IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4110-d1079002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visualizing Equitable Housing: A Prototype for a Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Margaux Lespagnard

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Waldo Galle

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium
    VITO Nexus, Flemish Institute for Technical Research (VITO), 2400 Mol, Belgium)

  • Niels De Temmerman

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium)

Abstract

Many citizens, researchers, civil organizations, and policymakers strive for equitable housing. Changing demographics, rising housing prices, and material and energy crises all add to the complexity of that quest. Responding to it, even on a project scale, requires a holistic view. Yet practitioners often work in niches. In contrast, an overarching, interdisciplinary understanding of equitable housing by all stakeholders is expected to bring more sustainable and just housing. In the academic literature, researchers have already defined many criteria of what equitable housing can entail. Nevertheless, this knowledge does not seep through to practitioners who design and develop equitable housing projects. Therefore, this paper proposes a prototype for an equitable housing framework. This framework is designed to facilitate an open discussion between all stakeholders in a project. To develop this framework, an explorative literature study and fifteen semi-structured interviews resulted in a long list of 418 considerations for equitable housing. These considerations are socially, financially, and environmentally oriented. To structure the considerations, they were categorized into fifteen dimensions and visualized in a doughnut-like framework. The framework is designed to encourage users to vocalize their needs and intentions, and to trigger systemic insights. It directs them towards sustainable, social, and inclusive decisions, based on the needs of all stakeholders involved. Moreover, the equitable housing framework allows understanding and analysing their thought patterns and intentions.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaux Lespagnard & Waldo Galle & Niels De Temmerman, 2023. "Visualizing Equitable Housing: A Prototype for a Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-26, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4110-:d:1079002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4110/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4110/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chiara Battistoni & Carolina Giraldo Nohra & Silvia Barbero, 2019. "A Systemic Design Method to Approach Future Complex Scenarios and Research Towards Sustainability: A Holistic Diagnosis Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-30, August.
    2. Sanne Zwart, 2015. "Maintaining an Efficient and Equitable Housing Market in Belgium," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1208, OECD Publishing.
    3. Mulliner, Emma & Smallbone, Kieran & Maliene, Vida, 2013. "An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 270-279.
    4. Jung-A Park & Byungsook Choi, 2021. "Factors Affecting the Intention of Multi-Family House Residents to Age in Place in a Potential Naturally Occurring Retirement Community of Seoul in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Valentinas Podvezko & Ieva Ubarte & Arturas Kaklauskas, 2017. "MCDM Assessment of a Healthy and Safe Built Environment According to Sustainable Development Principles: A Practical Neighborhood Approach in Vilnius," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Suleyman Enes Hacibektasoglu & Bulent Mertoglu & Hakan Tozan, 2021. "Application of a Novel Hybrid f-SC Risk Analysis Method in the Paint Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Stéphanie Camaréna, 2021. "Engaging with Artificial Intelligence (AI) with a Bottom-Up Approach for the Purpose of Sustainability: Victorian Farmers Market Association, Melbourne Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    4. Constanta Urzeala & Veronica Popescu & Daniel Courteix & Georgeta Mitrache & Mihaela Roco & Silvia Teodorescu, 2021. "Barriers and Facilitators for the Romanian Older Adults in Enjoying Physical Activity Health-Related Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Gawlik Remigiusz & Głuszak Michał & Małkowska Agnieszka, 2017. "The Measurement of Housing Preferences in the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 31-43, June.
    6. Brain, Isabel & Prieto, Joaquin, 2021. "Understanding changes in the geography of opportunity over time: the case of Santiago, Chile," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 109915, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Ling Gai & Ying Jin & Binyuan Zhang, 2022. "An integrated method for hybrid distribution with estimation of demand matching degree," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 2782-2808, November.
    8. Murray, Alan T., 2021. "Contemporary optimization application through geographic information systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Dan Zang & Yumei Xie & Silvia Barbero & Amina Pereno, 2023. "How Does Systemic Design Facilitate the Sustainability Transition of Rural Communities? A Comparative Case Study between China and Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Dewita, Yulia & Yen, Barbara T.H. & Burke, Matthew, 2018. "The effect of transport cost on housing affordability: Experiences from the Bandung Metropolitan Area, Indonesia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 507-519.
    11. Suzaini Zaid, 2015. "Is Public Low-Cost Housing in Malaysia really affordable? Measuring Operational Affordability of Public Low-Cost Housing in Kuala Lumpur," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 2703638, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    12. Charoenkit, Sasima & Kumar, S., 2014. "Environmental sustainability assessment tools for low carbon and climate resilient low income housing settlements," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 509-525.
    13. Fawzia FARZANA, 2019. "Adoption of Affordability and Sustainability Issues in Slum Rehabilitation through PPP in Dhaka, Bangladesh," RAIS Journal for Social Sciences, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 3(2), pages 29-39, November.
    14. Xiuli Yang & Xin Miao & Jinli Wu & Ziwei Duan & Rui Yang & Yanhong Tang, 2020. "Towards Holistic Governance of China’s E-Waste Recycling: Evolution of Networked Policies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Mardani, Abbas & Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras & Khalifah, Zainab & Zakuan, Norhayati & Jusoh, Ahmad & Nor, Khalil Md & Khoshnoudi, Masoumeh, 2017. "A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems: Two decades from 1995 to 2015," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 216-256.
    16. Beatrice Villari, 2022. "Designing Sustainable Services for Cities: Adopting a Systemic Perspective in Service Design Experiments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    17. Isalou, Ali A. & Litman, Todd & Shahmoradi, Behzad, 2014. "Testing the housing and transportation affordability index in a developing world context: A sustainability comparison of central and suburban districts in Qom, Iran," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 33-39.
    18. Liao, Huchang & Wu, Xingli & Mi, Xiaomei & Herrera, Francisco, 2020. "An integrated method for cognitive complex multiple experts multiple criteria decision making based on ELECTRE III with weighted Borda rule," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    19. Mulliner, Emma & Malys, Naglis & Maliene, Vida, 2016. "Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 146-156.
    20. Haijin Wu & Guofang Zhai & Wei Chen, 2020. "Combined Rental and Transportation Affordability under China’s Public Rental Housing System—A Case Study of Nanjing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4110-:d:1079002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.