IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p4969-d1093868.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Synergies of Lean, BIM, and Extended Reality (LBX) for Project Delivery Management

Author

Listed:
  • Sepehr Alizadehsalehi

    (Project Management Program, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208-3109, USA)

  • Ahmad Hadavi

    (Project Management Program, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208-3109, USA)

Abstract

The architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry stands to benefit tremendously from the integration of lean construction (LC), building information modeling (BIM), and extended reality (XR) technologies at all stages of a project. These technologies enable multidimensional content viewing and collaboration through cloud-based systems and in real-scale environments, resulting in higher levels of efficiency. The aim of this research is to offer an integrative approach that combines project management philosophies, systems, technologies, and tools. The sections containing the results of this study are as follows. (1) A concise review of the benefits of LC, BIM, and XR technologies in the AEC industry, including BIM-based visualization support for LC (Lean-BIM) and BIM visualization in XR (BIM-XR). This section also presents an overview of the most commonly used wearable XRs on the market. (2) The presentation of an LBX process flow diagram and an IDEF0 diagram for the LBX project delivery management system at each stage of AEC projects, including design, construction, and operation. (3) Two possible scenarios for integrated lean, BIM, and XR implementation are suggested, referred to as “in the office” and “online or semi-online LBX meetings”. (4) An analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the LBX management system, practical implications, and open challenges of applying LBX to project management tasks. Overall, this study presents an enormous opportunity to increase the quality of construction project planning, understanding, and performance, and provides a roadmap for future efforts to implement the integration of LC, BIM, and XR technologies in the AEC industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Sepehr Alizadehsalehi & Ahmad Hadavi, 2023. "Synergies of Lean, BIM, and Extended Reality (LBX) for Project Delivery Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-27, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4969-:d:1093868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4969/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4969/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohamed Marzouk & Ahmed Elmaraghy, 2021. "Design for Deconstruction Using Integrated Lean Principles and BIM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Bilal Manzoor & Idris Othman & Juan Carlos Pomares, 2021. "Digital Technologies in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) Industry—A Bibliometric—Qualitative Literature Review of Research Activities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Hicks, B.J., 2007. "Lean information management: Understanding and eliminating waste," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 233-249.
    4. Anh Chi Phan & Ha Thu Nguyen & Hao Anh Nguyen & Yoshiki Matsui, 2019. "Effect of Total Quality Management Practices and JIT Production Practices on Flexibility Performance: Empirical Evidence from International Manufacturing Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Mohammad Iranmanesh & Suhaiza Zailani & Sunghyup Sean Hyun & Mohd Helmi Ali & Kwangyong Kim, 2019. "Impact of Lean Manufacturing Practices on Firms’ Sustainable Performance: Lean Culture as a Moderator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Houljakbe Houlteurbe Dagou & Asli Pelin Gurgun & Kerim Koc & Cenk Budayan, 2025. "The Future of Construction: Integrating Innovative Technologies for Smarter Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-29, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hazem Ali & Ting Chen & Yunhong Hao, 2021. "Sustainable Manufacturing Practices, Competitive Capabilities, and Sustainable Performance: Moderating Role of Environmental Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Gonçalves, M. & Figueiredo, A. & Almeida, R.M.S.F. & Vicente, R., 2024. "Dynamic façades in buildings: A systematic review across thermal comfort, energy efficiency and daylight performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Dr Emmanuel Mitaire Tarurhor & Dr Ochuko B. Emudainohwo, 2020. "LEAN Manufacturing and Firm Performance in the Palm-Oil Industries in Delta State, Nigeria," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 319-331.
    4. Sasha Shahbazi & Martin Kurdve & Mats Zackrisson & Christina Jönsson & Anna Runa Kristinsdottir, 2019. "Comparison of Four Environmental Assessment Tools in Swedish Manufacturing: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Luay Jum’a & Dominik Zimon & Muhammad Ikram, 2021. "A Relationship between Supply Chain Practices, Environmental Sustainability and Financial Performance: Evidence from Manufacturing Companies in Jordan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Kim, Changsu & Oh, Eunhae & Shin, Namchul & Chae, Myungsin, 2009. "An empirical investigation of factors affecting ubiquitous computing use and U-business value," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 436-448.
    7. Jum'a, Luay & Zimon, Dominik & Ikram, Muhammad & Madzík, Peter, 2022. "Towards a sustainability paradigm; the nexus between lean green practices, sustainability-oriented innovation and Triple Bottom Line," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    8. Serhan Alshammari & Mohamed Aichouni & Naim Ben Ali & Omar S. Alshammari & Fatimah Alfaraj & Ahmed Baha Eddine Aichouni, 2025. "Impact of Total Quality Management and Lean Manufacturing on Sustainability Performance: An SEM-ANN Approach in Saudi Food Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-34, March.
    9. Matteo Ferrazzi & Guilherme Luz Tortorella & Wen Li & Federica Costa & Alberto Portioli-Staudacher, 2025. "From People to Performance: Leveraging Soft Lean Practices for Environmental Sustainability in Large-Scale Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-24, April.
    10. Sambo Lyson Zulu & Ali M. Saad, 2023. "A Sensemaking Perspective of Digitalisation in Construction Organisations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    11. Vijayabanu C. & Karthikeyan S. & Vijay Surya P., 2022. "Total quality management practices and its impact on Indian construction projects," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 2697-2709, January.
    12. Amal Benkarim & Daniel Imbeau, 2021. "Organizational Commitment and Lean Sustainability: Literature Review and Directions for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, March.
    13. Soomro, Zahoor Ahmed & Shah, Mahmood Hussain & Ahmed, Javed, 2016. "Information security management needs more holistic approach: A literature review," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 215-225.
    14. Salih Aka & Selahattin Yavuz, 2025. "Investigating the Adoption Barriers of Total Quality Management in Production with DEMATEL," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 9289-9312, June.
    15. Radosław Wolniak, 2019. "The Level of Maturity of Quality Management Systems in Poland—Results of Empirical Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Aawag Mohsen Alawag & Wesam Salah Alaloul & M. S. Liew & Abdullah O. Baarimah & Muhammad Ali Musarat & Al-Baraa Abdulrahman Al-Mekhlafi, 2023. "The Role of the Total-Quality-Management (TQM) Drivers in Overcoming the Challenges of Implementing TQM in Industrialized-Building-System (IBS) Projects in Malaysia: Experts’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    17. Manuel Cabaleiro & Borja Conde & Cristina González-Gaya & Brais Barros, 2023. "Removable, Reconfigurable, and Sustainable Steel Structures: A State-of-the-Art Review of Clamp-Based Steel Connections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    18. Veiga, Gabriela Lobo & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Frega, José Roberto & Gouvea da Costa, Sérgio Eduardo, 2021. "A DEA-based approach to assess manufacturing performance through operations strategy lenses," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    19. Bambang Santoso & Tota Pirdo Kasih, 2024. "Green Lean Concept for Measurement of Sustainable Performance Mediated by Organizational Culture in Oil & Gas and Petrochemical Industry," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 88-100, September.
    20. Hanzhang Zhan & Bon‐Gang Hwang & Lim Wei Hern Jovan, 2025. "Barriers and Strategies in Implementing Design for Disassembly and Adaptability Principles in Singapore: A Pathway to Circular Economy in the Construction Industry," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 3858-3878, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4969-:d:1093868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.