ebenezer Agbozo & Elmazeg Elgamli & Mokhtar Shouran & Guozhu M, 2022. "Integrated AHP-TOPSIS under a Fuzzy Environment for the Selection of Waste-To-Energy Technologies in Ghana: A Performance Analysis and Socio-Enviro-Economic Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-31, July.
    8. Ferdoush, Md. Ruhul & Aziz, Ridwan Al & Karmaker, Chitra Lekha & Debnath, Binoy & Limon, Mohammad Hossain & Bari, A.B.M. Mainul, 2024. "Unraveling the challenges of waste-to-energy transition in emerging economies: Implications for sustainability," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(2).
    9. Tilahun, Fitsum Bekele & Bhandari, Ramchandra & Mamo, Mengesha, 2019. "Design optimization and control approach for a solar-augmented industrial heating," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 186-198.
    10. Martínez-Rodríguez, Guillermo & Fuentes-Silva, Amanda L. & Velázquez-Torres, Daniel & Picón-Núñez, Martín, 2022. "Comprehensive solar thermal integration for industrial processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    11. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    12. Ali Akbar Barati & Hossein Azadi & Saghi Movahhed Moghaddam & Jürgen Scheffran & Milad Dehghani Pour, 2024. "Agricultural expansion and its impacts on climate change: evidence from Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 5089-5115, February.
    13. Akbari, Zahra & Imani, Bahram & Pourramzan, Eisa & Choobchian, Shahla & Siamian, Narges & Sklenička, Petr & Janečková, Kristina & Witlox, Frank & Azadi, Hossein, 2025. "How to protect productive lands to ensure food security: The case of Northern Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    14. Aleksandra Bączkiewicz & Bartłomiej Kizielewicz & Andrii Shekhovtsov & Mykhailo Yelmikheiev & Volodymyr Kozlov & Wojciech Sałabun, 2021. "Comparative Analysis of Solar Panels with Determination of Local Significance Levels of Criteria Using the MCDM Methods Resistant to the Rank Reversal Phenomenon," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    15. Alyamani, Rakan & Solangi, Yasir Ahmed & Almakhles, Dhafer, 2025. "Assessing factors and resilience strategies for sustainable energy transition in Saudi Arabia: An integrated SWOT-TOWS analysis and decision-making framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    16. Behnam Hosseini Dastjerdi & Vladimir Strezov & Ravinder Kumar & Masud Behnia, 2021. "Economic Feasibility and Sustainability Assessment of Residual Municipal Solid Waste Management Scenarios in NSW, Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-12, August.
    17. Itzel Inti Maria Donati & Davide Viaggi & Zorica Srdjevic & Bojan Srdjevic & Antonella Di Fonzo & Teresa Del Giudice & Orlando Cimino & Andrea Martelli & Anna Dalla Marta & Roberto Henke & Filiberto A, 2023. "An Analysis of Preference Weights and Setting Priorities by Irrigation Advisory Services Users Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, August.
    18. Mat Nawi, Z. & Kamarudin, S.K. & Sheikh Abdullah, S.R. & Lam, S.S., 2019. "The potential of exhaust waste heat recovery (WHR) from marine diesel engines via organic rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 17-31.
    19. Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Rostom, Madona & Malmir, Behnam & Yazdani, Morteza & Suh, Sangwon & Heidrich, Oliver, 2022. "Integrating life cycle assessment and multi criteria decision making for sustainable waste management: Key issues and recommendations for future studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    20. Meraj, Md & Mahmood, S.M. & Khan, M.E. & Azhar, Md & Tiwari, G.N., 2021. "Effect of N-Photovoltaic thermal integrated parabolic concentrator on milk temperature for pasteurization: A simulation study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 2153-2164.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5857-:d:1109446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.