IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4406-d1084807.html

Transboundary Fisheries Management in Kavango–Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area (KAZA-TFCA): Prospects and Dilemmas

Author

Listed:
  • Imikendu Imbwae

    (Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science (DIFS), Rhodes University, Makhanda 6140, South Africa
    Department of Fisheries, Choma P.O. Box 630450, Zambia)

  • Shankar Aswani

    (Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science (DIFS), Rhodes University, Makhanda 6140, South Africa
    Department of Anthropology, Rhodes University, Makhanda 6140, South Africa)

  • Warwick Sauer

    (Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science (DIFS), Rhodes University, Makhanda 6140, South Africa)

  • Clinton Hay

    (Namibia Nature Foundation, Windhoek 10005, Namibia
    Environmental Sciences, University of Namibia, Windhoek 13301, Namibia)

Abstract

Inland fisheries in the Kavango–Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area (KAZA-TFCA) offer food security to the riverine communities across the region. They also contribute towards the attainment of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals 1 and 15, which aim to alleviate poverty and maintain biodiversity conservation. Despite this significant role, the fisheries have suffered severe declines in the previous decades due to multiple factors, such as overfishing and poor legislation. Furthermore, climate change is exerting pressure by altering the ecology and productivity of the river systems. The unprecedented challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic have further constrained management efforts. Attempts to address these challenges have pointed towards transboundary fisheries management as a silver bullet in moving towards sustainable fisheries management. However, the implementation of this strategy in the region has encountered numerous roadblocks, thereby subjecting the river ecosystem to a wider environmental threat, with dire consequences on livelihoods. This paper reviews existing management and governance structures together with key informant interviews to elicit primary and secondary data essential for management at the regional level. The study identifies conflicting regulations, and inadequate policies and institutions across the region as major bottlenecks affecting the successful implementation of transboundary fisheries management. Finally, the paper offers some suggestions for the improvement of fisheries management in the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Imikendu Imbwae & Shankar Aswani & Warwick Sauer & Clinton Hay, 2023. "Transboundary Fisheries Management in Kavango–Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area (KAZA-TFCA): Prospects and Dilemmas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4406-:d:1084807
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4406/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4406/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jentoft, Svein & McCay, Bonnie, 1995. "User participation in fisheries management: lessons drawn from international experiences," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 227-246, May.
    2. Mariana Rivera-Torres & Andrea K. Gerlak, 2021. "Evolving together: transboundary water governance in the Colorado River Basin," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 553-574, December.
    3. Dugan, Patrick & Dey, Madan M. & Sugunan, V.V., 2006. "Fisheries and water productivity in tropical river basins: Enhancing food security and livelihoods by managing water for fish," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 80(1-3), pages 262-275, February.
    4. repec:rza:wpaper:170 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Madzudzo, E. & Mulanda, A. & Nagoli, J. & Lunda, J. & Ratner, B.D., 2013. "A Governance analysis of the Barotse Floodplain System, Zambia: Identifying obstacles and opportunities," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 40302, April.
    6. Britta Hackenberg & Clinton Hay & Jamie Robertsen & Caitlin Blaser Mapitsa, 2022. "Namibian Experiences Establishing Community Fish Reserves," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
    7. Nobuhle Ndhlovu & Osamu Saito & Riyanti Djalante & Nobuyuki Yagi, 2017. "Assessing the Sensitivity of Small-Scale Fishery Groups to Climate Change in Lake Kariba, Zimbabwe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, November.
    8. WorldFish Center, 2007. "Proceedings of the international workshop on the fisheries of the Zambezi Basin," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 37291, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chaterina Agusta Paulus & Akhmad Fauzi & Damianus Adar, 2023. "Analyzing Community Perception of Protected Areas to Effectively Mitigate Environmental Risks Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis: The Case of Savu Sea National Marine Park, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Imikendu Imbwae & Shankar Aswani & Warwick Sauer, 2023. "Socio-Economic and Environmental Challenges of Small-Scale Fisheries: Prognosis for Sustainable Fisheries Management in Lake Kariba, Zambia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Bailey, Jennifer, 2016. "Adventures in cross-disciplinary studies: Grand strategy and fisheries management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 18-27.
    3. Olson, Julia & Clay, Patricia M. & Pinto da Silva, Patricia, 2014. "Putting the seafood in sustainable food systems," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 104-111.
    4. Parés, Claudio & Dresdner, Jorge & Salgado, Hugo, 2015. "Who should set the total allowable catch? Social preferences and legitimacy in fisheries management institutions," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 36-43.
    5. Thomas, Alyssa S. & Milfont, Taciano L. & Gavin, Michael C., 2015. "What determines fishers’ knowledge of and attitudes towards regulations? A case study from the Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 547-554.
    6. Yates, K.L., 2014. "View from the wheelhouse: Perceptions on marine management from the fishing community and suggestions for improvement," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 39-50.
    7. Omukuti, Jessica, 2020. "Challenging the obsession with local level institutions in country ownership of climate change adaptation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    8. Laura E. McCann & Jeffrey D. Michler & Maybin Mwangala & Osaretin Olurotimi & Natalia Estrada Carmona, 2024. "Food Without Fire: Nutritional and Environmental Impacts from a Solar Stove Field Experiment," Papers 2410.02075, arXiv.org.
    9. Aaron Hatcher & Daniel Gordon, 2005. "Further Investigations into the Factors Affecting Compliance with U.K. Fishing Quotas," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 81(1).
    10. Sopha Lieng & Nobuyuki Yagi & Aimee Mori & Jay D. Hastings, 2018. "Savings-Group Improvements Contribute to Sustainable Community-Fisheries Management: A Case Study in Cambodia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Hossain, Istiaque & Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Siwar, Chamhuri & Bin Mokhtar, Mazlin, 2019. "Measurement of Water Productivity in Seasonal Floodplain Beel Area," SocArXiv q3ayc, Center for Open Science.
    12. Lucy Amigo-Dobaño & María Dolores Garza-Gil & Manuel M. Varela-Lafuente, 2020. "Analyzing the Attitudes of Spanish Firms towards Brexit’s Effects on the Management of European Fisheries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    13. McClenachan, Loren & O’Connor, Grace & Reynolds, Travis, 2015. "Adaptive capacity of co-management systems in the face of environmental change: The soft-shell clam fishery and invasive green crabs in Maine," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 26-32.
    14. Sydney Kapembwa & Alan Gardiner & Jόn G. Pétursson, 2020. "Governance assessment of small‐scale inland fishing: The case of Lake Itezhi‐Tezhi, Zambia," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(3), pages 236-254, August.
    15. Hanna, Susan S., 1999. "Strengthening governance of ocean fishery resources," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 275-286, November.
    16. Rahman, M.A. & Haque, S. & Sarma, P.K. m, 2012. "Socioeconomic impact of rice-cum-fish culture in a selected areas of Bangladesh," Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh Agricultural University Research System (BAURES), vol. 10.
    17. Erpeng Wang & Zhifeng Gao, 2017. "Chinese Consumer Quality Perception and Preference of Traditional Sustainable Rice Produced by the Integrated Rice–Fish System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Thakur, Amod K. & Mohanty, Rajeeb K. & Singh, Rajbir & Patil, Dhiraj U., 2015. "Enhancing water and cropping productivity through Integrated System of Rice Intensification (ISRI) with aquaculture and horticulture under rainfed conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 65-76.
    19. Mohammad Mojibul Hoque Mozumder & Mohammad Muslem Uddin & Petra Schneider & Mohammad Mahmudul Islam & Md. Mostafa Shamsuzzaman, 2018. "Fisheries-Based Ecotourism in Bangladesh: Potentials and Challenges," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Mohammad Mojibul Hoque Mozumder & Md. Abdul Wahab & Simo Sarkki & Petra Schneider & Mohammad Mahmudul Islam, 2018. "Enhancing Social Resilience of the Coastal Fishing Communities: A Case Study of Hilsa ( Tenualosa Ilisha H.) Fishery in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4406-:d:1084807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.