IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3574-d1069320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variable-Weight Suitability Evaluation of Underground Space Development Considering Socioeconomic Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaoliang Peng

    (Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Yu Zhang

    (Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Fei Tan

    (Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Jiahe Lv

    (Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Lianghui Li

    (Shenzhen Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518028, China)

Abstract

The suitability evaluation of urban underground space (UUS) development can aid in making the planning, construction, and operation management of underground spaces more scientific, orderly and systematic. Taking the starting area of Changjiang New Town as an example, this study considered socioeconomic factors as a crucial cost indicator in the suitability evaluation index system of underground space development, and 15 evaluation factors affecting underground space utilization were selected in combination with geological environment conditions. The subjective weights of each evaluation factor were calculated using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and variable-weight theory was introduced to calculate the comprehensive variable weights. The comprehensive variable weights were modified, taking socioeconomic factors into consideration, so as to quantitatively evaluate the development suitability of underground space in the research area. A comparison between the evaluation results of the constant-weight and variable-weight methods showed that the latter can correct the efficaciously determined subjective weight using the AHP and make the evaluation result more scientific and reasonable. A comprehensive consideration of the impact of socioeconomic factors on development costs and benefits made the evaluation results more instructive. The evaluation results showed that the area with the best suitability for underground space development in the study area accounted for approximately 18.6%, and the second-best suitable area accounts for approximately 60.8%. Hence, the development prospect of the study area is good.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaoliang Peng & Yu Zhang & Fei Tan & Jiahe Lv & Lianghui Li, 2023. "Variable-Weight Suitability Evaluation of Underground Space Development Considering Socioeconomic Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3574-:d:1069320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3574/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3574/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qiao, Yong-Kang & Peng, Fang-Le & Wang, Yang, 2017. "Monetary valuation of urban underground space: A critical issue for the decision-making of urban underground space development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 12-24.
    2. Xiaobo Zhang & Chengshan Wang & Jie Fan & Huijun Wang & Hailong Li, 2020. "Optimizing the Analytic Hierarchy Process through a Suitability Evaluation of Underground Space Development in Tonghu District, Huizhou City," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hai-Min Lyu & Ye-Shuang Xu & Wen-Chieh Cheng & Arul Arulrajah, 2018. "Flooding Hazards across Southern China and Prospective Sustainability Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Zi-Yun Zhang & Fang-Le Peng & Chen-Xiao Ma & Hui Zhang & Su-Juan Fu, 2021. "External Benefit Assessment of Urban Utility Tunnels Based on Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Cheng Peng & Chenxiao Ma & Yunhao Dong, 2023. "Unravelling the Formation Mechanism of Sustainable Underground Pedestrian Systems: Two Case Studies in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Ze-Nian Wang & Jun Chen & Wen-Chieh Cheng & Arul Arulrajah & Suksun Horpibulsuk, 2018. "Investigation into the tempo-spatial distribution of recent fire hazards in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(3), pages 1889-1907, July.
    5. Shen, Shui-Long & Lin, Song-Shun & Zhou, Annan, 2023. "A cloud model-based approach for risk analysis of excavation system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    6. Hámor-Vidó, Mária & Hámor, Tamás & Czirok, Lili, 2021. "Underground space, the legal governance of a critical resource in circular economy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    7. Bayer, Peter & Attard, Guillaume & Blum, Philipp & Menberg, Kathrin, 2019. "The geothermal potential of cities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 17-30.
    8. Baoshun Wang & Yanfang Liu & Zhaomin Tong & Rui An & Jiwei Xu, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Dynamic Characteristics of Land Use Intensity in Rapidly Urbanizing Areas from Urban Underground Space Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
    9. Yangbin Zhang & Yuhan Chen & Fengshan Jiang & Zhanting Deng & Zhiqiang Xie & Yuning Zhang & Ping Wen, 2023. "A Comprehensive Study of the Suitability of Urban Underground Spaces for Connection Development: A Case Study of the Erhai Lake Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Wan-Lin Meng & Shuilong Shen & Annan Zhou, 2018. "Investigation on fatal accidents in Chinese construction industry between 2004 and 2016," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(2), pages 655-670, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3574-:d:1069320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.